Michelle Obama Says White People Are “Still Running” from Blacks & Immigrants

megaphone-2

Advisory: Be careful of what you read on social media. The algorithms used by these platforms have no regard for Biblical truth. They target your emotions to keep you engaged on their site so their advertisers can drop more ads. These platforms exist to enrich their stockholders. Consider God’s promise to Believers in James 1:5, “If any of you lacks wisdom, you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to you.”

Featured Story

Ms. Obama is a modern-day version of Jesse Jackson. I hate white people, Al Sharpton and the KKK hatemonger David Duke all rolled into one package of “hate” Says Black People Are “Better” Than Whites, StevieRay Hansen says People Without God in Their Hearts Are Treacherous……

Michelle Obama claims that white people are “still running” from black people and immigrants by moving out of diverse neighborhoods.

Obama made the comments during her appearance at the annual Obama Foundation summit.

“I wanna remind white folks, ya’ll be running from us…this family with all the values you read about, you were running from us,” said Obama in reference to white people moving out of the south side of Chicago where she grew up as black people moved in.

“And you’re still running – because we’re no different than the immigrant families that are moving in,” she added.

Obama then went on to make a bizarre supremacist-style comment suggesting that black people were “better” than white people.

“We are just as and often times better than many of the people who doubt us,” she said.

The former First Lady’s comments are somewhat hypocritical given that the Obamas don’t appear to enjoy living around black people themselves.

In 2017, they purchased their DC home for $8.1 million. It is located in Kalorama, an exclusive and wealthy enclave where 83% of the population is white and just 3.8% are African-American. Source Summit News

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

Here’s the honest man Ms. Obama is talking about, she is delusional…

**Documents Confirm that Obama IRS Improperly Targeted Conservatives** We continue to undercover the details of the Obama IRS’ arbitrary and capricious behavior toward those presumed to be “enemies” of President Obama.   This week we released [**695 pages**](http://links.mail2.spopessentials2.com/ctt?kn=39&ms=MTA3ODIxMDMS1&r=MTkyNzA1MDAzNzc2S0&b=0&j=MTE0MDU3MTM2OAS2&mt=1&rt=0) of new documents containing admissions by IRS officials that the agency used “inappropriate political labels” to screen the tax-exempt applications of conservative organizations. Other records reveal that the IRS was going to require 501(c)(4) nonprofit organizations to restrict their alleged political activities if they opted for “expedited consideration” of their tax-exempt applications.   The documents were produced after a [**revelation**](http://links.mail2.spopessentials2.com/ctt?kn=13&ms=MTA3ODIxMDMS1&r=MTkyNzA1MDAzNzc2S0&b=0&j=MTE0MDU3MTM2OAS2&mt=1&rt=0) by the IRS that it had located “an additional 6,924 documents of potentially responsive records” relating to a 2015 Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) [**lawsuit**](http://links.mail2.spopessentials2.com/ctt?kn=40&ms=MTA3ODIxMDMS1&r=MTkyNzA1MDAzNzc2S0&b=0&j=MTE0MDU3MTM2OAS2&mt=1&rt=0) about the Obama IRS targeting scandal.  

These new records are the first batch of nearly 7,000 documents that had been hidden from JW, Congress, and the American people.  (Our FOIA lawsuit seeks records about the IRS’ selection of individuals and organizations for audits based upon applications requesting nonprofit tax status filed by Tea Party and other 501(c)(4) tax-exempt organizations ([***Judicial Watch v. Internal Revenue Service***](http://links.mail2.spopessentials2.com/ctt?kn=15&ms=MTA3ODIxMDMS1&r=MTkyNzA1MDAzNzc2S0&b=0&j=MTE0MDU3MTM2OAS2&mt=1&rt=0) (No. 1:15-cv-00220)).   Of the 695 pages of documents released by the IRS, 422 (61%) were completely blacked out. Again, this new material was not in the [**“Congressional Database,”**](http://links.mail2.spopessentials2.com/ctt?kn=36&ms=MTA3ODIxMDMS1&r=MTkyNzA1MDAzNzc2S0&b=0&j=MTE0MDU3MTM2OAS2&mt=1&rt=0) which the IRS created in 2013 to house records responsive to congressional inquiries into the IRS scandal.   Nevertheless, we extracted some key info – such as a June 20, 2013, [**memo**](http://links.mail2.spopessentials2.com/ctt?kn=27&ms=MTA3ODIxMDMS1&r=MTkyNzA1MDAzNzc2S0&b=0&j=MTE0MDU3MTM2OAS2&mt=1&rt=0) from Karen Schiller, then-acting director, EO (Exempt Organizations) Rulings and Agreements, suspending use of the controversial Be on the Lookout (BOLO) and Touch and Go (TAG) lists:EO Rulings and Agreements is undertaking a comprehensive review of screening and identification of critical issues.

