Watchman Sees Death: saRNA Self-Amplifying RNA Kill Shots Are Coming

HNewsWire: Kill Shots

The next generation of RNA-based injections will contain self-amplifying RNA (saRNA). If the term “self-amplifying RNA” sounds frightening, it should. It likely brings to mind images of scientific experiments running amok.
As discussed in a previous article, “mRNA vaccines” are not made with messenger RNA but with modified RNA (modRNA). These so-called vaccines are actually gene therapy products (GTPs), as modRNA hijacks our cells’ software. We have no possibility at all of gaining influence on modRNA (or saRNA) after it has been injected.
You have to wonder how many people were vaccinated while in the hospital and under anesthesia and now have serious health problems or have died. Also, it’s interesting that both Moderna and Pfizer have these deadly vaccines, but only Pfizer is being thrown under the bus when they both do the same thing.
We know Fauci and Gates have massive financial ties to Moderna. I also believe this was tested for 10 years between Bill Gates, Fauci, and others. Fauci wouldn’t have pushed it if he didn’t know it would work the way Gates and the elites wanted it to. This was all part of the depopulation, so I do believe it was tested in other countries, and other countries say people died when they were injected by Gates.

Why the change to saRNA?

saRNA is the political solution: the same amount (or even more) of antigen in only one shot! The public will likely be told that due to the regular mutations of the virus, yearly adaptation boosters will continue to be necessary.

Numerous preclinical and clinical studies applying saRNA technology have already been undertaken. A 2023 review in the journal Pathogens touts saRNA vaccines as “improved mRNA vaccines.” The journal Vaccines published a summary of five years of saRNA study findings. Once the requisite clinical studies are finished, these new vaccines can be approved for use. It can be expected that this process will be as quick as it was for the COVID-19 vaccines. The approval process will become simpler, as it could be argued that the technique (modRNA in lipid nanoparticles) is already approved and that only the modRNA sequence is different. Hence, these new saRNA vaccines could be injected into an unsuspecting public at any time.
BioNTech did tests with saRNA (BNT162c2) but eventually focused on modRNA (BNT162b2). Arcturus Therapeutics was the first to say (in 2022) that its COVID-19 saRNA vaccine candidate ARCT-154 met the primary efficacy endpoint in a phase-3 study. It is now the most advanced saRNA vaccine in trials.

In the Arcturus Therapeutics study, participants received two doses, each containing 5 micrograms of saRNA. This is far less than the modRNA concentrations used by Pfizer-BioNTech (30 micrograms/shot) and Moderna (100 micrograms/shot).

saRNA injections will not solve the problems with modRNA injections.

As we discovered with modRNA, the spike protein is poisonous to our bodies. We know that modRNA results in the production of more spike protein than would be available during a natural infection, and we know that repeated boosters cause immune tolerance.

Compared to modRNA, a small amount of saRNA results in an increased amount of antigen produced.

The “dose” of viral antigen that current and future RNA-based vaccines bring about will show large fluctuations from one individual to the next, depending on the cell type producing the desired antigen, genetic predisposition, medical history, and other factors. This fact alone should prohibit the use of RNA-based injections as vaccines for healthy people.

Another Dubious Step Forward: From Linear to Circular SaRNA

As RNA-degrading enzymes (RNases) are known to act from both ends of linear RNA, scientists tried to prevent these enzymes from doing their natural duty—degrading mRNAs that are no longer needed—and created circular RNA. Increased stability and translation effectiveness followed by increased production of the desired antigen were the results of this.

But is this really another step forward? Consider the negative effects of long-lasting antigen presentation. Because there are more antigens in the body after one injection of saRNA, whether it is linear or circular, may have the same bad effects as multiple (booster) injections of modRNA.

Long-Term Presentation of an Antigen Is Known to Cause Immune Tolerance

After getting vaccinated, our bodies generate antibodies, mostly immunoglobulin G (IgG), including IgG1 and IgG4.

