U.S and G7 Summit Partners Endorse ‘Global Network Approach’ To Pandemic Preparedness And Prevention.

The U.S and its G7 allies recently signed an agreement to improve pandemic preparedness, focusing on “collaborative surveillance” and “predictable quick reaction.”

Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos met with G7 colleagues in Berlin, Germany, on May 19 and 20 to explore ways to “advance a global network strategy to boost pandemic monitoring and response skills and capacities.”

Germany, Canada, France, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union make up the G7, an informal meeting of seven countries.

The G7 accord, issued on May 20, stated, “We intend to cultivate an upgraded network for pandemic preparation with regional and national nodes on all continents.”

The health ministers said that the globe is still “insufficiently” prepared for future pandemics, and that improving preparation is vital for a speedier response to outbreaks.

As part of its coordinated surveillance effort, the pact vowed to improve “integrated, interoperable, and multidisciplinary, cross-sector surveillance capabilities and capacities” amongst member nations.

The concept also includes having “swiftly available” measures like immunizations and non-pharmacological therapies that responders, such as governments, may obtain.

To achieve the goal, the ministers agreed to support international organizations such as the World Health Organization with technical, political, and financial assistance.

In addition, the ministers said that the WHO should be given the right to make key epidemiological signals public “proactively and urgently.”

The group’s stance is similar to that of US President Joe Biden, whose administration advocated for changes to the WHO’s governing laws that would allow Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus to declare a public health emergency in any country based on any evidence he chooses.

The suggested 13 revisions were sent to the WHO in January for consideration at the 75th World Health Assembly (WHA), which took place in Geneva, Switzerland, from May 22 to 24.

The WHO’s decision-making body is the World Health Assembly. Delegations from all 194 member nations attend the yearly meeting. Its primary purpose is to establish the organization’s policies.

One of the proposed changes eliminates a requirement in Section 9 of the International Health Regulations (IHR) that WHO “consult with and seek verification” from officials in a country where a health crisis is suspected before making any public announcements.

The same amendment states that “WHO may consider reports from sources other than notifications or consultations” from the suspected issue country.

In the event that the nation with the suspected problem does not comply within 48 hours, a proposed modification to Section 10 mandates that the WHO “must, where warranted by the scale of the public health risk, promptly communicate with other nations the information accessible to it.”

Member nations will promote standardization of common procedures to enable predictable swift response, according to the G7 deal, while also boosting WHO’s response capacity on a national, regional, and global level.

“The IHR emphasizes the importance that country-level preparedness and response capacity may play in the world’s ability to effectively respond to health emergencies that cross borders,” the health ministers stated in a May 20 communiqué.

“As a result, we endorse improving the IHR through targeted revisions in an open process, as suggested by the Working Group on Strengthening WHO Preparedness and Response to Health Emergencies (WGPR) report to be discussed at the 75th World Health Assembly.”

Duclos praised the WHO for its contribution in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in his remarks at the World Health Assembly on May 23.

“Not being appropriately prepared has devastating health, economic, and societal consequences. That is why Canada supports the creation of a new global mechanism to improve readiness,” he added.

“This is also why organizations like the World Health Organization are so vital. Since its inception, the WHO has played a critical role in worldwide health cooperation, and much more so since the outbreak of this pandemic.”

“The WHO, in Canada’s opinion, must be able to continue in this position.” As the pandemic enters its third year, one thing is obvious than ever: the world needs a strong WHO. A strong WHO, like other international institutions, requires long-term funding, transparency, and accountability,” he noted.

The WHO aggressively recommended nations not to limit travel from China in the early days of the pandemic.

Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada’s senior public health officer and a member of a WHO committee, issued the same advice in Canada, which was an anomaly among many other nations that imposed travel restrictions from China.

The WHO advises against travel restrictions on China, Tam said at a House of Commons committee on Feb. 5, 2020, adding that “China posted the viral genome extremely fast.” What are they expecting to gain from it? I believe the goal is to help China.”

