H News

search

Pfizer Continue to Mislead

Pfizer, Pfizer Continue to Mislead

Attorney General Ken Paxton Continues Lawsuit Against Pfizer for Knowingly Misrepresenting the Efficacy of the COVID-19 Vaccine

/

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 8, 2025 www.texasattorneygeneral.gov PRESS OFFICE: (512) 463-2050 Communications@oag.texas.gov Attorney General Ken Paxton Continues Lawsuit Against Pfizer for Knowingly Misrepresenting the Efficacy of the COVID-19 Vaccine AUSTIN – Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a notice of appeal to continue his lawsuit against Pfizer, Inc., for its unlawful misrepresentations concerning the COVID-19 vaccine after a district court dismissed the case. In November 2023, Attorney General Paxton sued Pfizer for unlawfully misrepresenting the effectiveness and safety of the company’s COVID-19 vaccine. Further, Pfizer conspired with social media platforms to censor criticism and label posts containing truthful information about its vaccine as “misinformation.” In December 2024, a federal district judge dismissed the lawsuit, claiming that the federal government had given Pfizer immunity through the Public Readiness and Emergency Act. Today, Attorney General Paxton filed a notice that we will […]

Loading

Pfizer, Pfizer Continue to Mislead

Watchman: Federal Judge Rules For Pfizer In Lawsuit Over Company’s COVID-19 Kill Shot Vaccine–Don’t Count TX AG Paxton Out Just Yet, Its NOT Over…

/

BY HNewsWire Texas’ case against Pfizer was dismissed by a federal judge because the COVID-19 pandemic emergency shields Pfizer. In his Dec. 30 order, U.S. District Judge Sam R. Cummings stated several laws protect Pfizer from vaccine efficacy misrepresentations. “The Court finds that as a matter of law under the circumstances of this case, the Defendant is entitled to immunity under the PREP Act,” Cummings wrote.Story continues below ad. The PREP Act and Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act supersede Texas’ charges, he added. In 2023, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Pfizer in county court for misrepresenting its COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial results.Pfizer and its partner claimed the vaccination was 95% effective against COVID-19, although they used only two months of study data. BY SRH Texas’ case against Pfizer was dismissed by a federal judge because the COVID-19 pandemic emergency

Loading

Pfizer Continue to Mislead, Satan Soldiers

Satan Soldiers at Pfizer Continue to Mislead the Public About COVID Vaccine

/

There Hype Fails to Mention the Facts… Pfizer recently announced that its Covid vaccine was more than 90 percent “effective” at preventing covid-19. Shortly after this announcement, Moderna announced that its Covid vaccine was 94.5 percent “effective” at preventing covid-19. Unlike the flu vaccine, which is one shot, both Covid vaccines require two shots given three to four weeks apart. Hidden toward the end of both announcements, were the definitions of “effective.” Both trials have a treatment group that received the vaccine and a control group that did not. All the trial subjects were covid negative prior to the start of the trial. The analysis for both trials was performed when a target number of “cases” were reached. “Cases” were defined by positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. There was no information about the cycle number for the PCR tests. There was no information about whether the “cases” had symptoms or

Loading

Scroll to Top