We intend to develop proper procedures and uses for these types of documents. Until a more formal process for identification, approval, and distribution of this type of data is established, Rulings and Agreements will not use this technique to elevate issues. In an August 9, 2013, memo, Schiller admitted the IRS used political labels in targeting the groups for special scrutiny and possible audit and that, going forward, the agency would screen organizations based only on their activities, “not words” or “labels of any kind:” As Acting Commissioner Danny Werfel has said, the IRS has taken decisive action to eliminate the use of inappropriate political labels in the screening of 501(c)(4) applications. IRS policy is now clear that screening is based on activity, not words in a name. The new steps and current policies were outlined in the June 24 report, which noted: “In the absence of BOLO lists, the Determinations Unit will continue to screen for information affecting the determination of applications for tax-exempt status, including activity tied to political campaign intervention, but it [will] be done without regard to specific labels of any kind.” The 30-day report also reflects the June 20, 2013 memorandum, which was issued to officially suspend the use of the BOLO list in the screening process. The documents also include a “Dear [Applicant]” letter that offers an “expedited process” for 501(c)(4) groups in exchange for restriction on their activities:This optional expedited process is currently available only to applicants for 501(c)(4) status with applications pending for more than 120 days as of May 28, 2013, that indicate the organization may be involved in political campaign intervention.  

In this optional process, an organization will represent that it satisfies, and will continue to satisfy, set percentages with respect to the level of its social welfare activities and political campaign intervention activities (as defined in the specific instructions on pages 5-7). These percentage representations are not an interpretation of the law but are a safe harbor for those organizations that choose to participate in the optional process. In short, the Obama IRS, after lawlessly delaying the approval of Tea Party group applications, tried to extort restrictions – which had no basis in law – on these very same groups.   On September 30, 2013, Acting Director, Exempt Organizations, Kenneth C. Corbin, sent a memo to IRS staff providing detailed guidance on classifying applications when “‘merit approval’ is not an option,” emphasizing that the determination is to be based on “facts and circumstances,” not “words and labels:” Classifier reviews the application and determines if it should be routed to a specialty group. This determination is based upon facts and circumstances of the stated activities within Part II of the application rather than names or labels. This is consistent with Karen Schiller’s August 9, 2013 memorandum …The Schiller and Corbin memos came on the heels of May 14, 2013, Inspector General report revealing that the IRS had singled out groups using conservative-sounding terms such as “patriot” and “Tea Party” when applying for tax-exempt status. The IG probe determined that “Early in Calendar Year 2010, the IRS began using inappropriate criteria to identify organizations applying for tax-exempt status (e.g., lists of past and future donors)” and “delayed processing of targeted groups’ applications” in advance of the 2012 presidential election.   No wonder the Obama IRS hid these records. These new smoking-gun documents contain admissions by the Obama IRS that it inappropriately targeted conservative groups. But the records also show that the abuse continued – as the Obama IRS tried to force conservative applicants to give up their First Amendment rights in order to finally get their applications granted. JW Exposes Dangerous Criminals Protected by Texas Sanctuary City Policy ** Sanctuary city policies that undermine and thwart immigration law put politics above public safety.   As evidence of this, please take a look at 204 illegal alien Detainer Requests denied to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) by the Travis County, Texas, Sheriff’s Office. The illegal aliens protected by the Sheriff’s Office were charged or convicted of 34 acts of violence, and 14 thefts or burglaries. Forty-four of the denied requests were for inmates originally detained by Homeland Security and temporarily transferred to Travis County (home to the state capital in Austin) for disposition of state or local charges.  

