They Are Playing For Keeps.

Satan Soldiers At Google Said in Court Documents: Free Speech Is “Disastrous” for Society,

The issue with approving and accepting any New World Order is that no government has ever provided genuine hope or peace for humanity, and none will ever provide it. A guy becomes disillusioned and enslaved by the government as he looks to it for global peace and hope as it makes false promises. Due to the inherent weaknesses of power struggles, greed, and corruption, no quasi-world empire has ever managed to endure, as history has repeatedly demonstrated.

A harsh awakening awaits those who hope for the establishment of a New World Order, regardless of their religious or secular beliefs. The reality is that, despite human intelligence and creativity, misguided religious teachings are unable to create utopia. Perpetual tranquility and joy are only found in heaven. The Bible makes it very evident that everything related to our earthly existence, including its pains, deterioration, unhappiness, and death, will endure beyond this mortal existence (2 Corinthians 4:16; Hebrews 9:27).

Furthermore, it is evident that the heavenly city is utterly unaware of all of these things (Revelation 21:3–7 and Revelation 22). They’re going to be eliminated. Indeed, we do need hope. However, we require the hope of heaven rather than the delusionary hope of a New World Order. According to John 14:1–4, heaven is the only place where believers can find hope. It is not here on this earth.

One of the most important aspects of a free society is freedom of expression. But when a free society is deteriorating, it frequently goes first. Certain types of offensive speech are classified as “hate” speech, while communication that challenges the status quo is thought to have terroristic potential. Although it’s a very steep slope, this is how fascism infiltrates and overthrows governments. Thanks to the First Amendment’s protection of free expression, the United States is fortunate to have some degree of free speech left. However, some aspects of this priceless freedom are being undermined, such as the ability to discuss particular subjects without facing severe criticism or mockery.

Approximately 50% of the global populace uses Google annually. According to Internet Live Stats, Google handles approximately 40,000 search inquiries every second. Users of the internet see more than 76,000 videos on YouTube, a Google-designed streaming site, in the same second.

Currently, there are more than two billion Android smartphones in use worldwide. Google created the Android mobile operating system. Google tracks users and gathers user data through various services.

It is now a fact that Google controls a monopoly on the flow of information. Google is in charge of how information is distributed and manipulated globally. Information can be either promoted or suppressed by Google algorithms.

This makes Google Inc. vulnerable to ideological and political restrictions, which have an impact on the billions of customers that use Google services every year. Google uses this authority to meddle in elections, business, and people’s daily lives.

Leaked Google memo: Free speech must be abandoned in the spirit of the “American tradition.”

Some businesses and political goals that will do anything to stifle oppositional viewpoints and influence public opinion have an impact on Google.

Because Google is not an unbiased platform, search results are designed to emphasize the opinions that Google executives and their cult of personality find most important.

Encouraged by their special interests, powerful and wealthy individuals essentially lobby Google to further their objectives while stifling online competition and opposition. Certain views gain popularity because of Google, while others are marginalized, devalued, and ridiculed.

Google is facing criticism for blocking the right-wing website PragerU. PragerU has sued Google, but very few organizations have the legal clout to retaliate against the company. The real goal of Google is being revealed.

Google claims that there would be “disastrous practical consequences” from government regulation in a statement it submitted to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Google explicitly states in their statement that they do not wish to be subject to First Amendment restrictions.

Google is unwilling to adapt to its users’ needs or provide an equal forum for free speech. Because upholding the First Amendment throughout its services “would undermine important content regulation,” the anti-American giant refuses to do so.

“YouTube and other service providers would lose much of their ability to protect their users against offensive or objectionable content—including pornography, hate speech, personal attacks, and terrorist propaganda—if they were bound by the same First Amendment rules that apply to the government,” said Google.

The United States should appoint a fair judicial panel to look into censorship cases.

Google should continue to be in charge of its own content regulations, but when concerns about political, commercial, or ideological restrictions are raised, the US should designate an independent committee to examine Google’s conduct.

Given Google’s extensive control over information and the growing number of censorship accusations against the company, it is critical that a judicial review committee hold Google responsible when it infringes on people’s online freedom of speech.

Google maintains that their corporation is entitled to discriminate based on political opinions since they “cannot be forced to change,” as stated in their legal statement.

What Google fails to see is that their monopoly can be made to operate more equitably through the right legal scrutiny without resorting to anti-competitive behavior that serves their own interests and the objectives of their powerful allies.

Individuals and groups subjected to Google’s censorship have a right to present their case and be heard. Google may face legal action for violating people’s First Amendment rights and for failing to update its algorithms when it exploits search engine users, advertisers, and content providers unfairly. The rule of law ought to be respected.

Watchman: anticipate all of these potential “events” that Google is alerting you to and be fully aware of what might be on the horizon.

In an election year that appears unwinnable this time around—or at the very least, that story makes for riveting political Kabuki theater—the democratic globalist maniacs would stand to gain little by igniting a variety of PSYOPS, such as a third global health crisis, shutting down the internet, taking down the electricity grid, triggering the next market crash, or even initiating World War III.

SRH: Ceasing to use Google’s goods and services is the only way to deny its power.