Ontario Refusing to Repeal Vaccine Passport Tyranny.

Ontario’s health minister announced today that the government will not abandon its vaccine passport system as other jurisdictions have done, and that the mask requirement will be in place “for some time.”

Christine Elliott said at a press conference in Kitchener, Ont., that the government will suspend Directive 2 “in the coming days” and begin a “gradual and cautious” resumption of non-emergent or non-urgent surgeries and procedures.

“We’ve already set out our opening timelines and started on Jan. 31. The next phase is as of Feb. 21, and then March 14. We have no plans currently to drop the passport vaccination situation or masking. We believe that masking is going to be important for some time to come,” Elliott added.

Several provinces have lately stated that their COVID-19 vaccine passport programs and other pandemic restrictions will be phased out.

In Alberta, the necessity for proof of vaccination expired on February 8, and all businesses had their capacity limits relaxed, with the exception of bigger venues with more than 500 people. Starting Feb. 14, the province will also repeal the rule mandating youngsters to wear masks in school.

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe also stated on February 8 that the province’s vaccine passport mandate will be phased down beginning February 14. By the end of February, the province’s mask requirements will have expired.

Most COVID-19 restrictions will be lifted by March 14, according to the Quebec government, however masking and proof-of-vaccination requirements will remain in effect until further notice.

The Ontario government produced a roadmap last month outlining the steps the province will take to reduce public health measures, however it does not say when masking or the requirement for confirmation of immunization will be lifted.

When asked if Ontario will lessen or eliminate the requirement for vaccine passports before March 14, Elliott said “we are willing to change if necessary” based on the number of hospitalizations and recommendations from the province’s chief medical officer of health.

“We are looking at the evidence on a daily basis as well. The trends are going in a good direction now, but we can’t sit back on our laurels and assume that it’s going to always continue,” Elliott added.

With the relaxation of COVID-19-related travel restrictions, France, Greece, and Portugal have become the latest European countries to do so.

Vaccinated tourists, for example, will not be required to provide a negative COVID-19 test in order to enter, whereas unvaccinated visitors will. Greece also no longer requires pre-departure testing.

Officials in France said this week that the country will no longer require vaccinated people from outside the European Union to pass a COVID-19 test.

“We again required tests in December over the Omicron variant. In the coming days we will announce that tests are no longer needed for vaccinated people,” Clement Beaune of the Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs told France 2 TV on Tuesday.

the mainstream media has nothing to say about the questionable things going on in our nation as usual. All the pawns are being put in place to asphyxiate followers of Christ. America lost its morals after this pandemic. Christian teachings are a threat to secularism, centralized governmental power and the valueless entertainment industry; Which funds all the wrong people. Not to mention The World Economic Forum is casting its shadow on America; Budging the democratic party to adhere to a globalist agenda. This is foreshadowing of persecution and tribulation yet to come.

Much of the “loosened restrictions” we’re seeing across Europe are still discriminatory against the unvaccinated citizens. If 62% of the global population has received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccines, there’s something to be said about these politicians failing to represent the 32% of people across the world. Mainstream media will undoubtedly try to avoid addressing the tyrannical measures imposed on unvaccinated citizens. Many of whom are God fearing individuals that have a fundamental comprehension of their God given rights. 1 Peter 4:12-14 says: “Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery trial when it comes upon you to test you, as though something strange were happening to you. But rejoice insofar as you share Christ’s sufferings, that you may also rejoice and be glad when his glory is revealed. If you are insulted for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you.” Stay inquisitive in the word of God, and the world around you.

A federal judge decided Feb. 2 that Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and all other military authorities are prohibited from taking punitive action against two specific service members seeking religious exemptions from the military’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

In a 10-page order, U.S. District Judge Steven Merryday, a George H. W. Bush appointee, stated that the Marine Corps lieutenant colonel and Navy Command officer were “wrongfully denied a religious exemption from COVID-19 vaccination.”

According to court records, the lieutenant colonel was told she would be penalized starting Feb. 2 if she did not receive one dosage of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Meanwhile, the Navy officer was informed that if he did not begin a COVID-19 immunization series by Feb. 3, he would be removed from command of his ship.

Both of their religious exemption applications were declined, and their appeals were also denied.

Top military officials determined that the commander’s religious beliefs are genuine and that being forced to get vaccinated would be “substantially burdensome,” but that granting the exemption request “would have a predictable and detrimental effect on the readiness of you and the Sailors who serve alongside you.”

In the instance of the Marines, the lieutenant colonel’s details her religious aversion to any vaccine made with fetal cell lines originated from becoming pregnant as a result of a rape, she said in a sworn declaration.

Despite each sailor getting their request endorsed by their unit’s commanding officer, and each sailor submitting “distinct, personal accounts of our religious practices and the method by which receipt of the COVID-19 vaccine would violate those tenets,” she added, each sailor’s application was denied.

A Marine official questioned whether having a COVID-19 vaccine would materially burden a religious belief, according to the denial letter, because the same objections the lieutenant colonel raised “could be made for every FDA approved vaccine [she] has received” in the military.

Even if a major hardship could be established, the official stated that “the government’s compelling interests in military readiness and force health and safety” warranted the denial of the request.

According to Merryday, the judges, both the Navy and the Marine Corps’ rejections forgot to mention that the two branches had individually given hundreds of medical exemptions from the COVID-19 vaccine obligation.

He said the case’s record “creates a strong inference that the services are discriminatorily and systematically denying religious exemptions without a meaningful and fair hearing and without the showing required under RFRA (while simultaneously granting medical exemptions and allowing unvaccinated persons to continue in service without adverse consequences).” The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, or RFRA, is a law that plaintiffs and defendants interpret differently.

The military has not established, and likely cannot establish,”that permitting the relatively small number of RFRA objectors, even if every request for exemption (much less the two at issue in this motion) were sincere and successful, to serve without adverse consequences to their standing and the terms and conditions of their service will adversely affect the public’s interest in the maintenance and readiness of the nation’s military forces,” Merryday later added. “In fact, the public undoubtedly has some considerable interest in maintaining the services of skilled, experienced, highly trained, patriotic, courageous, and esteemed service members, such as the two moving service members, in whom the public has an immense financial investment and who are not, to say the least, readily replaceable.”

The judge postponed the two members’ penalties for the time being and set a hearing for Feb. 10 in federal court in Tampa, Florida.

Government attorneys argued that the court lacked power to decide whether military leaders should remain in their positions, and that the request for a temporary restraining order should be denied.

“Plaintiffs invite this Court to begin judicial oversight of individual assignment, reassignment, and command decisions, asking this Court to enjoin the Navy from removing the commander of a warship and to stop withdrawal of another’s command selection. Such unprecedented judicial action would damage the military’s interests in readiness, health of service members, and good order and discipline, and the public interest in the national security of the United States,” they wrote in a filing that failed to sway the judge.

While this small win for our service members is getting the recognition that it deserves, we cannot forget that countless service members have been displaced without a second thought from the Department of Defense. This is nothing but a ploy to exploit the medical vulnerability of service members. It’s easy money in the eyes of Fauci and his constituents. No doubt these events will be etched into history as some of the most lackluster policy decisions in modern day governance. This is an unfortunate time to be a service member, because people’s families and livelihoods are at stake while this war is waged over our heads. Globalization will inevitably bring out the anti-Christ, and the truth is technology has come far enough to carry out a globalist agenda. Stay inquisitive in the word of God, and the world around you.