Leftists Aren’t the Only People That Are Pushing for Red Flag Laws. Donald Trump Is a Vocal Supporter

Mr. Trump last year made a statement to the effect that the police should take the guns first and then go to court and have a judge decide, here’s what I can tell you, we have elected REPROBATES and they are now our slave masters, and these corrupt elected officials are going to disarm the America people, it’s coming, and it will be sooner rather than later. SRH…

Trump says he supports “red flag laws”

Donald Trump addressed the nation on Monday in the wake of two deadly mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio over the weekend. He blamed violent video games and mental health for the shooting and called for “red flag laws” as a measure of gun control. Weijia Jiang and Caitlin Huey-Burns joined CBSN to break down the president’s response to the shootings, as well as that of 2020 candidates. AUG 5, 2019

“Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not” Thomas Jefferson In the Lord’s freedom a sheepdog standing.warrior on

White-bread Americans are in for a rude awakening as they find themselves at the end of a barrel and being told to disarm under the guise of “Red Flag” gun confiscation laws.

The enforcement of Red Flag gun confiscation laws that are currently in place in 14 states now, will statistically impact everyone. In upcoming years as confrontations with law enforcement grows, everyone reading this article will know people impacted by gun confiscation and gun confrontations.

Dr. Chuck Baldwin accurately described these laws recently in a column entitled An Open Letter To Our Legislators, Judges And Lawmen, an article I beg everyone to pass along, especially to their law enforcement friends. He writes,

The “red flag” laws that are sweeping the country violate every principle of liberty upon which our country was founded. There is no due process associated with “red flag” laws. A judge’s order to seize the firearms from an American citizen who has not been accused of a crime, charged with a crime, convicted of a crime—or who never even threatened to commit a crime—based on the accusation of a single individual is anything but due process.

Our accuser could be a disgruntled employee, a bitter ex-spouse or relative, a vengeful neighbor, an anti-gun liberal or even an anti-gun policeman. By definition, “red flag” laws use mere suspicion of what one “might” do as justification to seize a person’s firearms. Tactics such as these have been used in virtually every despotic regime of history. In the name of protecting society, the rights and liberties of individuals were denied. Eventually, these repressive governments included political or religious persuasion as triggering “red flags,” which led to their disarmament—all in the name of public safety, of course.” (Chuck Baldwin Live)

This is a precise description of how these laws operate; they force confrontations with police and civilians based on nothing but unsubstantiated proof. It is obvious to see how this is ripe for abuse, exactly like kids who falsely call in SWAT team raids on video game opponents as a malicious joke in the past. A game that turned deadly, for example, the case of Tyler Barriss, who gave a false report and as a result, unarmed people died by police. When police act on unsubstantiated proof, without due process, in a militarized manner, civilians die, as does the Constitution and trust of the governed. If police are the cause of violence in suburban, middle-class America, as it is in the ghettos, you just watch how fast the public trust erodes.

Let’s Do the Math

Since the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting occurred in Parkland, Florida, 14 states have started enacting “Red Flag” gun laws across the nation. As mentioned above these laws can, and do trigger raids on private citizens based on nothing more than a tip to police.

The fact is, in the United States, there are over 118 million gun-owning households that could potentially be next because of an anonymous tipster.

“With an estimated 118 million households in the United States, per the U.S. Census, that would mean that the country’s 393 million guns are distributed among 50 million households. The implication is that the average gun-owning household owns nearly eight guns.” (Washington Post)

Statistically speaking, if a conservative 1% of those 118 million houses are stormed by tipped off SWAT teams, that means a potential 1.2 million households could possibly be exposed to military-style raids as the practice becomes accepted and routine.

Now imagine, if just 1% of those 1.2 million households flagged for raids, will fire back at law enforcement, this means statically there could be as many as 11,800 cases of senseless gun violence committed by law enforcement on non-violent law-abiding citizens without proper due process in the upcoming years.

Let’s face it, under these circumstances many gun-owning Americans will not cooperate and instead defend their property, homes, family, and the guns themselves seeing them as essential to their freedom.

Imagine that upwards to 12,000 incidents of future gunfire between the accused citizenry and police in the near future. Is that something our society can afford? These figures are conservative considering the probability of gun owners becoming violent goes up significantly when you realize many will fight back simply out of principle, and in the name of rebelling against tyranny as more laws take effect.

Red Flag lawmakers are forcing a confrontation between gun owners in this country. There is no way for scenarios like these to yield anything but violence and bloodshed in homes across America.

It has been widely reported that literally thousands of gun-owners have already been subjected to Red Flag orders and confiscations. Fox News reports that more than 1700 guns have already been confiscated, the report reads,

“More than 1,700 orders allowing guns to be seized for weeks, months or up to a year were issued in 2018 by the courts after they determined the individuals were a threat to themselves or others. The actual number is probably much higher since the data was incomplete and didn’t include California, where newly-installed Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has moved swiftly to curtail gun rights.” (FOX News)

The rule of law does not exist, they are in a state of nature and in a state of nature only the strong will survive such an encounter. Obviously, he will die and maybe a police officer will die, but the state will survive and march on to the next house on their list perpetuating this violent cycle. In my opinion, this scenario is a net loss on that man’s life, on the police who initiated the violence, and also on society as a whole, and I would encourage people to not do this, but let’s face it do to Red Flag laws the government has made it inevitable.