The sanctuary policy, the “Travis County Sheriff’s Office Policy on Cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement,” limits the extent to which the sheriff’s office will cooperate with ICE.   On February 2, 2017, the Austin American-Statesman reported that the Travis County Sheriff’s Office had “declined 196 detention requests” from ICE. Once the ICE detainers were removed, 37 people were released on bail. These inmates may have been able to post bail prior to the new sanctuary policy, “but they would have been released into ICE custody for possible deportation.”   On February 3 we submitted a Public Information Act Request to the sheriff’s office asking for The 196 detention requests from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Such requests may include Department of Homeland Security Forms I-247N, I-247D or I-247-X; and Any records provided to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement by the Travis County’s Sheriff’s office that declines the 196 detention requests. We got back forms ( “Immigration Detainer—Request for Voluntary Action”) that show the illegal aliens protected by this sanctuary policy had the following criminal records:58 DWIs;34 acts of violence (assault, aggregated assault, assault with a deadly weapon, etc.);14 thefts/burglaries or other crimes against property;8 drug-possession charges; 6 firearms violations;45 other assorted felonies and misdemeanors (including contempt and failure to appear in court), and35 unlisted or unclassified charges. [NOTE: Totals do not add due to multiple charges/convictions in some instances.]These documents provide disturbing evidence of how Travis County’s sanctuary policy protects criminal illegal aliens, many of whom are dangerous felons, from deportation. Again, sanctuary policies such as these put the public’s safety at risk.  

Under the new sanctuary policy, the sheriff’s office now honors only select detention requests for inmates charged or convicted of a crime on a narrowly specified list of such crimes as murder and aggravated sexual assault. For all other crimes, ICE must present the sheriff with a warrant or judicial order before the inmate will be detained:(a) when the detainer request is accompanied by a judicial warrant or court order for continued detention or notification to the extent required by the judicial warrant or court order; or (b) when the individual who is the subject of the ICE detainer request is charged with or has been convicted of the following felonies under Texas law: (1) Capita Murder … (2) Murder – First Degree … (3) Aggravated Sexual Assault … (4) Continuous Smuggling of Persons … A conviction consists of the final entry of adjudication of guilt by a court pursuant to the statue and after exhaustion of the appellate process. If a court later (a) vacates the judicial warrant or court order, or (b) the individual’s conviction and/or sentence is overturned, TCSO will decline the ICE detainer request relating to that individual. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott intends to support federal actions against sanctuary policies by signing legislation that could put sheriffs of sanctuary cities in jail. The governor announced $1.5 million in cuts for the county in response to Travis County Sheriff Hernandez’s policy.   So in the face of all the sanctuaries, there is some sanity.  In the meantime, we are investigating other sanctuary cities’ coddling of illegal alien criminals.  And we are directly challenging in court San Francisco’s sanctuary policy.    Stay tuned. **Climategate Obstruction Challenged in Court ** Here in DC today it is terribly cold for early April.  The problem for the “climate change” crowd is that a plethora of cold days such as this has added to one long pause in global warming.  In other words, there hasn’t been any “global warming” for years.  

This inconvenient truth is at the heart of new Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation against the U.S. Department of Commerce to get all records of communications between a pair of federal scientists who heavily influenced the Obama administration’s climate change policy and its backing of the Obama-pushed global warming alarmist agenda under the so-called Paris Agreement (Judicial Watch v. Department of Commerce (No. 1:17-cv-00541)).   We filed the lawsuit after the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), a component of the Department of Commerce, failed to respond to our February 6 FOIA request seeking: All records of communications between NOAA scientist Thomas Karl and Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy John Holdren. The FOIA request covers the timeframe of January 20, 2009, to January 20, 2017. Karl, who until last year was the director of the NOAA section that produces climate data, the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), was the lead author of a landmark paper that was reported to have heavily influenced the Paris Agreement.   Holdren is a former director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, director of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, and a long-time proponent of strong measures to curb emissions.   According to The Daily Mail, a whistleblower accused Thomas Karl of bypassing normal procedures to produce a scientific paper promoting climate alarmism:A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.   The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. …   But the whistleblower, Dr. John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