According to a study released by the United Kingdom government in June, China has been using both forceful and covert ways to take control of multilateral organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and use them to modify policy.

Meanwhile, the World Health Organization (WHO) has launched talks on a new international treaty on pandemic preparedness, response, and prevention.

Tedros stated in a December press release that the treaty’s goal is to “strengthen the global health architecture in order to preserve and promote the well-being of all people.”

“This is for your own safety.” I’m sure we’ll be hearing that quite a bit in the coming years considering this policy change is a full course meal for these globalists. By refining a global network approach to plandemic ‘prevention and response’, they’ve practically paved a road to mass persecution. How could this happen one might ask? Obviously this tyranny is the result of COVID-19. But is COVID-19 the result of natural gain of function, or manipulation by NIH scientists? With that question being asked, what is the relationship between said NIH scientists and the globalists continuing to implement predatory policy that effects the entire globe?

From the looks of it, this policy change could result in some seriously dangerous events occurring; if a country claims it’s not experiencing a pandemic that the World Health Organization raises concern about, they are to alert neighboring countries about the current circumstances. Moving forward from there, we could see some of those old blue hats setting up checkpoints to ensure civilians are quarantined. We all know where this rabbit hole leads, dystopia; With that being said, it’s hard to find meaning in life these days. If you’re not a bible believing Christian, you may find it interesting to know that meaning stems from responsibility. To pick up your cross and take responsibility for your thoughts and actions is to choose life. We refuse to be molded into a state of moral relativity, because God’s standard is absolute. The least an intelligent atheist could do is acknowledge and respect that. From this point forward it’s us against the world it seems. Stay inquisitive in the word of God, and the world around you.

UK Parents Feeling Cornered As Sex Education Is Forced Upon Children Far Too Young; Reprobate Legislators And Faithless Society.

Wales will implement required sex education programs that would “gradually empower learners” in themes including equity, sex, gender, and sexuality from a young age, but activists are pushing the government to the High Court to get the mandatory part removed.

Kim Isherwood, the chair of the Public Child Protection Wales group, has initiated a legal action on behalf of 5,000 parents and grandparents to reverse a Labour-led administration proposal to make a new level of Religious and Sex Education (RSE) lectures mandatory.

They claim that children as young as three will be taught “sensitive and potentially inappropriate issues” like gender ideology, and that parents would be disenfranchised by “being denied their time-honoured right to remove their kid from sex education.”

According to The Epoch Times, Isherwood anticipates hearing from the court in early June.

Professor David Paton, who has claimed that such public measures have little or no influence on decreasing early pregnancy and can even increase early sexual activity, has backed the lawsuit, which was initially revealed in late April.

Isherwood and the organization oppose Wales’ sex education legislation, calling it a “war on children” that differs from the stand-alone courses that students and parents are accustomed to.

“Concerned at the way national and local governments have often failed children in terms of safety and education,” says Public Child Protection Wales, a parent-led nonprofit organization. Their goal is to get the Relationships and Sexuality Education Code (RSE) removed from the Curriculum and Assessment (Wales) Act 2021, which goes into effect in September.

RSE will be made a legislative requirement in the new Welsh curriculum, which will be implemented in 2022 and will “gradually empower learners at developmentally appropriate levels,” according to the Welsh government.

It emphasizes that “developmentally appropriate learning” is “a legal necessity,” meaning that “children shall receive learning that is suitable to their age and maturity.”

It went on to say that it is devoted to covering all aspects of relationships, including rights, equality, sex, gender, sexuality, bodies, body image, sexual health, well-being, violence, safety, and support.

Curriculum material in RSE must “be inclusive and represent diversity” across all learning strands, according to the report.

It goes on to say, “It must involve learning that promotes learners’ knowledge and understanding of other identities, viewpoints, and values, as well as a diversity of relationships, gender, and sexuality, including LGBTQ+ lifestyles.”

According to the Welsh government, the RSE follows the principles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which states that all children and young people have the right to receive high-quality, comprehensive, and inclusive education on relationships and sexuality.

