Advisory: Be careful of what you read on social media. The algorithms used by these platforms have no regard for Biblical truth. They target your emotions to keep you engaged on their site so their advertisers can drop more ads. These platforms exist to enrich their stockholders. Consider God’s promise to Believers in James 1:5, “If any of you lacks wisdom, you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to you.”
Featured Story
Mega-Rich Are Going into Hiding at Warp Speed!
HNewsWire:
Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Modernity.news,
The mega rich are forcing out millionaires as ‘billionaire bunker’ island, Indian Creek in Miami, Florida, increasingly becomes a private enclave of the uber elite.
A local historian told Bloomberg that even wealthy people can no longer afford to live on the island because they are being priced out by people like Amazon’s Jeff Bezos.
“Only the very wealthy, the billionaires can afford to live in Indian Creek now. Hundreds of millions aren’t gonna cut it anymore,” said Paul George.
Bezos already owns multiple properties on the island and is looking to buy three more, having bought two neighboring homes on the island for a total of nearly $150 million last year.
Why anyone would need five or more properties on one single small island is up for debate, is it just so Bezos can avoid people or is he trying to construct something similar to Mark Zuckerberg, who keeps expanding his secretive Koolau Ranch hideout in Hawaii?
Zuckerberg is building a 5,000-square-foot underground doomsday shelter, something that Bezos is almost certainly trying to emulate.
The privacy of Indian Creek is a big draw for the ultra high net worth, as is the private police force, which “patrols the community around-the-clock by foot, sky, and land.”
The island can only be accessed via a single, guarded bridge and its famous residents have included Ivanka Trump, Carl Icahn, Colombian banker Jaime Gilinski, Jay-Z and Beyoncé.
The waterfront properties are ironically owned by many of the same people who push the narrative that man-made climate change is going to cause apocalyptic sea level rises.
Apparently, they’re going to be just fine though.
As we document in the video above, billionaires are busy buying up private islands in places like Hawaii, Fiji and New Zealand to prepare for what they call ‘the event’.
‘The event’, whatever it ultimately ends up being, will likely be driven by mass resentment towards the very world they created.
When this earth-shattering ‘event’ happens, the billionaires will scurry away into their underground doomsday bunkers which they have been carefully preparing for years.
* * *
Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews
HNewsWire:
In case you missed it, the topic of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) policies has been smashed back to top-of-mind recently as two billionaires battle in public over the benefits (or detriments) of corporate DEI efforts.
Mark Cuban (fighting out of the virtue-signaling pro-DEI corner) did not like Elon Musk's (pro-meritocracy, anti-DEI) criticism of diversity goals set by United Airlines pilot-training academy. The airline wanted its academy to have "50% of enrolled students who are women and/or people of color."
Musk wrote on X:
"The airline industry can't find enough qualified pilots even without insane DEI requirements!"
Cuban snapped back:
"Once they graduate, it's a multi-year process to have an OPPORTUNITY to pilot for United,"
"Since I'm a nice guy and want you to be fully informed, I'll share with you the benefit of the 60 seconds I spent looking for how the program works. BTW, looks like multiple layers of merit-based evaluations before they can fly for United…," Cuban continued while attaching a link to the academy's website.
Musk was not impressed and replied to another user on X, that:
"Mark Cuban is a racist."
Adding (rather humorously) that "The only way to prove he is not racist AND sexist is to put an Asian woman and a white woman on his basketball team!" reiterating his suggestion for Cuban's (former) NBA team, the Dallas Mavericks.
DEI has become a major point of contention among business executives like Musk and Cuban.
Another billionaire who seems to have recently become un-woke - hedge fund manager Bill Ackman - called attention to the practice last week, saying that DEI was "racist because reverse racism is racism."
Musk agreed with Ackman, calling DEI "just another word for racism."
Cuban, on the other hand, felt that Musk was ignoring the benefits of DEI.
"You may not agree, but I take it as a given that there are people of various races, ethnicities, orientation, etc that are regularly excluded from hiring consideration," Cuban wrote in a series of posts on X.
It was at this point that Gad Saad, famed author and expert in evolutionary psychology, jumped in to the fray to unleash a series of truth bombs on X:
"I've been seeing some folks (e.g., @mcuban) defending the virtues in some instances of DIE principles (diversity, inclusion, and equity). There is nothing laudable about the ethos of DIE. Those who support DIE are using consequentialism to justify an otherwise deontological violation. "
Saad points out that he has been explaining for decades that:
"if there are systemic barriers that stop some groups from flourishing (the proverbial equality of opportunities) then by all means fight hard to eradicate such obstacles.