  It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr. Bates devised.   His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.In an exclusive interview, Dr. Bates accused the lead author of the paper, Thomas Karl, who was until last year director of the NOAA section that produces climate data – the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) – of ‘insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximized warming and minimized documentation … in an effort to discredit the notion of a global warming pause, rushed so that he could time publication to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy’.This lawsuit could result in the release of emails that will help Americans understand how Obama administration officials may have mishandled scientific data to advance the political agenda of global warming alarmism.   Separately, we are suing for records of communications from NOAA officials regarding the methodology for collecting and interpreting data used in climate models to justify the controversial findings in the “Pausebuster” study. The data documents had also been withheld from Congress. (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Commerce (No 1:15-cv-02088)).  

We previously investigated alleged data manipulation by global warming advocates in the Obama administration. In 2010we obtained internal documents from NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) related to a controversy that erupted in 2007 when Canadian blogger Stephen McIntyre exposed an error in NASA’s handling of raw temperature data from 2000-2006 that exaggerated the reported rise in temperature readings in the United States. According to multiple press reports, when NASA corrected the error, the new data apparently caused a reshuffling of NASA’s rankings for the hottest years on record in the United States, with 1934 replacing 1998 at the top of the list.   Forget about “fake news,” with the leftists that have been running our government for years – we have to worry about the potential of taxpayer-funded “fake science.”   U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz Addresses Government Oversight Challenges at JW If you have not had a chance to watch our special presentation on “Government Oversight Challenges,” let me encourage you to do so. U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz, chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, was our guest in our DC headquarters for this presentation. He begins with an explanation of why Judicial Watch can often uncover secrets hidden by the government agencies that the Congress can’t get to.  You can watch it here. Until next week, Tom Fitton President **View on our Website Here
HNewsWire Logo top Menu

Former first lady Michelle Obama condemned white people for fleeing minority neighborhoods just weeks after she and her husband purchased a $15 million estate in Martha’s Vineyard.

Martha’s Vineyard is 95 percent white and just two percent black.

Martha’s Vineyard is almost as white as an Elizabeth Warren rally.

Martha’s Vineyard is whiter than my subdivision here in rural North Carolina.

Martha’s Vineyard is whiter than MSNBC.

During a Tuesday appearance at the Obama Foundation Summit in Chicago, she said, “But unbeknownst to us, we grew up in the period — as I write — called ‘white flight.’ That as families like ours, upstanding families like ours … As we moved in, white folks moved out because they were afraid of what our families represented.”

“And I always stop there when I talk about this out in the world because, you know, I want to remind white folks that y’all were running from us.” She went on, “This family with all the values that you’ve read about. You were running from us. And you’re still running, because we’re no different than the immigrant families that are moving in … the families that are coming from other places to try to do better.”

Did I mention that Michelle and Barry just purchased a $15 million estate in Martha’s Vineyard, which is 95 percent white?

Oh, and did I mention the Obamas own a second home, an $8 million mansion, in the exclusive DC neighborhood of Kalorama, which is 80 percent white and just four percent black.

Former United States first lady Michelle Obama greets the audience during the AIA Conference on Architecture 2017 on April 27, 2017 in Orlando, Florida. Michelle Obama is making one of her first public speeches at the Orlando Conference since leaving the White House. (Photo by Gerardo Mora/Getty Images)

Oh, and did I mention the Obamas have a third home, a $5.3 million mansion, in Rancho Mirage, California, which is 89 percent white and just 2.6 percent black.

Oh, sure, the Obamas still own their Chicago home in Hyde Park, which is at least 26 percent black. But you would think they could do better than 26 percent!

