Watchman: “The FDA Did Not Report Any Signals Triggered by the “Vaccines” Produced by Moderna and Johnson & Johnson.” We Know Damn Well That the Moderna Injections Do “Trigger” Myocarditis, Especially in Young Males (But Also in Women and Victims of Other Ages), EVIL

HNewsWire: The FDA cannot be trusted! They have been bought off, and they lie constantly.
Their own monsters are entirely of their own making. They've completely lost everyone's confidence, so nobody believes them anymore. As a direct consequence of this deception, future generations will refuse to vaccinate their children.

As for my health care, I know that I, like many others I know, will never put my faith in a doctor, hospital, or government institution.
Eventually, you will be stripped of the authority that served as the only source of nourishment for your inflated sense of self-importance. The Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control, and similar organizations are all deserving of praise.

The FDA, like the CDC and the NIH before them (with regard to Covid-19), did nothing right. The only thing they did correctly was follow the CCP's design. They circled the wagons to cover up the government's ineptitude and corruption.
A recent report reveals that the FDA discovered potential problems with the most widely administered COVID-19 vaccination in early 2021, but waited months before making the finding public.

Researchers from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revealed in a recent study that they saw safety signals for two significant illnesses among the elderly after immunization with Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine on February 27, 2021. Myocardial infarction (caused by a shortage of oxygen to the heart) and pulmonary embolism (caused by a blood clot in the lungs) were the two conditions.

The alarm for disseminated intravascular coagulation, an extremely unusual kind of blood clotting, went out two weeks later. In addition, a blood platelet issue red flag was raised in April of that year.

On July 12, 2021, however, the FDA finally issued a warning on the warning signs.

The FDA made it seem like they had just recently uncovered the signals in that statement.

While conducting its "near real-time monitoring," the FDA identified "four possible AEIs," or adverse events of interest. Neither the screening procedure nor the AEIs themselves can prove that the vaccination was the cause of these four incidents, therefore they may not represent genuine safety issues. The FDA is being transparent by releasing the preliminary results of this safety research, but the agency maintains that its findings raise no alarms.

There seems to be no good explanation for the FDA's protracted delay in issuing a warning. When reached for comment, neither the FDA nor the study's corresponding author (the head of the FDA's Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance) responded.

Reactions People that advocate for safer communities have voiced their worry about the delay.

People over the age of 65 have been a primary target group for the COVID vaccine from the start, and 95% of them in the United States have rolled up their sleeves to be vaccinated as of this writing. In accordance with the law, the FDA must guarantee the security of all vaccines available to the general population. The FDA waited five months to alert the public to a possible elevated risk of blood clots that might lead to death for seniors who get the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccination, and then another ten months before submitting a research for publication. In an email to The Epoch Times, Barbara Loe Fisher, president and co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center, shared her insights.

It took almost two years to publish this critically important information in a medical journal, she continued. "How many seniors have suffered a pulmonary embolism, heart attack, or bleeding disorder after getting the Pfizer product but doctors wrote off those life-threatening adverse events as just a "coincidence" and not related to the shot?" It is past time for Congress to look into how much and how soon government health experts knew about major health concerns after COVID vaccinations.

Another vaccine safety advocate, Kim Witczak, pointed out that the FDA approved the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines quickly after obtaining clinical trial data, but it took a long time to assess the safety signals.

Witczak, who heads up Woodymatters, told The Epoch Times via email that the FDA's "rapid" efforts to find possible new and serious safety problems are misleading.

"complements existing FDA and US Government vaccine safety surveillance systems by immediately recognizing safety issues that may not have been voluntarily reported to passive surveillance systems such as the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System," the researchers from the FDA said in a recent publication.

Witczak has advocated for an independent safety evaluation of vaccinations with no goal other than monitoring safety, and has urged the FDA, which has constantly pushed the vaccines, to "respond quickly and with neutral attitude towards safety."

Here is a quick summary of the FDA's COVID-19 vaccination monitoring:
The Food and Drug Administration will announce the first safety alerts in February of 2021.Another signal is found by the FDA in March of 2021.The FDA detects another another symptom in April of 2021.

In July of 2021, the FDA will make a public announcement confirming the presence of the signals.

In May of 2022, the FDA will send the report to the journal Vaccine for publication.
By November of 2022, the FDA had revised the document, likely in response to criticisms raised by the journal.
When the report is finally released to the public after being reviewed by academic peers—in December 2022—it will have been a success.

Recent Research
Following up on the public's statement in July 2021, this new document offered the first update.

Results from safety monitoring of vaccinations among adults aged 65 and older were published by Anderson and other researchers with the FDA or the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) via analysis of data from CMS databases. Many senior citizens in the United States are covered by Medicare and Medicaid.

The researchers confirmed that signals for all four conditions were found in the initial analysis, but they said that after further investigation, three of the conditions no longer met the signal thresholds: disseminated intravascular coagulation; the platelet disorder known as immune thrombocytopenia; and myocardial infarction, or lack of oxygen to the heart.

Conversely, pulmonary embolism cases remained above the norm.

Researchers emphasized that the onset of a signal does not always indicate a causal relationship between the disease and the vaccination, and they maintained that the advantages of the vaccine still exceed its hazards.

A different opinion was expressed by Dr. Peter McCullough, chief medical adviser for the Truth for Health Foundation, who told The Epoch Times that the new paper "corroborates the concerns of doctors that the large increase in blood clots, progression of atherosclerotic heart disease, and blood disorders are independently associated with COVID-19 vaccination."

Unfortunately, Pfizer declined to comment.

The "vaccines" made by Moderna and Johnson & Johnson were not associated with any signals reported to the FDA. Myocarditis is a known "complication" of Moderna injections, particularly in young guys (but also in women and victims of other ages).