New York Times Falsely Reports Children Dying From COVID Linked Condition.

The New York Times reported on May 19 that hundreds of children perished from multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), a rare condition that occurs in certain infants after exposure to COVID-19.

“Nearly 4,000 youngsters aged 5 to 11 have perished from MIS-C,” the publication claimed in a piece by Apoorva Mandavilli.

Only 68 children have died from MIS-C during the pandemic, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The erroneous statistic was swiftly debunked.

“In this breaking news item promoted by @nytimes, an award-winning scientific journalist (whose work appears to be unchecked) says that MIS-C has killed 4000 children aged 5 to 11. “CDC only lists six,” remarked one Twitter user. “What exactly is going on?”

“I simply wanted to report this (and couldn’t DM you), so tweeting instead,” a freelance writer named David Zweig wrote, tagging Mandavilli.

The report was then revised to state that almost 4,000 children aged 5 to 11 “had been diagnosed with” MIS-C, but no number of deaths was given.

The change was a “stealth edit,” which means it was made without informing readers. The modification was not explained in any correction or editor’s note.

Mandavilli admitted what had occurred, informing criticism that the “misinformation” had been “corrected.”

“It was diagnosed, not died.” “It’s all fixed now,” she tweeted.

Mandavilli and a New York Times representative did not immediately reply to calls for comment.

Mandavilli has previously erred on a similar statistic.

She incorrectly said in an article published in October 2021 that “almost 900,000 children have been hospitalized with COVID-19 since the pandemic began, and roughly 520 have died.”

Up to that moment, around 63,000 youngsters had been admitted to hospitals.

A correction was made to the piece in that situation.

The paper “misrepresented the number of Covid hospitalizations in U.S. children,” it claimed.

“It’s over 63,000 from August 2020 to October 2021, not 900,000 since the outbreak began,” the clarification stated.

During the pandemic, Mandavilli drew attention for suggesting that the notion that SARS-CoV-2 developed in a laboratory in Wuhan, China, where the first cases of COVID-19 were discovered, had “racist underpinnings.” COVID-19 is caused by SARS-CoV-2.

“A theory might have racist roots and still attract reasonable followers along the road,” Mandavilli said in another post, adding, “Doesn’t make the roots any less racist or the theory any more compelling, though.”

We live in a day and age in which people like this individual are given the responsibility of distributing vital data and statistics to the masses. She has no business blatantly manufacturing false statistics and only changing them when people notice. This is part of the problem we’ve been dealing with since the entire “pandemic” kicked off. Data is a very difficult thing to attain, and there are many angles by which data can be viewed. With that being said, since the beginning of this pandemic media outlets have pushed this pandemic terror onto society by altering societies perspective with exaggerated data.

The internet has proved to be a place in which you can tune into various frequencies in search of a perspective that best fits your narrative. I could make up an argument on the fly and back it up with facts pertaining to my argument. With that being said, the news about COVID-19 is terrifyingly polarizing. There is a spectrum, by which all narratives of the COVID-19 agenda are carefully presented to anyone conducting research. The opposing sides of the spectrum are those who are sold on the COVID-19 pandemic, and those who aren’t sold at all.

But it becomes extremely important that we listen to our gut, when we notice that someone is eyeballing something that rightfully belongs to you. Our civil liberties are merely gods gift to man interpreted by men of power. No man, woman, government, organization, forum, or anything will prosper as a weapon against God. With that being said, when our God given rights are at stake, it is probably best to question the integrity of those who propose the removal of such rights. In summary, if you’re not a “conspiracy theorist” you probably aren’t asking very many questions about the world around you.

My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.

Hosea 4:6

On May 16, a group of teachers and parents protested outside the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) offices in Los Angeles when some unvaccinated online class teachers heard that unless they become completely vaccinated against COVID-19 by June 10, they might lose their jobs.

At the demonstration organized by Los Angeles Educators and Parents United—a group of “diverse LAUSD Educators & Parents united for freedom of choice,” according to its Instagram page—dozens of individuals held signs reading “Stop Discrimination,” “Medical Freedom,” and “LAUSD Stop Firing Teachers.”

According to the group, the district has shifted over 600 unvaccinated instructors from brick-and-mortar classrooms to City of Angels, the district’s online school, since the rule began in November.

An email issued by the district last week to an unknown number of unvaccinated online teachers sparked the outrage.

Due to low enrolment in the district’s online academies, the email told the recipients that they would not be permitted to teach remotely next school year.

According to the memo, those educators have three options: get vaccinated and return to campus, take a leave of absence, quit, or retire by the end of June.

Remaining teachers must obtain the first dose of vaccination by May 20 and the second dose by June 10. Those who are leaving their jobs, either temporarily or permanently, must tell the district by May 20. Failure to comply with any of these requirements might result in “possible separation” from the district.

A LAUSD representative refused to say how many instructors received the email or how the district chose which teachers to send it to.

However, when more students chose to return to campus in the autumn, the amount of accessible online teaching assignments declined, according to the spokesman.

The spokeswoman informed The Epoch Times in an email that “reasonable accommodation permission for placement into the virtual school has always been subject on availability and not a promised assignment.”

When she got the email, Francis Moreno, a LAUSD teacher and co-founder of Los Angeles Educators and Parents United, said she felt “angry and abandoned.”

“We teachers have given the district decades of our life, and now we feel like the forgotten stepchild,” she added.

The email, according to Moreno, arrived just weeks after her religious vaccination exemption was authorized. She claims that the majority of the distant instructors have already secured religious or medical exemptions from the district.

“The district is treating teachers unfairly because of our religious views,” Moreno said. “We went to our union for help, but they don’t seem to be advocating for us either.” “No one is on our side.”

Moreno claimed she just conducted a poll among her friends. The district allowed religious exemptions for 90% of the 164 participants, and 67 percent got the email.

She also mentioned that 88 percent of the attendees are members of the local teachers’ union, United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA).

The Los Angeles Educators and Parents United have spent the last few months attempting to meet with both LAUSD Superintendent Alberto Carvalho and the vice president of UTLA, but have been ignored by both.

“UTLA purports to be a democratic union, but it is more concerned with problems of social justice than with being a labor organization and serving its members,” she added.

After the superintendent revealed a plan to fill 400 vacant teaching jobs with administrators and other district personnel, Moreno and other educators and parents organized a demonstration last month to petition the administration to bring unvaccinated instructors back to in-person education.

On April 27, Carvalho reported that 98 percent of teaching vacancies had been temporarily replaced by certified non-teaching personnel who had previously had teaching roles, and that those staff members would return to their normal posts after the current school year ended. It is presently unknown how the district intends to permanently replace the openings next school year.

California Educators for Medical Freedom, another educator advocacy organization, is suing the district over its staff vaccination demand. In March 2023, the case will be heard.

While countless cities in various countries including the U.S repeal their tyrannical COVID-19 legislature, Los Angeles seemingly won’t back down from their idiotic political purge of essential workers. These tyrannical governments are doing nothing but flexing their muscles, and showing what kind of power they hold over society. Which just goes to show the lack of intellect these globalists carry; Because now we know exactly what kind of power they shouldn’t have. Nobody asked these democrats to jump in the spotlight and start making a fool of themselves and our country.

No one man can make sense of this elaborate illusion cast over the common man of society, but collectively we can point out each limitation forced upon us and bring it forward as an injustice to the public. In Matthew 10:34 Jesus says: “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.” We’re meant to go down preaching the gospel and guiding others to salvation. This could be considered the bravest task a man or woman of faith could undertake, but make no mistake it will bear fruit in the kingdom of heaven. Stay inquisitive in the word of God, and the world around you.