Un-reliable News Source: FakeBook, Brighton, Tweeter, Gab, and YouTube

Think one-world currency, one-world government, and one-world religion, just like the Bible foretold would happen. It will be like World War II on steroids, with the targets being not just Jews but the entirety of humanity – a global genocide utilizing all of the technology that was developed after the war.

Jesus’ argument to the Pharisees was logical: a kingdom that is at cross-purposes with itself will fall. 

The world is already on the brink of collapse so the timing is perfect for World War III, almost like it was planned this way all along.
As the dominoes continue to fall in rapid succession, it will become even clearer how serious this all is – but at that point it will already be too late to do anything about it….“This has absolutely NOTHING to do with a vaccine,”

The Government Has Turn 11 Military Bases Inside The United States Into Quarantine Camps. Humanity Is Now Facing a “Perfect Storm”, and What We Have Witnessed so Far Is Just the Beginning…

If this coronavirus outbreak is not a serious threat, then why is the U.S. government preparing to quarantine victims all over America? As you will see below, 11 U.S. military bases located close to major airports are being converted into “quarantine centers” for potential patients. When I first learned about this, I was greatly alarmed, because we have all seen what is going on in China right now. People are literally being physically dragged out of their homes and are being forcibly relocated to “mass quarantine camps” with hordes of other very sick people. Sadly, many of them will never come out of those camps alive. If this virus starts spreading like wildfire here in the United States, is it possible that something similar could start happening here?

The vast majority of the confirmed cases are still in China, but over the last couple of weeks, the number of cases in the rest of the world has escalated dramatically.

Back on January 20th, there were only 4 confirmed cases outside of China and now there are 464. At this point, there are victims in at least 28 different countries, and that number is almost certain to keep growing.

“Between Klaus’ Great Reset, the roll-out of the CDC Green Zone plan, the coordinated virus tracking, and world leaders who are all stating we need a one-world solution, we seem to be headed down a very slippery slope of not only repeating history, but repeating it on an unprecedented scale.”

“We must obey God rather than men” (Act 5:29; cf. Matt. 28:18-20). When Christians disobey governing authorities, we are not rejecting authority per se, but only those unjust perversions which have crept in. The general rule of Scripture is that when human authority commands us to disobey God, then we have not only the right, but the duty, to disobey that unjust law. In these instances, the believer is submitting to God’s authority above all.

Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings

This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings.^1,2  This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings. The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data. Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available. Please check the CDC website periodically for updates.

What is the Shielding Approach¹?

The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting.^1,2They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.

Current evidence indicates that older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19.³In most humanitarian settings, older population groups make up a small percentage of the total population.^4,5 For this reason, the shielding approach suggests physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population to prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-term containment measures among the general population.

In theory, shielding may serve its objective to protect high-risk populations from disease and death. However, implementation of the approach necessitates strict adherence^1,6,7, to protocol. Inadvertent introduction of the virus into a green zone may result in rapid transmission among the most vulnerable populations the approach is trying to protect.

A summary of the shielding approach described by Favas is shown in Table 1. See Guidance for the prevention of COVID-19 infections among high-risk individuals in low-resource, displaced and camp and camp-like settings ^1,2 for full details.

Table 1: Summary of the Shielding Approach¹

Level

Movement/ Interactions

Household (HH) Level:

A specific room/area designated for high-risk individuals who are physically isolated from other HH members.

Low-risk HH members should not enter the green zone. If entry is necessary, it should be done only by healthy individuals after washing hands and using face coverings. Interactions should be at a safe distance (approx. 2 meters). Minimum movement of high-risk individuals outside the green zone. Low-risk HH members continue to follow social distancing and hygiene practices outside the house.

Neighborhood Level:

A designated shelter/group of shelters (max 5-10 households), within a small camp or area where high-risk members are grouped together. Neighbors “swap” households to accommodate high-risk individuals.

Same as above

Camp/Sector Level:

A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together.