But DIE never operates in that spirit. It always presumes that the non-equality of outcomes must be due to systemic bigotry and hence "Noble People" must intervene to fix the problem (by implementing otherwise "corrective anti-bigoted" policies).
Academia is rife with DIE at all levels and it is a frontal and fatal attack on the meritocratic ethos that shapes scientific and academic excellence.
There is nothing noble, laudable, just, or fair about DIE. You either believe in meritocracy or you don't. DIE is where meritocracy goes to die."
The author then highlights the farce in the real world:
"I've previously discussed data from the US government that shows that across all educational levels (associate, bachelor, master, and doctorate) and five racial breakdowns, women outnumber men in EVERY single one of the 20 cells. And yet, DIE bureaucracies continue to push for "corrective" programs meant to protect women in American and Canadian universities as though we were in Waziristan.
Professors are getting hired or promoted based on their skin color or gender orientation. It is DIE that allows such violations of individual dignity to take place.
Imagine that in the 21st century, universities are OPENLY posting job announcements that restrict the application pool to people of a certain skin hue.
Oh, there aren't enough transgender indigenous women of color who are full professors of pure mathematics, well then we must implement DIE policies to permit such individuals to flourish. This is how you get the Claudine Gay's of the world.
Oh Brown University does not have a full professor transgender of color, clearly this must be because of bigotry, unleash the DIE Taliban.
Oh Wellesley College does not have a non-binary neuroscientist of color, clearly this must be because of bigotry, unleash the DIE Taliban.
Oh not a single pansexual classicist of color at Princeton, clearly this must be because of bigotry, release the DIE Taliban."
Adding a mocking post on X:
This is allowed, Saad explains, because of "past historical grievances."
"No! You do not address past grievances by committing the exact same bigotry albeit on a new class of "acceptable" people. Oh you are white and heterosexual AND male, sorry asshole, no professorship for you."
Saad even wrote a book on the 'parasitic mind virus' that is killing common sense:
DIE is a violation of deontological principles.
There is no "I believe in free speech but not for Donald Trump" or "I believe in the presumption of innocence but not for Brett Kavanaugh" or "I believe journalistic integrity but not when it comes to Hunter Biden's laptop."
Similarly, you cannot be for the meritocratic ethos and be for DIE. This is akin to being a pregnant virgin."
In summary,
😉
— Gad Saad (@GadSaad) January 9, 2024 ">Saad pulls no punches:
"DIE is grotesque. DIE is cancer. DIE is racism. DIE is bigotry. DIE is non-meritocratic. DIE kills innovation. DIE kills excellence. DIE is collectivist punishment. DIE is Ebola.
DIE is an affront to individual dignity. There is nothing redeemable about this racist ethos that masquerades as progressive social justice."
Musk agreed (humorously):
Harsh, but fair. Thoughts, Mr.Cuban?
Certain Academics Maintain That Certain Bible Predictions Have Not and Will Not Come to Pass. That Isn’t the Way the Bible Is; Certain Predictions Haven’t Had Time to Come to Pass.
HNewsWire:
On Monday, Elon Musk's X sued Media Matters, claiming that the David Brock-founded leftist 'watchdog' group manipulated the platform to show major ads next to Nazi imagery, causing a flood of advertisers to leave the platform.
"The end result was a feed precision-designed by Media Matters for a single purpose: to produce side-by-side ad/content placements that it could screenshot in an effort to alienate advertisers," causing "all but one of the companies featured in the Media Matters piece withdrawing all ads from X, including Apple, Comcast, NBCUniversal, and IBM—some of X’s largest advertisers."
The move by Media Matters was a successful attempt to brand Elon Musk and his platform as antisemitic, after Musk took fire for agreeing with a post suggesting that liberal Jews - who "have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them," are now on the receiving end of things.
Japs, Jewry And Trannies
What happened next couldn't have been better scripted in pre-woke Hollywood. It turns out that Media Matters President Angelo Carusone wrote super antisemitic blog posts in the early 2000s, which were uncovered by the Daily Caller's Peter Hasson in 2019, and have been making the rounds of late given the Musk controversy.
In one blog post titled "Tranny Paradise," the future Media Matters president went on a lengthy diatribe against a 'tranny-loving author.'
In another post that same month, Carusone suggested in response to a male basketball coach's alleged sexual and physical abuse of female players; "lighten up Japs."
In an October 2005 post, Carusone said of his boyfriend, "despite his jewry, you KNOW he's adorable."
