By SRH Like AT&T in the 1980s, or Standard Oil in the 1910s, or Alcoa in the 1940s, the writing is on the wall. A new antitrust trial against Google is set to commence on Monday. Should Google be unsuccessful, it will mark their third defeat. Eventually, they may come to understand that the future of their existing business model is in jeopardy.
And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbor: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honorable. Isaiah 3:5
Even while all of this is horrendous and oppressive—which it is—it means we will have to work extremely hard to migrate to offline communication and go underground. Our time to enjoy this luxury is rapidly running out, and our words have consequences. Friends will therefore need to learn to control their tongues and exercise caution when and where they say things, both online and off.
Whoever does not open his mouth or use his tongue will not have problems in his soul.
A bird of the air will carry the voice, and that which has wings will tell the story. Therefore, do not curse the monarch, at least not in your thoughts, nor curse the wealthy, in your bedchamber.
As a result, since it is a bad moment, the wise will remain mute or be Jailed!
Ecclesiastes 10:20, Proverbs 21:23, and Amos 5:13
The Censorship Practices of FakeBook, Along With Those of Google, Instagram, Microsoft’s LinkedIn, and Twitter 1.0, Have Stripped the Public of the Opportunity to Engage in Critical Discussions.
The censorship tactics employed by platforms like FakeBook, alongside those of Google, Instagram, Microsoft’s LinkedIn, and Twitter 1.0, have deprived the public of the chance to engage in essential debates about lockdowns, mask mandates, and vaccination policies. These subjects have had a profound effect on society and have shaped history in unsettling ways. FakeBook continues to stifle content from HNW and many other significant sources. The individuals orchestrating this are not being honest.
Consider the multitude of elections that have been swayed. It’s astonishing to think about the extensive ramifications of this reality. It implies that an entire generation of elected officials in this country may not have been selected through genuine processes, especially if we regard legitimacy as an informed electorate with real choices on issues that affect their lives.
The censorship imposed by Zuckerberg, along with similar measures from Google, Instagram, Microsoft’s LinkedIn, and Twitter 1.0, has robbed the public of the chance to voice their opinions on crucial issues like lockdowns, mask mandates, and vaccination requirements. These matters have deeply unsettled society and set a concerning path for history.
Furthermore, this issue extends beyond the borders of the United States. These are global corporations, meaning that elections in various countries have also been similarly affected. This represents a worldwide suppression of dissent against extreme, harmful, and impractical policies.
When viewed through this lens, this is not just a minor error. It signifies a monumental choice that goes beyond simple managerial caution. It eclipses even the manipulation of elections. This is a clear coup that has replaced a generation of leaders who advocated for freedom with those who capitulated to authority at a pivotal moment.
