HNewsWire: The term "theory" does not signify what you believe it does...

In Davos, the World Economic Forum, governments around the world, and the mainstream news media are raising the alarm about right-wing conspiracy theories. And it's easy to see why: conspiracy theories are, on the surface, ridiculous. The uninteresting reality is that people and institutions are awful at maintaining secrets.

Nonetheless, a startling number of outlandish right-wing conspiracy theories have recently been proven to be correct:

The World Economic Forum has a spooky power over world leaders, and it truly wants "A Great Reset," in which we all live in low-energy, high-density, low-privacy environments, have less physical riches, and, yes, eat insects for protein instead of meat.

The FBI did, in fact, spy on Donald Trump's campaign, conduct brief-and-leak operations, and spread misinformation about the extent of Russian election interference in ways that led nearly all of the media, media platforms, and Democrats to believe that Hunter Biden's laptop was a hoax and that anyone who talked about it was a conspiracy theorist, and in a way that may have constituted election interference.

At the request of the White House and Twitter, Facebook and Twitter blocked correct information and used hidden blacklists to restrict and deplatform disfavored voices and viewpoints, even though their own internal teams confirmed the people being silenced had not breached any of the platform's rules.

People who claim that the above are "conspiracy theories" claim that the World Economic Forum is just a shindig, that the FBI was simply doing what bipartisan majorities in Congress and the President agreed was necessary after Russian election interference in the 2016 elections, and that government officials and social media executives were doing the best they could with the information they had during a fast-moving pandemic involving millions of lives.

But, if the World Economic Forum is a shambles, it is also extremely powerful, particularly in its own estimation, with its founder, Klaus Schwab, playing a surprisingly huge position within the G-20 organization of world leaders.

The FBI went well beyond what Congress and the President asked and appears to have carried out a systematic operation to purposefully misinform the media and social media platforms about the Hunter Biden laptop, which it had in its possession.

While Monday morning quarterbacking on covid frequently goes too far, it's also true that Twitter and Facebook blocked qualified persons expressing a legitimate point of view about vaccines and withheld factually accurate vaccine information.

Furthermore, all of the preceding raise serious questions about the current state of Western democracy.

A rich, secretive, and unelected guy, Klaus Schwab, is exercising a very big influence over world leaders on the Left and Right, from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.

The FBI, the world's most powerful law enforcement organization, is controlled by people who have shown great comfort in abusing the warrant process, leaking to the press, and influencing journalists and social media executives in what appears to be deliberate influence operations, also known as psyops.

And everyone from Davos to the White House to the major corporate news media is using "disinformation" and "misinformation" charges, whether from Russians, 4chan, or Harvard professors, as justifications to ban social media sites.

What is the reason for this? Why did so many outlandish right-wing conspiracy ideas prove to be true? And why are the elites behaving in such an undemocratic manner?

Over the previous decade, the WEF, the White House, and intelligence agencies such as the FBI have exercised exceptional control over publicly available material. Cushy gatherings like Aspen and Davos are adept at subjugating journalists to elites.

The capacity of government organizations like the White House and FBI to abuse their power is especially powerful when they have the majority of the public's support, as was the case with Covid and Trump, whose popularity ranged between 35 and 45 percent. And the concentration of power in a small number of social media platforms, primarily Facebook and Twitter, provides a chance to coerce politicians and government officials into depriving hundreds of millions of people of accurate information and feeding them misinformation.

All of the aforementioned, however, are backward attempts to put the Internet genie back in the bottle, and hence bound to failure. Elon Musk's takeover of Twitter demonstrated the fragility of social media platform ownership. Musk not only revealed the extent to which the FBI controlled Twitter, but he also demolished the prior blue checkmark verification system, which skewed the entire system toward woke-WEF ideology, or what Martin Gurri refers to as the "one-sided politics of identity and ecology."

Change is on its way. A growing number of people see the importance of paying for news and information from reliable and independent sources, free of financial conflicts of interest, and who make their values and ideas plain, rather than hiding them...