One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.

Operational Considerations

The shielding approach requires several prerequisites for effective implementation. Several are addressed, including access to healthcare and provision of food. However, there are several prerequisites which require additional considerations. Table 2 presents the prerequisites or suggestions as stated in the shielding guidance document (column 1) and CDC presents additional questions and considerations alongside these prerequisites (column 2).

Table 2: Suggested Prerequisites per the shielding documents and CDC’s Operational Considerations for Implementation

Suggested Prerequisites

*As stated in the shielding document*

Considerations as suggested by CDC

• Each green zone has a dedicated latrine/bathing facility for high-risk individuals

• The shielding approach advises against any new facility construction to establish green zones; however, few settings will have existing shelters or communal facilities with designated latrines/bathing facilities to accommodate high-risk individuals. In these settings, most latrines used by HHs are located outside the home and often shared by multiple HHs.
• If dedicated facilities are available, ensure safety measures such as proper lighting, handwashing/hygiene infrastructure, maintenance and disinfection of latrines.
• Ensure facilities can accommodate high-risk individuals with disabilities, children and separate genders at the neighborhood/camp-level.
• To minimize external contact, each green zone should include able-bodied high-risk individuals capable of caring for residents who have disabilities or are less mobile.  Otherwise, designate low-risk individuals for these tasks, preferably who have recovered from confirmed COVID-19 and are assumed to be immune.

• This may be difficult to sustain, especially if the caregivers are also high risk. As caregivers may often will be family members, ensure that this strategy is socially or culturally acceptable.
• Currently, we do not know if prior infection confers immunity.
• The green zone and living areas for high-risk residents should be aligned with minimum humanitarian (SPHERE) standards.⁶
• The shielding approach requires strict adherence to infection, prevention and control (IPC) measures. They require, uninterrupted availability of soap, water, hygiene/cleaning supplies, masks or cloth face coverings, etc. for all individuals in green zones. Thus, it is necessary to ensure minimum public health standards⁶ are maintained and possibly supplemented to decrease the risk of other outbreaks outside of COVID-19. Attaining and maintaining minimum SPHERE⁶ standards is difficult in these settings for the general population.^8,9,10 Users should consider that provision of services and supplies to high risk individuals could be at the expense of low-risk residents, putting them at increased risk for other outbreaks.
• Monitor and evaluate the implementation of the shielding approach.

• Monitoring protocols will need to be developed for each type of green zone.
• Dedicated staff need to be identified to monitor each green zone. Monitoring includes both adherence to protocols and potential adverse effects or outcomes due to isolation and stigma. It may be necessary to assign someone within the green zone, if feasible, to minimize movement in/out of green zones.
• Men and women, and individuals with tuberculosis (TB), severe immunodeficiencies, or dementia should be isolated separately
• Multiple green zones would be needed to achieve this level of separation, each requiring additional inputs/resources. Further considerations include challenges of accommodating different ethnicities, socio-cultural groups, or religions within one setting.
• Community acceptance and involvement in the design and implementation
• Even with community involvement, there may be a risk of stigmatization.^11,12 Isolation/separation from family members, loss of freedom and personal interactions may require additional psychosocial support structures/systems. See section on additional considerations below.
• High-risk minors should be accompanied into isolation by a single caregiver who will also be considered a green zone resident in terms of movements and contacts with those outside the green zone.
• Protection measures are critical to implementation. Ensure there is appropriate, adequate, and acceptable care of other minors or individuals with disabilities or mental health conditions who remain in the HH if separated from their primary caregiver.
• Green zone shelters should always be kept clean. Residents should be provided with the necessary cleaning products and materials to clean their living spaces.
• High-risk individuals will be responsible for cleaning and maintaining their own living space and facilities. This may not be feasible for persons with disabilities or decreased mobility.¹¹ Maintaining hygiene conditions in communal facilities is difficult during non-outbreak settings.^7,8,9 consequently it may be necessary to provide additional human resource support.
• Green zones should be more spacious in terms of shelter area per capita than the surrounding camp/sector, even at the cost of greater crowding of low-risk people.
• Ensure that targeting high-risk individuals does not negate mitigation measures among low-risk individuals (physical distancing in markets or water points, where feasible, etc.). Differences in space based on risk status may increase the potential risk of exposure among the rest of the low-risk residents and may be unacceptable or impracticable, considering space limitations and overcrowding in many settings.