In another post, he suggested that his Jewish boyfriend only leaned conservative "as a result of his possession of several bags of Jewish gold."
We know, we know - who cares, right?
The point is that Carusone is a massive, virtue-signaling hypocrite for suggesting that Musk was antisemitic for agreeing with a defensible observation, while he himself broke several 'cardinal rules' of being a liberal wokescold.
As even the Washington Post noted at the time of the Caller article, "Carusone’s postings are indeed offensive, and if he’s going to serve as president of an organization renowned for unearthing overlooked and objectionable comments from people’s past, he deserves to be called out on his own transgressions."
Carusone said in reply, "It’s true: I wrote some gross things on my blog while I was in college. A few posts parodying living my life as if I were a self-loathing, bigoted Limbaugh right-winger."
Ah yes, just parody.
But wait, there's more!
Apparently a bunch of Media Matters employees hate Israel. The thing Media Matters is accusing Musk of. And hey, it's a free country - but the hypocrisy is just too thick to ignore.
Amazing!
It’s Going to Get Interesting, It’s Going to Get Messy, and We Will See Mayhem Around the Globe
The 20 Republicans Who Voted Against Jordan
HNewsWire:
On the first vote today, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) did not win the job of House speaker. There will likely be a second vote. These are the Republicans in Congress who wouldn't back Jordan. They should be able to call you. Now is the time to turn on the call button in Congress. This is the number: 202-225-3121.
Bacons (NE) Buck, Colorado D'Esposito (NY) Chavez-Deremer (OR
�) Balart Diaz (FL) Elise (TX) Garbarino (New York) Giménez (FL) Sanchez (TX) Granger (Texas) John (MI) James (PA) The Kiggans (VA) LaLota (New York) Lamasfla (CA) Jones (FL) Lawler (NY) It's Simpson (ID), Spartz (IN), and Womack (AR).
Texas Joins West Virginia In Boycotting BlackRock Over 'Decarbonization' Push
Typically, letters to investors don't elicit this kind of backlash. But given BlackRock's outsize influence on the US (and the global) economy, perhaps it's not surprising that a handful of US states with thriving energy industries are expressing their frustration with BlackRock CEO Larry Fink and his latest essay about the importance of "stakeholder capitalism".
As we reported yesterday, West Virginia's state treasurer has announced that the state would end use of BlackRock funds for all state investments in retaliation for the firm's antagonistic stance toward the oil and gas industry.
Now, Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick has joined the fray, issuing a letter of his own late Wednesday urging his own state's comptroller, Glenn Hegar, to place BlackRock on a list of companies that have cut ties with the Texas oil and gas industry.
"If Wall Street turns their back on Texas and our thriving oil and gas industry, then Texas will not do business with Wall Street," Patrick wrote.
Unlike his previous letter to investors from 2021, when Fink announced BlackRock's commitment to achieving "net zero" emissions while pressuring energy companies to make climate protection more of a priority, Fink said in his latest letter that companies must balance the interests of many different stakeholders. In a sense, Fink was walking back BlackRock's hostile stance toward fossil fuel companies.
BlackRock clarified in a statement that it "does not boycott energy companies," according to Bloomberg.
The firm "does not boycott energy companies," New York-based BlackRock said in an emailed statement. "We do not pursue divestment from oil and gas companies as a policy. We will continue to invest in these companies and work with them to maximize long-term value for our clients. Our primary concern with the law is the potential negative consequences it could have on current and future Texas pensioners."
In his letter to Hegar, Lt. Gov. Patrick referenced the "Oil & Gas Investment Protection Act", a Texas law that was passed and signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott last year. The law stipulates that the Texas government shouldn't contract with or invest in companies that boycott the energy industry. As part of the law, the state comptroller is tasked with preparing an "official list" of firms that are attacking the state's most important industry. Lt. Gov. Patrick is asking that BlackRock be placed "at the top" of that list.
Patrick explained that BlackRock's commitment to "net zero" emissions and decarbonization directly contradicts the firm's assurances that it is "committed to Texas and Texas's vast energy footprint."
"Just yesterday, BlackRock Chairman and CEO, Larry Fink, issued his annual 2022 letter to CEOs indicating that BlackRock’s goal is to transition to a “net zero” world, including decarbonizing the energy sector. Needless to say, it is highly inconsistent to claim support for Texas’ oil and gas energy industry while leading a “net zero” policy effort that will destroy the oil and gas industry and destabilize the economy worldwide."