Vaccinated individuals show an antibody class switch starting with the third COVID-19 injection (the first booster). This is from inflammatory IgG1 antibodies (that fight the spike protein) to non-inflammatory IgG4 antibodies (that tolerate the spike protein). Elevated levels of IgG4 antibodies, in the long run, will exhaust the immune system, causing immune tolerance. This may explain COVID-19 “breakthrough” infections, reduced immune response to other viral and bacterial infections, and reactivation of latent viral infections. It may also cause autoimmune diseases and the uncontrolled growth of cancer.
Notably, long-lasting IgG4 responses have been strongly linked to RNA-based injections. On the other hand, people who had a COVID-19 infection before getting vaccinated did not have higher IgG4 levels, even after getting a shot.

This observation clearly discredits the World Health Organization’s policy that—assuming people have no immunity against novel viruses (completely ignoring the reality of cross-immunity)—people should be vaccinated before they come into contact with the virus.

RNA-Based Injections Are Recognized as Gene Therapy Products

Incomprehensibly, RNA-based injections for protecting against infectious diseases were named “vaccines,” which allowed exclusion from the strict regulations for gene therapy products (GTPs). Again, this happened without providing the public with any scientific justification.

Details on the regulatory issues of RNA-based vaccines are reported in excellent and comprehensive reviews by Guerriaud & Kohli and Helene Banoun.
In 2014, Uğur Şahin, already CEO of BioNTech, co-wrote an article published in Nature about developing a new class of drugs, “mRNA-based therapeutics.” The authors wrote, “One would expect the classification of an mRNA drug to be a biologic, gene therapy, or somatic cell therapy.”
In 2021, the author of correspondence printed in Genes & Immunity described RNA-based vaccines created by Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech as “a breakthrough in the field of gene therapy” and “a great opportunity for the FDA and EMA to revise the drug development pipeline to make it more flexible and less time-consuming.”

Two disturbing pieces of information have now come to light:

  • The contaminating DNA results from Pfizer-BioNTech’s change in the manufacturing process after finishing the BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) Clinical Trial C4591001. In the beginning (Process 1), in-vitro transcription from synthetic DNA and PCR (polymerase chain reaction) amplified Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA. However, to scale up manufacturing (see rapid responses to this BMJ study), modRNA-encoding DNA was cloned into bacterial plasmids (Process 2). Put simply, the clinical trial was run on process-1 lots, but the world’s populations received process-2 lots.

This implies that those who consented to receive a vaccination received an injection of a substance other than the one that regulatory organizations had approved and to which they had given their consent.

  • Detailed sequence analyses revealed that the plasmid DNA in the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 shots contains a 72-base pair sequence of the Simian Virus-40 (SV40) promoter, which is well-known to enhance transport of the plasmid DNA into the nucleus.

It is now irrefutable that the RNA-based COVID-19 injections contain DNA.

RNA-based technology—especially when applied as vaccines to healthy individuals—is unjustifiable and unethical. Independent from the tragic number of adverse events or excess mortality rates, it is the technique that is the issue, and the same problems will occur in all future RNA-based “vaccines.”

  1. RNA-based “vaccine” technology goes against the central idea of evolution over the past millions of years. Although modRNA and saRNA produce antigens without stopping, natural messenger RNA (mRNA) needs to have a short lifespan in order for cells to work properly and in a healthy way. (The short lifespan of mRNA allows our cells to adapt as quickly as possible to changing circumstances and avoid the production of unnecessary proteins.)
  2. A premise of RNA-based “vaccine” technology—that all of our body cells have to produce a foreign viral protein—goes against fundamental biological principles, like distinguishing between our own cells and foreign invaders, and will result in our immune system attacking our own cells.
  3. RNA can be reverse-transcribed into DNA even without the presence of the enzyme reverse transcriptase (i.e., by LINE1 elements present in our genome or DNA). Contaminating DNA (in RNA-based vaccines) is the rule rather than the exception. As both RNA and DNA can be integrated into the human genome, the so-called “vaccines” based on RNA technology are actually gene therapy products.

It is in no way justifiable to subject RNA-based GTPs for medical use to strict controls but to exclude RNA-based GTPs, called vaccines, from these regulations even though they are intended for most of the human population. Even in an emergency, no one should be forced to be injected with any substance—least of all by politicians.

What Did COVID-19 Teach Us About Science, Politics, and Society?