The sex education legislation was criticized in December for nearly completely removing the word “sex” from its curriculum, as well as the phrases “male,” “female,” “boys,” “girls,” “straight,” and “heterosexual.”

“The risk to youngsters is that they get very confused,” Isherwood said. “They will receive information that their minds are not ready for.” She went on to say that parents are informed RSE is “age and developmentally appropriate,” but she believes there is no evaluation method or scientific declaration to back up this claim.

The Port Talbot mother of two also expressed concern for children with autism, believing that they may be more susceptible to gender dogma. Isherwood holds a BSc in criminology and social policy as well as a master’s in applied criminal justice and criminology.

“I’ve spent the last 15 years advocating for children’s rights and inclusion. “Sex education is a significant part of what I do, so standing here and saying this is bad is very, really wrong,” she added.

“It is regrettable that this organization continues to propagate erroneous and misleading statements about Relationships and Sexuality Education in Wales’s new curriculum,” a spokeswoman for the Welsh government said in a statement.

“RSE is meant to protect all of our children and young people by assisting them in developing knowledge, skills, and behaviors that will help them defend themselves and improve their well-being throughout their lives,” he stated.

“A number of renowned organizations, like the NSPCC, the Children’s Commissioner’s Office, and Welsh Women’s Aid, have supported these improvements,” he continued.

Public Child Protection Wales comments about RSE were false and misleading, according to the Welsh government.

Professor of industrial economics at Nottingham University Business School David Paton, whose work on adolescent pregnancy has been highly recognized in academic literature, expressed reservations about the RSE ideas in Wales through email to The Epoch Times.

Paton said last month that the Scottish SNP government’s sex education lectures featured “extremely alarming” information that may normalize teenage sexual engagement. Paton has provided a witness statement in the action brought by Public Child Protection Wales.

“Knowing how everyone are entitled to safe and pleasant relationships and identifying the role consenting sexual activity plays within healthy relationships,” according to the Welsh RSE Guidance for 11-year-olds, and “understanding the legal age of consent” are critical goals.

“For youngsters aged 11 and above, this is under the Sexual Health section. “The clear concern is that the message is being sent that “are entitled” applies even to minors in sexual interactions,” Paton explained.

“There is limited evidence that educational curriculum-based interventions alone are beneficial in improving sexual and reproductive health outcomes for adolescents,” Paton said, citing a research published in the Cochrane Review of evidence.

“Another critical issue in the recommendations is the lack of knowledge of the critical role of parents in ensuring that their children get SRE [sex and relationships education] materials. For example, there appears to be no method for parents to opt their children out of what they consider to be unsuitable SRE or content offered at a young age,” he noted.

It’s wild how the very freedom thousands have fought and died for over the years is being stripped from us and nobody knows how to properly articulate that this is wrong. What makes America a free place is the fact that you can have a family immigrate here from a foreign country and they can continue to carry our their cultural tradition and raise their children to adopt a similar world view to their own. What we’re seeing in America today is a political party basically saying you’re a counterfeit individual if you don’t subscribe to their ideological framework. People want to find financial stability here, and carry out their lives peacefully so they can create generational wealth. That does not mean that we want to volunteer our children for your psychological experiments regarding early sexual education.

It’s hard for all of us to wrap our heads around the fact that God created each and every one of us with the capability of enduring these terrible times. We’re meant to be strong, intelligent, and compassionate individuals as followers of Christ; And that means that we’ll stick out like a sore thumb. Not in a good way however, during these times people will mock what is holy. Society has molded into something that’s caused people to hate the truth. When you don’t believe in a higher power that means morality is inherently subjective; Leading one down a nihilistic path. The truth found in life is morality. Meaning in life is found when you get your morals in line, and Jesus is the one who instructed us to conduct our selves as children of God. The sermon on the mount for example, is our call to take these instructions deadly serious. Praise God, stay inquisitive in the word of God and the world around you.