Watchman: Globalists Like Schwab and His Closest Aides Are “Legitimate Military Targets” Because They Have Been Trying to Take Power Illegally Through a Globalist Coup D’Etat
HNewsWire: Putin is right! And Klaus Schwab, The SOB ‘Days Are Numbered’... God' Is In Control, Take Cover, Mr.Klaus
HNewsWire says that Putin is right. And Klaus Schwab is a jerk whose "days are numbered." God is in charge, so Klaus, hide!
Klaus Schwab, who started the World Economic Forum (WEF), is a "globalist terrorist" who is "holding humanity to ransom," according to Russian President Vladimir Putin, who told the elite that their New World Order had failed and that their "days are numbered."
On October 5, Russian President Vladimir Putin gave a speech at the 20th meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club in Sochi. In his speech, he talked about the tectonic and permanent changes that are happening in the global order.
Putin says that globalists like Schwab and his closest advisers are "legitimate military targets" because they have been trying to illegally take power through a globalist coup d'etat.
At the 2007 Munich Security Conference, sixteen years ago, Putin told Western leaders that multipolarity is the natural type of international system. This made it clear that Russia would be against creating a New World Order based on the international liberal rules-based order that the globalist elite and their liberal politicians in Western democracies are pushing hard for.
Putin says that the moment of truth has come, and the global elite's plans for a New World Order are falling apart right in front of our eyes. Instead, a new multipolar world is rising like a phoenix, with traditional cultures keeping their traditions within their own borders.
Putin Gives Six Principles of Civilization for the World After the NWO
During his speech at Valdai, Putin talked about six rules that Russia wants to follow and invited other countries to join them. Through Sputnik:
"First, we want to live in a world that is open and linked, where no one will ever try to put up barriers to people's ability to talk to each other, be creative, and be wealthy. Putin said, "There must be a place where there are no barriers."
The second concept is that the world should be as different as possible. This diversity should not only be kept, but it should also be the basis of development for everyone.
The Russian head of state says that the third principle is maximum representativeness: "No one has the right or can run the world for or on behalf of other people. "The future is a world where people make decisions together," the president said. Fourth, there should be protection for everyone and a lasting peace that takes into account the needs of both big and small countries. Putin says that to do this, international relations need to be freed from the bloc mindset and the dark legacy of the colonial era and the Cold War.
The fifth concept is that everyone should be treated fairly: "The time of taking advantage of anyone—I've already said this twice—is over. Countries and people know what they want and what they can do, and they are ready to rely on themselves, which makes them stronger. Putin stressed that everyone should be able to enjoy the benefits of modern growth.
The sixth principle is equality. The Russian president says that no one should be forced to follow those who are richer or more powerful if it hurts their own growth and national interests.
"The 'civilizational model' Putin talked about in his speech seems to be based on 'principles' like non-colonial relations, non-patronizing attitudes, and respect for diversity rooted in different traditions," says Paolo Raffone, the director of the CIPI Foundation in Brussels and a strategic analyst. "It will take a lot of work to create new shared international norms based on these principles," he says.
"The Western "rules-based liberal international order" is unilateral, and it could be imposed at a certain time in history by using the power and prominence of a small group of colonial powers that, after the liberal model crisis and civil war (1914–1945), were taken over by a faraway but very powerful country (the US).
In a nutshell, I can say that the "civilizational model" method aims to build a "software" for the world that everyone can use, while the "liberal rules-based order" aims to build "hardware" that is imposed and protected by rules that serve the financial and military hegemony."
Globalists like Schwab and his closest aides are "legitimate military targets" because they have been trying to take power illegally through a globalist coup d'etat.
Contempt for Press Freedoms: US Officials Bar Tucker Carlson From Interviewing Putin
Sidebar:
Authored by Ted Galen Carpenter via AntiWar.com,
Tucker Carlson reports that the U.S. government prevented him from interviewing Russian President Vladimir Putin. Carlson told the Swiss magazine Die Weltwoche that he had sought to arrange an interview with Putin, but U.S. officials blocked him.
“I tried to interview Vladimir Putin, but the U.S. government prevented me from doing so. Think about [the implications],” Carlson told the newspaper on September 24. Worse, according to Carlson, no one in the U.S. news media supported his right as a journalist to report on the Russian leader’s views regarding the Ukraine conflict.
Such obstructionism reflects a growing contempt on the part of officials in the United States and other supposedly liberal democratic countries for freedom of the press. It is merely the latest episode in a lengthening parade of restrictions, ranging from petty to truly alarming. The highest priority targets are critics who dare condemn or even dispute the accounts that Western leaders put forth regarding key foreign policy objectives
European Union governments have been even more brazen than Washington in their efforts to impede critics. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, the EU banned the two most prominent Russian outlets, RT and Sputnik. The official rationale was that those organizations were Kremlin controlled and were disseminating “disinformation” regarding the war in Ukraine. EU officials even ordered the removal of RT and Sputnik material from search engines.