In this scenario most would say that is what I plan on doing, my gun rights and freedom is a matter of principle and they are willing to die for that principle at that moment. I would stop you and say, nobody is arguing your right, but strategically speaking seeing that government has gone rogue as these raids become commonplace, would you rather shoot now or shoot later when the ire of the public has organized itself in a way that can overcome the collective power of that rogue government? So, if your intent is to defy government then do it in a time and place in which you can match power for power which means force multiply as quickly as possible. Maybe have some decoy registered guns would be a good idea, while you have a stockpile of unregistered guns elsewhere so you don’t have to even feign resistance to await a better moment.

In battle you never let your opponent pick the battlefield, you pick the battlefield, you pick the target and proceed only when success is assured. If you die in the heat of the moment when you could have succumbed and come back later on your own terms, with more power to bear that is what you should do. Dying in a hail of bullets is a huge tactical error, you allowed your enemy to get a jump on you and now are dead as a result. Pick your battles, sometimes it is best to give what you have and come back later with more power when others are ready to join the cause. This is what the founders did. They did not fight as ragtag bands, instead, they waited until every colony was represented and ready to engage in the fight, only then did they win, only then did they have the entire body politic at their backs in order to take on such a large force like the British army.

Every instance of government Red Flag overreach just brings more and more people to the side of revolution against such tyrants. Choose your battle; giving up a little ground to gain a great deal of strength later will always be a wiser path. You want to put yourself in a winning position, not a losing position. These lawmakers and cops who are enforcing these laws are tantalizingly close to causing full out armed rebellion in this country and that is their bad, and the consequences in this life and the next will be on them.

Conclusion

Having to talk this way and encourage people to think through these scenarios is a sad day for America. The fact that our governing officials are so eager to throw law-abiding gun-owners into lawless states of violent confrontation, again and again, is a staggering realization. To think this is happening under Trump, not Obama should be a wake-up call to conservatives who mindless praise the man.

Red Flag laws become a self-fulfilling prophecy for the state. The politicians have already proven they will unthinkingly write these laws, and law enforcement personnel will undoubtedly continue to subject themselves to the dangers of enforcing these laws. I am asking everyone to count the risks, and prepare for the worst knowing that the government has decided to invade homes, steal property, and disarm citizens. The public trust has been dashed to pieces in the face of Red Flag laws.

StevieRay Hansen
Editor, HNewsWire.com

The Birth Pains Are Growing Stronger….

One of the signs of ruling class collapse is when they can no longer enforce the rules that maintain them as a ruling class. When the Romans started making exceptions to republican governance, it was a matter of time before someone simply decided the rules no longer applied to them. Perhaps the robot historians will consider Obama our Marius or Sulla. Maybe that person is in the near future. Either way, the rule of law is over and what comes next is the rule of men.

“Man will ultimately be governed by God or by tyrants.” as in Nancy Pelosi (D-San Fran-feces)

Our government has been overthrown. As evidenced by Trump’s capitulation on the border, his recent servitude to the GMO industry and his acquiescence to the warmongers, our President has been compromised. Our liberties are being eliminated one by one. Gun confiscation is next. The Constitution is gasping its last breaths. Our borders are destroyed and our culture has been turned upside down by every perversion known to man.

The watchman does not confuse truth with consensus. The Watchman does not confuse God’s word with the word of those who happen to hold power at present, or with the opinion of the majority. This is because powerholders and the majority can fall victim to a lying spirit-and this means a power that actually seizes the majority of experts, the political leadership, and the public.

They are tolerant of everything except dissenting values and opinions — meaning, of course, they are tolerant of nothing that matters, only themselves.”

Let Me Make This Abundantly Clear. (I Am Apolitical) While I Have a General Distaste for Electric Cars and Politicians No Matter the Party They Belong To, I Am Unashamedly Politically a Bible Believing Conservative Christian. I Have a Severe Distrust of Government. I Believe It Is the Most Inefficient and Ineffective Way to Accomplish Most Things. While I Strongly Disagree with Liberals/Progressives and Conservative on Most Political Issues, and While I Believe Liberals/Progressives and Most Politicians Are Terribly Misguided and Naive About What Big Government Will Eventually Result In, I Strive to Not Question Their Motives. at the Same Time, While I Find Myself in Agreement with Conservative Politicians on Some Issues, I Do Not Believe Electing Republicans Is the Answer to Everything. for Me, Very Sadly, the Main Difference Between Republicans and Democrats Is How Quickly They Want to Drive the Car Towards the Cliff. Simply Put, I Do Not Believe the Government Is the Solution for Everything. I Do Not Place Any Faith, Trust, or Hope in Any Politicians to Fix What Is Wrong with the World. “Come Lord Jesus!” (Revelation 22:20) The prophet does not confuse truth with consensus. The watchman does not confuse God’s word with the word of those who happen to hold power at present, or with the opinion of the majority. This is because powerholders and the majority can fall victim to a lying spirit-and this means a power that actually seizes the majority of experts, the political leadership, and the public.StevieRay Hansen

gun laws, RedFlagLaws, Trump’s capitulation, government Red Flag laws, Politicians, Red Flag gun confiscation laws