I like Michelle Obama. I have always liked Michelle Obama. I’ve never said an unkind word about her, quite the opposite, and while I find her politics ignorant, she was a terrific first lady.

But this is nuts…

Not only is she attacking white people for seeking a better standard of living, which I can assure you (as I will explain below) has little to do with racism, she is also attacking whites after she herself “fled” to 95 percent white Martha’s Vineyard (I will never stop repeating this point) and two other homes in areas where the black population is less than 5 percent.

Worse still, she is putting white people in a position where they can never win, where they are damned if they do or don’t, where they are always and forever racist.

If white people move out of a black neighborhood, they’re racists engaging in white flight.

But…

And this is important…

If white people move into a minority neighborhood, they are also racists for either engaging in gentrification — which is just another form of cultural genocide, doncha know — or cultural appropriation.

Now I’m going to tell you a little something about white flight, from my own experience…

Because I was poor, back in the mid-eighties, I lived in the inner-city of Milwaukee for two years. My wife and I did not flee (my wife is not white, by the way) because of “icky minorities” (did I mention my wife is not white?), we fled because it was not safe to live there. It was never safe. Over those two years, we had been mugged, robbed, and had our car stolen. That’s why we left.

And when we fled, it was to a community that was still not as white as *ahem* Martha’s Vineyard.

In 2002, my wife and I moved to California for nine years and lived in an East Los Angeles neighborhood that was just four percent white. For nearly a decade, I was outnumbered 96-4 and never gave it a thought because I was not outnumbered. A darker skin tone, an accent, and different religious traditions did not make my neighbors any less American than me, and when I am among Americans I am among my own. We left because predominantly white leftists are destroying California.

Then there’s my poor dad…

He moved to the Northside of Milwaukee in 1980, and spent decades, a lot of money, and a ton of sweat, remodeling his home, building a garage, and paying that home off. He intended to retire there. And yes, there were black people in his neighborhood when he moved in, and for most of his adult life he worked in predominantly black institutions. He never intended to move, and held on for as long as he could… He didn’t flee because of black people. He was not forced to start all over at age 67 because he suddenly decided he didn’t like blacks. He left because he was robbed, because gangs started tagging his house and garage, because it was no longer safe to live there.

You know…

If we’re going to shame people for such things, what does it say to black people when other black people, especially the first black president and his family, reject them? What the hell kind of message is this to send to black Americans, especially when the Obamas can afford the security to live safely in any neighborhood they choose?

And if the Obamas wanted to live in Southern California, why choose Rancho Mirage over Ladera Heights, the Black Beverly Hills, a predominantly black neighborhood as swank as any in America?

Shame on Michelle and Barack Obama. They have the money and profile to make an important statement on this issue, but they obviously prefer to live in overwhelmingly white neighborhoods. Source

HNewsWire Logo top Menu
HNewsWire Logo top Menu

StevieRay Hansen
Editor, HNewsWire.com

The Birth Pains Are Growing Stronger….

“Unless God has raised you up for this very thing, you will be worn out by the opposition of man and devils”…
My name is Steve Meyers and I need to share a vision and warning that the Lord showed me back in April 2007….

Many of you will ask why I waited so long to share the warning. I didn’t. I shared the story with everyone that would listen from pastors to friends to family to colleagues. Immediately following the initial vision, I called a close friend. I told him to sit down that I had something to tell him. I needed it documented as I knew this was supernatural and from God. As I witness events unfolding today, I need to share the vision again.

The risk of loss in trading futures and options on futures can be substantial. The author does not guarantee the accuracy of the above information, although it is believed that the sources are reliable and the information accurate. The author assumes no liability or responsibility for direct or indirect, special, consequential or incidental damages or for any other damages relating or arising out of any action taken as a result of any information or advice contained in this commentary. The author disclaims any express or implied liability or responsibility for any action taken, which is solely at the liability and responsibility of the user.

The silencing of the American people before 2020?

The Un-Godly — Those That Suppress the Truth, the social media giants built multi-billion dollar empires by giving everyone a voice, but now that they have such a dominant position on the Internet they have decided that many prominent conservative voices should be completely silenced.