• 
  Watchman’s Warning: Mass Deaths Are Coming To mRNA Kill Shot Misinformed Participants,We Can Thank Google’s Dr.Gates
  By SRH, “Even after a single injection, everyone who gets an mRNA injection will die within three to five years.” World-class scientist who used to be Bill Gates’ immunization specialist raised the alarm, predicting a “wave of morbidity” and “mortality” among COVID mRNA vaccine users. Ex-Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation scientist and immunization specialist Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche has issued a warning that populations worldwide will soon see a “completely unprecedented” decline. Bossche projects that the death toll will be “up to 30–40% in highly vaccinated countries.” Leading experts alerted the public during an interview with vaccine expert and researcher Steve Kirsch. He further emphasizes that since COVID will always mutate, mRNA injections are not a viable treatment. “The mutations are not limited to spike protein, which indicates enhanced activity of CTLs (cytotoxic T cells) to diminish viral infectiousness,” Kirsch…
• 
  Watchman: Safe and Effective the Health Harm Budget for the COVID Vaccine in Japan Was Boosted by an Astounding 110 Times When Compared to Earlier Predictions, According to the Watchman A Large Number of Deaths, or Illnesses, Is What They Expect and It’s Coming!
• 
  Watchman’s Warning: One of This Plandemic are Going to Work and People Will be Place in Camps,Its Just a Matter of Time
  SRH: A New “Health Alert” From the CDC Calls for the Isolation of People Who Have Contracted Avian Flu. After an h5n1 Infection in a Texas Farmhand, the CDC Issued a New Warning About Avian Flu. Following the confirmation of a human bird flu infection in a dairy farm worker in Texas earlier this month, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a warning to state health agencies and clinicians earlier on April 5. Health care providers should be aware of the federal agency’s “updated recommendations” regarding “instructions for infection prevention and control measures, using personal protective equipment (PPE), testing, antiviral treatment, patient investigations, and monitoring of exposed persons,” which include those who have been “exposed to sick or dead wild and domesticated animals and livestock with suspected or confirmed infection” with H5N1 avian influenza. This information…
• 
  Finally, the reasons why the coordinated launching of the COVID-19 PLAN-demic and Simultaneously also of the 5G  Radio Microwave Radiation Frequency Pulses Network are coming into focus.
• 
  Brave Canadian Doctors – Whistleblowers

Evil governmental system. The Bible associates this end-times ruler with a terrible beast in Revelation and in Daniel, The day is here– get ready…

Please Do Not Post Hnewswire Articles on Brighteon, Gab, Parler, FaceBook, Reddit or Twatter Social Media Platform, We Are Not Comfortable With Their Anti-Christian — Anti-American Nazi Philosophy. StevieRay Hansen

After all, as Orwell himself wrote in 1984, “One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship.”

I Have Never Seen The Righteous Forsaken or Begging For Rain

Luciferian Death Cult

Mr.Evil, a.k.a Dr.Death ( Dr.Fauci ) agrees with the White House and Biden himself,saying vaccination mandates should be the next step.

Who is to blame? Corrupt politicians or the stupid people who vote for them

FakeBook, Parler Tweeter Gab, and YouTube Are Un-Reliable News Sources

Ask The Blind Man ,He Saw it All

Source: HNewsWire HNewsWire HNewsWire HNewsWire HNewsWire

StevieRay Hansen
Editor, HNewsWire.com

HNewsWire@protonmail.com