Now that Texas has joined W.Va. in slamming BlackRock and Larry Fink over their (largely fanciful) commitments to "net zero" and promises to divest from oil and gas firms, we're certainly curious to see if any more states with vibrant energy industries (Oklahoma, perhaps?) add their voices to the chorus of criticism directed at the world's largest asset manager.
Readers can find Lt. Gov Patrick's complete letter below:
Dear Comptroller Hegar,
Thank you for your ongoing efforts to implement Senate Bill (SB) 13 (87th Regular Session), the Oil & Gas Investment Protection Act, by Sen. Brian Birdwell, R-Granbury. As you know, this law says Texas should not contract with or invest in companies that boycott energy companies. Because I strongly believe we need to prioritize and protect our state’s and nation’s energy independence, I made the passage of SB 13 a high priority.
As you prepare the official list of companies that boycott energy companies, I ask that you include BlackRock, and any company like them, that choose to hurt Texas oil and gas energy companies by boycotting them in violation of Senate Bill 13. As I have stated before, if Wall Street turns their back on Texas and our thriving oil and gas industry, then Texas will not do business with Wall Street.
Please know, BlackRock only recently met with my office after you sent BlackRock and others a letter threatening to take action against entities that boycott energy companies. At the meeting with my staff, Blackrock said it was committed to Texas and Texas’s vast energy footprint, but I have grave concerns that BlackRock’s public statements and actions do not reflect its sentiments presented to my office.
Just yesterday, BlackRock Chairman and CEO, Larry Fink, issued his annual 2022 letter to CEOs indicating that BlackRock’s goal is to transition to a “net zero” world, including decarbonizing the energy sector. Needless to say, it is highly inconsistent to claim support for Texas’ oil and gas energy industry while leading a “net zero” policy effort that will destroy the oil and gas industry and destabilize the economy worldwide.
This is nothing new for Mr. Fink. In his 2020 letter to CEOs, he stated that Blackrock would be “exiting investments that present a high sustainability-related risk."
He expanded on this initiative further in his letter to BlackRock’s clients:
"Where we do not see progress in [transitioning to “net zero”], and in particular where we see a lack of alignment combined with a lack of engagement, we will not only use our vote against management for our index portfolio-held shares, we will also flag these holdings for potential exit in our discretionary active portfolios[.]"
According to Bloomberg on January 12, 2022, when addressing their new Climate Action Multi-Asset Fund and Climate Action Equity Fund, BlackRock said that it intends to incorporate a year-on-year decarbonization rate and identify companies that appear to be “long-term, disruptive structural winners” in driving down greenhouse gas emissions.
These statements indicate that BlackRock is capriciously discriminating against the oil and gas industry by exiting investments solely because companies do not subscribe to a “net zero” policy beyond what is required by law.
According to SB 13, a company is considered to be boycotting an energy company if it limits relations with an entity involved in the fossil fuel-based energy sector if the entity “does not commit or pledge to meet environmental standards beyond applicable federal and state law[.]” Committing to a “net zero” carbon strategy is beyond applicable environmental standards in federal and state law. Therefore, BlackRock is boycotting energy companies by basing investment decisions on whether a company pledges to meet BlackRock’s “net zero” goals.
Furthermore, BlackRock’s discrimination goes well beyond just its investment decisions. In a recent Wall Street Journal article, it was noted that “BlackRock made waves last spring when it voted to replace three Exxon Mobil Corp. directors over the oil giant’s reluctance to quickly transition to cleaner energy sources.” It is not appropriate for Mr. Fink and BlackRock, or any other company, to arbitrarily strong-arm the energy sector to commit to exceed federal and state environmental laws.
As you prepare the list of those that boycott Texas energy companies, I ask that BlackRock be at the top of the list, and any company like them that discriminates against Texas energy. I am committed to keeping Texas the number one oil and gas state in the country. Texas will not do business with those that boycott fossil fuels.
Thank you for all you do for Texas.
Texas AG Accuses Biden Admin Of Creating Border Crisis As Large Migrant Caravan Approaches
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has accused the Biden administration of not following federal laws and “inviting” illegal migrants by changing policies meant to discourage them from entering the country.
Paxton’s comments come as a migrant caravan with almost 3,000 Haitians and Central Americans reportedly departed Tapachula, Mexico late last week and were heading towards the southern border, according to Mexican news reports and social media.
Speaking to Fox News Live, Paxton described the situation as “deja-vu.”
“The Biden administration is not doing what they need to do to stop this. As a matter of fact, they’re inviting it,” he said.
