The Supreme Court's ruling on Tuesday was that the Justices did not tell Texas what to do or not do. This is a small difference that PBS's writers seem to have missed. Of course, AI will soon replace them. Here are two points of view that Stephen Vladeck, a law professor at UT and an expert on PBS, made about constitutional issues and Governor Abbott's statement of invasion. This will help you understand what the corporate media is trying to teach you.

As I thought they would, they are going to argue about what "invasion" means. For Professor Vladeck, it's clear:

The first is that it's clear that an invasion of refugee seekers, no matter how many we're talking about, was not what the founders meant when they used the word.

Of course. It's clear that the founders did not want an army of people looking for refuge, right? What does Black's Law Dictionary mean by "invasion"?

SRH:

The professor conveniently forgot some simple rules of constitutional law. The Constitution is meant to limit the power of the central government, not the power of the states. In fact, the 10th Amendment, which isn't used very often, says that when the Constitution is silent, we respect the rights of the states; we don't look in "founding or other materials for ideas." The 10th Amendment is just one sentence:

The Constitution doesn't give the United States any powers; it only says that the States can't do certain things. Those powers are then left to the States or the people.