For many years, scientists dreamed of manipulating human “software”—that is, DNA or RNA. Ethically, manipulating DNA has always been taboo. In retrospect, COVID-19 may represent the dawn of RNA-based “vaccines” and the end of the taboo against manipulating human DNA.

In a 2023 commentary in the Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, the authors wrote that from the earliest days of the pandemic, it was obvious that some influential scientists and their political allies demonized dissenting scientific views and evidence offering a second opinion. Despite contradictory evidence, national politicians “assured the public that they were adopting COVID-19 policies by ‘following the science.’” However, scientific consent was achieved only by suppressing scientific debate.

Remember: When questions are allowed, it is science; when they are not, it is propaganda.

So-called “experts” selected by politicians told us that we must be vaccinated to be able to fight a new respiratory virus. This contradicts the science of the human immune system. Our immune systems are dynamic and can clear a virus they have never encountered; they can also develop cross-immunity to identify variants even if the virus mutates. However, since RNA-based vaccines will produce a single antigen, our immune system is deprived of the possibility of developing cross-immunity against virus variants. This applies, in particular, to respiratory viruses exhibiting a high mutation rate. In the long run, this will lead to an increase in both the frequency and the severity of infectious diseases. Thus, politicians interested in protecting the population against future infections would be well advised to offer health programs that strengthen the immune system before seasonal infections.

Scientists haven’t the faintest idea of how to direct modRNA or saRNA to a specific cell type or how to stop the translation of administered RNA. However, they continue to study how the stability of injected RNA and the amount of generated antigen can be further increased. The current development of RNA-based vaccine technology reminds me of the poem “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice,” which German poet Johann Wolfgang von Goethe wrote over 200 years ago:

“The spirits, whom I’ve careless raised, are not spellbound by my power.”

Here is how 'they' carry out their evil schemes. The hourly flow of wicked media terrifies their victims, and when their prey refuses to cooperate, they frighten them by covering their mouths and strapping them down. Soon after, a man with a "piercing" appears out of nowhere, donning a fake white hat, claiming to be our savior. I find them repulsive.

Please, Father, in Jesus' name, I command you to stop interfering with our DNA and RNA. You were the one who meticulously planned and built our bodies, and we will destroy any plot by the devil to destroy what you made. Dear Father, I give thanks to you because your word promises that our enemies will fail if they try to harm us. This promise gives me peace, and I am grateful. Please, God.

This is the diabolical mind of the mad scientists who are running loose without a moral foundation, experimenting with a system that has unknown potential and will be born in future generations. What we see here, at the present time in world history, is what secularized civilization is capable of when reason is lost, commonsense is lost, morals are shelved, and God is relegated to the shelf. The major factor that is not included in the outcome is the stupidity index of those who are leading the parade, having captured the power and $’s.
They are leading us to a disastrous endgame, and their prowess is going to be “rewarded” when they face their Creator. But then, that is not much of a threat to those who are accountable only to themselves. but that fatal error will be the big surprise—especially when they cannot take all of their worldly gains behind them.
Ah, that will be the ultimate justice.
The theepochtimes, Klaus Steger, Ph.D. contributed to the article

We need your help. Please donate. Because of HNewsWire, expenses and the truth are both substantial. I need your assistance. Please Donate.




Beef in Bulk: Half, Quarter, or Eighth Cow Shipped to Your Door Anywhere within Texas Only

We do not mRNA vaccinate our cattle, nor will we ever!

Grass Fed, Grass Finished Beef!

Here is a discount code for HNewsWire readers to get 20 percent off first order:


From Our Ranch to Your Table

Order Today



Revelation: A Blueprint for the Great Tribulation

A Watchman Is Awakened


Will Putin Fulfill Biblical Prophecy and Attack Israel?




Editor's Bio

A Long Journey Home Book Cover

A Thrilling Ride

Every once in awhile, a book comes across your path that is impossible to put down. A Long Journey Home is not a casual book that you read in a week or earmark to complete at a later date. Once you begin, cancel your schedule, put your phone on silent, find a quiet place where you cannot be disturbed, and complete the journey. Click Here to Purchase on!

Recent News

Reach People

Place Your Ad Here

Leave a Comment