“The border patrol is frustrated with having to deal with logistics and handling these families.”
Paxton said border agents are risking their lives but “are not encouraged to do their jobs … or protect the border. They’re not allowed to have the resources that they need.”
Led by Center for Human Dignity leader Luis Garcia Villagran, the migrant caravan plans to join up with former Arizona activist Irineo Mujica in Veracruz and other migrants before entering the United States.
According to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) statistics, there have almost been 1.6 million illegal aliens apprehended during the fiscal year 2021. When migrants stopped at the border are included, the number comes to 2 million.
“It’s clear to me that the Biden administration does not want to stop this,” Paxton said.
“They have changed all the policies that stopped this,” referring to Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” program.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton at a press conference in Anzalduas Park near McAllen, Texas, on April 28, 2021. (Charlotte Cuthbertson/The Epoch Times)
In January, President Joe Biden paused deportations, stopped border wall construction, halted the Remain in Mexico program, repurposed Immigration and Customs Enforcement priorities, and reversed the ban on travel from terror-prone countries.
Paxton said that his office had to sue the Biden administration seven times and that they had won, but the administration still hasn’t implemented the program for migrants to stay back in Mexico.
Regarding whether it was fair to condemn the administration for drug dealers and criminals being part of the people coming in, Paxton said, “They know these cartels are gaining strength … They charge for almost everybody that crosses the border. You’re not getting across without paying the cartels … an average of $8,000,” according to estimates from Border Patrol.
“The Biden administration knows this. They’re aiding and abetting the cartels for not only the transportation of drugs but also the transportation of human beings.”
Paxton reiterated that if the administration just enforces laws passed by Congress, restricts migrants to Mexico, and deports criminals, there could be an immigration policy that works.
U.S. residents living near the border have to bear the brunt of the issue while Americans elsewhere are currently not impacted, Paxton said. “They’re not going to be affected like the people on the border whose property is being damaged, who are scared to go out at night or sometime even in the day,” because they don’t know who’s crossing their properties, he said.
“This is going to affect the entire nation because these people are moved around secretly, overnight on planes and buses … Some have COVID, some are drug-runners, potentially criminals, they could be terrorists. We don’t know … We aren’t able to keep track of them,” he said.
The White House has dodged difficult questions relating to the border and has refused to call it a “crisis,” instead saying it’s focusing on the “root causes” of illegal immigration and that it’s seeking a “fair, orderly, and humane” immigration system.
Last month, when asked by CNN whether he plans to visit the border, Biden said, “I guess I should go down. But the—but the whole point of it is: I haven’t had a whole hell of a lot of time to get down.”
Biden met with Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador on Thursday to discuss a range of issues of which one was migration. Source: ZeroHedge
Treat your skin well. Our soaps are gentle and produce a smooth, creamy lather that is nourishing to your skin. They are handmade in small batches. We use only high-quality natural ingredients. No chemicals, no sodium laurel sulfate, no phthalates, no parabens, no detergents. GraniteRidgeSoapworks
Use the code HNEWS10 to receive 10% off your first purchase.
The House on Wednesday voted 223-207 to censure Republican Rep. Paul Gosar following a video he posted on Twitter (which has now been deleted) that features him as an anime character attacking President Joe Biden and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
The video in question, which Gosar posted Sunday night, depicts Gosar’s face edited onto a character from popular anime show “Attack on Titan,” parodying the show’s opening credits. At one point in the video, Gosar’s character, wielding two swords, attacks characters with Ocasio-Cortez’s and Biden’s faces.
Gosar also posted a meme, mocking the backlash he received for the original video...
— Rep. Paul Gosar, DDS (@RepGosar) November 9, 2021
Ahead of the vote, AOC told reporters that “in a perfect world” Gosar would be expelled from the House, but, as RCP's Carl Cannon noted, she’ll take what pound of flesh she can get -- namely the neutering of the “creepy” congressman.
Her fellow Democrats were all in. Calling Gosar’s video “an insult to the institution of the House of Representatives,” Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, “We cannot have members joking about murdering each other as well as threatening the president of the United States.”
Two of Pelosi’s fellow Californians, Reps. Adam Schiff and Ted Lieu, labeled the entire House GOP “sick” for not joining Democrats in their effort to expel Gosar over his crude spoof.
Did Rep. Ted Lieu, for example, consider Kathy Griffin a “sick” pariah? Did he call for her to be banned or censured or punished? In a word, no.