How to Support HNewsWire

Tagged Under: hnewswire StevieRay Hansen, HNewsWire, antichrist,digital gulag, antichrists, Apple, Bible, Big Tech, bigotry, Christian baker, Christianity, Christians, Colorado, Colorado Civil Rights Commission, conservatives, deep state, demonic assault, end of days, end times, Facebook, First Amendment, free speech, Google, hate groups, Hate speech

127-Faith-Foundation-Logo-7

The 127 Faith Foundation: We do not solicit donations from “those on disability, on a fixed income, or those who cannot afford to give.” Please Pray!

Amazon “Wish List” for The 127 Faith Foundation

Or, make checks payable to:

The 127 Faith Foundation
PO Box 127
Pontotoc, TX 76869

watchman-on-wall

Tagged In

Support

The number of Orphans aging out of Child Protective Custody has grown at an alarming rate. The 127 Faith Foundation receives many requests each week to house them at our ranch. Our prayer is that the good people of our country will step up to the challenge and offer financial support for "the least among us." We need your help! StevieRay Hansen, Founder, The 127 Faith Foundation

Newsletter

Must Read

Long-Journey-Home-1
One-Thing
Mark-Cahill-Ministries-1
One-Blinding-Vision

Other Sources

USSANews

Delicous

Web-Ad-1

Latest News

The Bill Gates Plandemic Is on Target to Destroy the Working Class: Prepare for a Tidal Wave of Evictions, Tribulation Kicks Into High Gear, Black Horse In Play

By StevieRay Hansen | July 3, 2022

HNewsWire: Plandemic America has been ruined by Bill Gates, Obama, Joe Biden, and the Satan Soldiers. Evictions might come in waves. There are almost eight…

Read More

The Ungodly NWO Planners Are Insisting No Oil No God and No Guns “Hell on Earth”

By StevieRay Hansen | July 3, 2022

(T)he actual new world order is the long-running scheme on the part of a small clique of ultra-wealthy families, loosely grouped around the British monarchy…

Read More

Update: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Has NOT Got The Memo Yet, “Pestilences” Has No Cure — Three Times God told Jeremiah, “Do Not Pray For This Evil”. Told Jeremiah, “Do Not Pray For This Evil People”

By StevieRay Hansen | July 3, 2022

and do not lift up cry or prayer for them, and do not intercede with Me; for I do not hear you” (Jer. 7:16; cf.…

Read More

Where Have All the Watchmen Gone? Where in Society Are Christ-Filled Churchgoers Fighting Demons? The Watchmen Who Would Boldly Confront Sin, Those Men Who Would Fight Evil Men Who Would Destroy Families?

By StevieRay Hansen | July 3, 2022

The Death Angel Will Be Relentless With Renegade Politicians and Ungodly Individuals – Welcome To The New Norm – DEATH – Pestilence Via Vaccines Short…

Read More

Satan Soldiers and The New World Order

By StevieRay Hansen | July 3, 2022

A Frightening And Dystopian Future… The Fourth Industrial Revolution, finally, will change not only what we do but also who we are. It will affect our…

Read More
Focused-Protection-1
Place Your Ad Here

We make every effort to acknowledge sources used in our news articles. In a few cases, the sources were lost due to a technological glitch. If you believe we have not given sufficient credit for your source material, please contact us, and we will be more than happy to link to your article.

StevieRay Hansen

In his riveting memoir, "A Long Journey Home", StevieRay Hansen will lead you through his incredible journey from homeless kid to multimillionaire oilman willing to give a helping hand to other throwaway kids. Available on Amazon.

2 Comments

  1. Carol Gibson on November 3, 2019 at 12:25 am

    she’s a racist and a liar. My grandparents migrated here willing to work. They both got jobs in factories and had a good middle class life. That gorilla faced idiot does know what she’s talking about

  2. Tracy on November 2, 2019 at 4:52 am

    Just like everyone else in High Places. She’s given a Script

Leave a Comment