More than 300 million inhabitants of EU countries were thus deprived from accessing Russia’s views about the war or its causes. Conversely, EU authorities did not impose the slightest restrictions on the tsunami of propaganda coming out of Kyiv regarding the war. Such gross imbalance has been a transparent effort to rig public opinion on a major international issue.
U.S. officials have been somewhat more subtle in their efforts to squelch dissenting views, especially on Russia, but they have been bad enough. The FBI, the CIA, and other agencies have engaged in a two-front assault on freedom of the press. One method is to emulate the EU and take direct action against alternative news outlets and other dissenters. The other strategy, which has become increasingly pervasive over the past decade is to pressure or collude with social media platforms to harass, marginalize, or eliminate sources that Washington dislikes. Such censorship by proxy is both insidious and dangerous.
The FBI took a major step toward implementing the first approach in October 2017. FBI leaders created a new Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF) in the bureau’s Counterintelligence Division. The FBI subsequently considered any effort by states designated by the Department of Defense as major adversaries (Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea) to influence American public opinion as a threat to U.S. national security. Targets for suppression were not confined to publications and outlets that were indisputably under the control of one of those hostile powers.
However, censorship by proxy has become by far the U.S. national security state’s preferred method. The U.S. national security apparatus has even actively assisted Volodymr Zelensky’s Ukrainian regime to undermine the constitutional rights of Americans. CNN noted a worrisome revelations in a July 2023 report from the House Judiciary Committee. “The committee says SBU [Ukraine’s top security agency] sent the FBI lists of social media accounts that allegedly ‘spread Russian disinformation,’ and that the FBI then ‘routinely relayed these lists to the relevant social media platforms, which distributed the information internally to their employees in charge of content moderation and enforcement.’”
In other words, the FBI served as a willing conduit and facilitator for Kyiv’s overseas censorship efforts. Moreover, U.S. officials did not make even a minimal effort to vet Kyiv’s allegations before pressuring social media companies to shut down the accounts of targeted organizations and individuals.
Revelations from the so-called Twitter files, confirm the extent of such ideological collusion between federal agencies and social media companies. Among other unhealthy aspects was that the FBI had paid Twitter $3.4 million. In a so-called fact-check, USA Today conceded that “the FBI flagged Twitter accounts the agency believed violated Twitter’s terms of service. Second, another document shows the FBI paid Twitter $3.4 million for Twitter’s processing of information requests the FBI made through the Stored Communications Act.” However, “fact-checker” Molly Stelino concluded that the FBI was not using Twitter for censorship purposes, insisting that “the $3.4 million is unrelated to the FBI flagging accounts.” Such an argument deserves an award for gullibility.
The extent of the government’s collusion campaign was even more apparent because Yoel Roth, the Twitter executive in charge of content moderation and members of his staff met weekly with the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. It is a safe bet that those meetings were not to discuss the weather. Such meetings also cast even more doubt on the allegedly benign nature of the FBI’s $3.4 million payment to Twitter for processing “information requests.” Yet even Roth apparently balked at some of the FBI’s more far-reaching demands. Roth contended that the list of alleged Russian disinformation offenders even included “‘a few accounts of American and Canadian journalists (e.g. [Grayzone’s] Aaron Mate),’ and said that Twitter would focus on rule violations and inauthentic behavior (i.e., bots).”
One interaction between the FBI and Facebook was as alarming as the collusion with Twitter. The FBI worked to discredit the New York Post’s blockbuster story on Hunter Biden’s laptop. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg later reported that FBI officials had approached him with a warning that Russia was conducting a concerted disinformation campaign during the 2020 U.S. election cycle, just as the Kremlin did in 2016. It was hard to miss the government’s implication that the laptop probably was part of the latest disinformation effort, and that Facebook should take down posts or algorithmically throttle accounts contending that revelations contained in the files were genuine. Yet there was no evidence at the time or subsequently that the laptop involved Russian disinformation. The allegation further poisoned relations with Russia, though, as well as stifled debate on a crucial issue.
In an early September 2023 ruling, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the Biden administration’s meetings with social media companies had violated the First Amendment. That is an encouraging development in the battle against censorship by proxy, but it is unlikely that agencies in the national security apparatus will abandon their efforts to curb dissent, especially on controversial issues related to Washington’s role in the world. Freedom of the press clearly is under siege even in supposedly liberal, democratic countries.
Source: 2ndsmartestguyintheworld HNewsWire
Revelation: A Blueprint for the Great Tribulation
A Watchman Is Awakened
Will Putin Fulfill Biblical Prophecy and Attack Israel?
Newsletter
Orphans
Editor's Bio
A Thrilling Ride
Every once in awhile, a book comes across your path that is impossible to put down. A Long Journey Home is not a casual book that you read in a week or earmark to complete at a later date. Once you begin, cancel your schedule, put your phone on silent, find a quiet place where you cannot be disturbed, and complete the journey. Click Here to Purchase on Amazon.com!