Doctor Accuses British Government of Endangering the Public.

On Monday, December 20, Dr. Sam White and members of his legal team went to Charing Cross and Hammersmith Police Stations in London in their latest efforts to reveal what they allege are severe safety flaws with the COVID vaccines. They also accuse the British government agencies of suppressing information from the British population intentionally.

The Metropolitan Police Department accepted PJH Law’s criminal complaint, which contained “substantial and irrefutable evidence.” As a result, a crime reference number for “Misconduct in Public Office” has been assigned, as well as a specific officer and police department to deal with it.

The lawyers acting on behalf of Dr White stated: “Of paramount importance and as a matter of public safety, we as a collective have demanded the vaccine rollout is stopped immediately and we suggested an address to the nation is made by the Metropolitan Police to advise accordingly.”

They added: “A number of government departments and in particular individuals in public office and government have been named as offenders and we have supporting evidence.”

Their six-hour police interview was taped, but it will not be released to avoid jeopardizing what is now a pending criminal investigation.

Doctors, nurses, and care workers in the United Kingdom are also being “blackmailed” into taking the vaccination or risk losing their jobs, according to White.

The government has set an April 1, 2022 deadline for healthcare personnel to be fully immunized. This date is more well known as “April Fool’s Day,” a day when practical jokes are traditionally played, but White and his colleagues argue that forcing individuals to take an untested vaccination or risk losing their jobs is not amusing.

“Ivermectin and other safe, proven, effective treatments do keep up with variants and do work,” White says.

Sun Ng, an elderly COVID-19 patient who was assumed to be dying but recovered after being treated with the therapy, showed the beneficial effects of ivermectin. However, as The Epoch Times recently reported, his relatives had to take the hospital in Illinois to court before the medicine could be provided.

“You do not experiment on humans, and consent must be freely given without coercion and include a discussion about alternative treatments such as nutraceuticals, therapeutics, and an individual’s material risk of developing COVID-19 or actually coming to harm from it.”

Dr. white

The astonishing lack of oversight displayed by governments around the world in relation to furthering research in alternative treatments vs. vaccination is far from coincidental. All signs point to a global conspiracy against the common public. This attack on God given rights remains illegitimized as we have not and will not comply with restrictive regulations imposed upon us. Matthew 10:34 says: “Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.”

The internet has proved to be a place in which you can tune into various frequencies in search of a perspective that best fits your narrative. I could make up an argument on the fly and back it up with facts pertaining to my argument. With that being said, the news about COVID-19 is terrifyingly polarizing. There is a spectrum, by which all narratives of the COVID-19 agenda are carefully presented to anyone conducting research. The opposing sides of the spectrum are those who are sold on the COVID-19 pandemic, and those who aren’t sold at all.

But it becomes extremely important that we listen to our gut, when we notice that someone is eyeballing something that rightfully belongs to you. Our civil liberties are merely gods gift to man interpreted by men of power. No man, woman, government, organization, forum, or anything will prosper as a weapon against God. With that being said, when our God given rights are at stake, it is probably best to question the integrity of those who propose the removal of such rights. In summary, if you’re not a “conspiracy theorist” you probably aren’t asking very many questions about the world around you.

My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.

Hosea 4:6

A partial lockdown since last month ends on Sunday for the vaccinated, but those who have not received the required doses will have to remain at home.

“We still have an obligation and a need to increase vaccination coverage so that we don’t go from lockdown to lockdown, next year as well. “There are still well over a million Austrians who aren’t vaccinated. That is too many,” she added. “I say very clearly that we don’t want to punish the people who aren’t vaccinated. We want to bring them along, we want to convince them of this vaccination and we want them to show solidarity with everyone so that we can regain our freedom.”

Karoline Edtstadler, Cabinet minister responsible for constitutional issues.

About 68 percent of Austria’s population is fully vaccinated against COVID-19, one of the lowest rates in Western Europe. Many Austrians are sceptical about vaccines, a view encouraged by the far-right Freedom Party, the third-biggest in parliament. Austria’s conservative-led government has announced details of its plan to make coronavirus vaccines compulsory, saying it will apply to people aged 14 and above, and holdouts face quarterly fines of up to 3,600 euros ($4,071) every three months. Those who refuse to pay, are subject to pay for their own imprisonment for 12 months.

“If detention is carried out by the courts, the associated costs shall be recovered by the courts from the obligated party in accordance with the provisions existing for the recovery of the costs of enforcing judicial penalties,” it states.

“No to vaccine fascism,” read one protest sign.

“I’m not a neo-Nazi or a hooligan,” said another, “I’m fighting for freedom and against the vaccine.”

Despite Fürst protesting that the amendment could be used to further punish the unvaccinated, the measure was approved anyway.

At the time it was announced, then Chancellor Alexander Schallenberg vowed to hit the unvaccinated with “penalties” if they still refused to get the jab, while asserting that they should “suffer.”

Given that some technocrats are asserting that the vaccination program will never end, the initial one year prison sentence for vaccine refusniks could be just the beginning.