The resolution also strips Gosar of his main committee assignments which include House Oversight - which Ocasio-Cortez also serves on - as well as the Natural Resources Committee.
Two House Republicans joined the Democrats in censuring Gosar... Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Illinois.
When Any Nation Can No Longer Judge Between Good and Evil, Right and Wrong, and Light and Darkness, Its People Are Reprobates…
Here are some demons you may recognize. They are partners with ingratitude. These are Godward (repentance is an absolute necessity): Ingratitude to God Dishonor of God Rejection of God & His dealings with you Thanklessness Hatred Towards God Anger Towards God
- Ingratitude to God Dishonor of God
- Rejection of God & His dealings with you
- Thanklessness Hatred Towards God Anger Towards God
- Dishonor of God
- Rejection of God & His dealings with you
- Proud and arrogant and contemptuous boasters. Have you ever noticed who does the bragging and boasting? It is usually those who are attempting to cover their failures. Are they full of hot air? People who boast are really showing their rejection.
The control demon is called "Schizophrenia" or "Double-Mindedness". The Bible says, "A double-minded man is unstable in all of his ways" (James 1:8).
The phrase translated "two minds" comes from a compound Greek word literally meaning "two souls". The CEO's of Google ,Twitter and Facebook are "Schizophrenia" or "Double-Mindedness"
I go back to my original statement in January, this is a "Pestilence", God knew evil men were in labs concocting a virus with the intention of harming humanity. SRH...
It’s interesting to me you don’t find the words plague(s) and pestilence in the New Testament under any context other than the judgment of God. (In fact, for the most part, the context of those words in the Old Testament is also within the judgment of God.
Source: ZeroHedge HNewsWire HNewsWire ZeroHedge Reference
StevieRay Hansen
Editor,
HNewsWire.com
[email protected]
The worst-case scenario is outright civil war. This is too horrible to contemplate, but this possibility is real. President Biden said his patience is wearing thin. That works both ways. Things are getting tense in Australia. It could happen here, too.
Remember, the first people Hitler put in concentration camps weren't the Jews. The first people were the intellectuals, because if you take the intellectuals and the doctors off the street, if you stop people from talking, you can control the people.
Tagged In
Newsletter
Must Read
Other Sources
Latest News
Watchman: Dr. Hodkinson: “It’s Not a Time to Say ‘I’m Sorry’ – It’s a Time to Put These Bastards in Jail” “ We’ve Seen the Biggest Kill Ever in Medicine History…”
HNewsWire: “Should we forgive and forget?” “Absolutely not!” roared Dr. Roger Hodkinson. “How can you look into the eyes of a pregnant woman and tell…
Read More
Watchman Reports COVID-virus Mutating Into Something Far More Deadlier, Pestilence Will Not Go Away
I SRH, fiercely defend my anti-Vaccine position, and advocate a pro-God, pure immune system for all true Believers. Treat your skin well. Our soaps are…
Read More
Watchman: I Remain Steadfast in My Assertion That N5N1 Is Entirely Fictional. However a Deadly Pestilence Has Arisen as a Result of These Crazy Scientists’ Prolonged Manipulation of God’s Creation, Which Includes Bill Gates and His Pals.
By SRH, Gain of function studies, supported by Drs. Francis S. Collins and Anthony Fauci, really produced a mutant strain of H5N1 more than ten…
Read More
Watchman’s Daily Devotional: The Language Employed by God to Describe Their Unfaithfulness Is Powerful, Labeling It as “Whoredom.” They Had Vowed to Love God Wholeheartedly.
17 However, they disregarded the advice of their judges and Whored themselves before other gods. They quickly strayed from the path taken by their fathers,…
Read More
Update: “To Kill With Sword With Famine and With Pestilence” the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
HNewsWire: 2 Timothy 3:1-5… But understand this, that in the last days there will come times of difficulty. For people will be lovers of self,…
Read More
We make every effort to acknowledge sources used in our news articles. In a few cases, the sources were lost due to a technological glitch. If you believe we have not given sufficient credit for your source material, please contact us, and we will be more than happy to link to your article.
Hey StevieRay. Did you know that we’re not even close yet to the most amount of votes taken to decide on a Speaker of the House?
In 1819 they voted 22 times before electing a Speaker.
In 1849 63 times
In 1859 44 times.
And in 1855 they voted a whopping 133 times before electing a Speaker of the House.
So what some may be thinking is unprecedented with a Speaker chosen after 15 votes is actually not even close. And what some are calling “discord”, “chaos”, and “anarchy”, is actually the way the House was created to function.
Great Point Edward!!