“Flawed Modeling” Is The Term Used To Discredit Study That Claimed Unvaccinated Are A Danger To The Public.

A group of experts from various fields, including medical statisticians and a medical anthropologist, have rebutted a recent article published in a Canadian medical journal defending the use of COVID-19 vaccine mandates by claiming that a mathematical model shows that unvaccinated people increase the risk of infection among the vaccinated.

“It is particularly troubling that a modelling paper so divorced from reality contains such explicit and strong condemnation of ‘the unvaccinated,'” James Doidge, a senior medical statistician from the UK’s Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, and his co-authors wrote in a reply published on the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ) website on April 28.

“This approach has the potential to generate societal division, misguided anger, and blame, which is incompatible with public health principles.”

The experts were replying to a paper published in the CMAJ on April 25 by a group of Canadian scientists titled “Impact of population mixing between vaccinated and unvaccinated subpopulations on infectious disease dynamics: implications for SARS-CoV-2 transmission.”

According to the study, vaccinated persons who mix with unvaccinated people have a considerably higher probability of becoming infected than those who remain with those who have had the vaccine.

According to the mathematical model employed in the study, unvaccinated people’s chance of catching COVID-19 decreases when they spend time with vaccinated people because they operate as a transmission buffer.

The study found that being vaccinated should not be considered a purely personal decision, but rather something that should be done collectively for the benefit of public health.

“The decision of certain individuals to refuse vaccines is likely to have a disproportionate impact on the health and safety of vaccinated persons compared to the proportion of the population who are unvaccinated,” the paper stated.

The study’s result did not sit well with Doidge and his crew. In a tweet on May 1, he said that the study’s methodology is “based on an assumption that even the authors don’t believe.”

The experts concluded that the essay “oversimplified a complicated epidemiological, sociological, and bioethical issue.”

“The authors’ model design decisions predetermine the conclusions, which is something that should never happen in research.” “The poor design is made much more problematic by the authors’ strong ethical and political assertions, which fuel existing societal antagonism,” they stated.

The concept divides people into three groups: those who are susceptible to infection, those who are sick and infectious, and those who have recovered from illness and have immunity. Immunity after vaccination was viewed as a “all-or-none phenomena” by the study’s authors, which implies that persons who had the injections are presumed to enter the model immune, while those who didn’t would remain susceptible to infection.

The model does not account for diminishing immunity.

“By ignoring waning immunity (from both vaccination and prior infection), the authors have constructed a model in which herd immunity always occurs, leaving some residual proportion of the population uninfected indefinitely,” Doidge and his colleagues wrote, questioning how the mathematical model’s outcome would be influenced by the omission of scientific facts.

The article also claims that “nonvaccination is predicted to result in amplification of disease transmission in unvaccinated subpopulations” and “increases the risk of vaccinated populations,” a hypothesis that the experts refuted.

“It is a foregone conclusion that if one group with high baseline immunity is combined with another group with lower baseline immunity, a higher proportion of the high-immunity group will get sick before herd immunity is reached,” the authors said. “It’s just dilution at this point.”

If the immunity of the unvaccinated is put to a greater number in the calculation, the model will generate a “flawed” conclusion, according to the scientists.

“There are two critical factors in the model: vaccination effectiveness and baseline immunity in the unvaccinated.” The findings are reversed if these are adjusted to any combination where the latter is higher; the vaccinated increase danger for the unvaccinated. “Clearly, both findings are wrong in the same way,” they stated.

The study, according to Dr. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at the University of Guelph, is “thinly veiled hate speech disguised as science,” with “huge inaccuracies.”

“By any stretch of the imagination, most of the individuals who remain ‘unvaccinated’ are hardly ‘anti-vaccine,'” Bridle said in his Substack newsletter on April 26.

“They are not in favor of the present generation of COVID-19 vaccines due to critical thinking and scientific evidence.” Remember that the definition of a vaccination was altered to include these injections. They’re nothing like the vaccinations that have been required in the past, such as those used in the childhood immunization series.”

According to Bridle, the article wrongly assumes that COVID-19 vaccinations confer complete viral immunity and that booster doses restore protection against the Omicron version.

“Yet the’real world’ data clearly show that the boosted sub-population is being diagnosed with disproportionately more cases than the ‘not fully vaccinated’ group, which includes the ‘unvaccinated’ and people who received a single dose,” he said, citing data from the Ontario Ministry of Health’s website on April 26 on the number of COVID-19 cases by vaccination status.

“Why would someone want to take a booster and increase their chances of being diagnosed with COVID-19 by more than twofold?!?”

Bridle also pointed out that the article failed to mention the vaccines’ safety concerns, and that it assumed only 20% of unvaccinated people had baseline immunity, despite the fact that another peer-reviewed paper “estimate[d] that between 90% and 99 percent of adults show positive antibody reactivity for SARS-CoV-2 spike, RBD, or the N antigen.”

The authors, according to Doidge and his colleagues, not only failed to account for the “vast difference” in healthcare demand between an 18-year-old and a comorbid 80-year-old in their modeling, but also failed to acknowledge that their calls for vaccine mandates “helped to ignite nation-wide protest.”

“A publication published in Canada’s leading medical journal should be retracted because of a mix of severely poor modeling, moral condemnation, and politicization,” they said.

The professionals conducting these studies have a thorough understanding of the importance of the protocol by which results are found. For these studies to have been wrongfully, and deceitfully conducted in bad faith should tell you something about the last couple years here on earth. The regulatory specialists aren’t the only people to blame here, obviously considering the broad strokes of totalitarianism seen throughout the world in light of COVID propaganda. This is clearly a concerted effort between people who belong to a group that we don’t subscribe to.

We likely will never see these people brought to justice, seeing as how corrupt the nation has become already. The events occurring have important impacts on humanity that amount to biblical prophecy almost certainly being fulfilled. As i’ve said before, technology can only innovate so far before divine intervention is deemed necessary. Now that we’re at a point in humanity in which people can have their God given traits edited to cater our every whim, it seems as though the ball may be rolling. 1 Corinthians 6:19 says: “Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God? You are not your own,” Stay inquisitive in the word of God, and the world around you.

The unvaccinated devout in the US Air Force will be unable to “aim high,” as individuals requesting religious exemptions from the COVID-19 vaccinations are being grounded and discharged.

The Air Force announced that as of March 15, 2022, it has rejected 5,259 religious accommodation petitions and granted only 23. According to a lawsuit filed by 36 members of the Air Force, Air Force Reserve, and Air National Guard against President Joe Biden’s administration, the rejection percentage is 99.6%.

According to court documents, the Air Force granted at least 3,781 medical and administrative exemptions while denying most religious exemptions. Other Air Force families who are not officially involved in the case but are in the process of losing their employment are keeping an eye on the situation.

According to a Rand Corporation study, the Air Force spends around $5.5 million to train a single pilot. Attorney Kris Kobach of Kansas, who is overseeing the lawsuit, estimates that the 17 pilots in the group represent $93.5 million in taxpayer money spent on training out of the 36 Air Force clients he represents. Some of the Air Force’s most experienced flight instructors, linguists, and cyber warfare professionals make up the organization.

They are mostly stationed at Offutt Air Force Base near Omaha, Nebraska; McConnell Air Force Base in Wichita, Kansas; and a few other locations across the country.

“Most of them are senior pilots, and the idea that we would terminate these pilots, in whom the US has invested tens of millions of dollars, is absurd.” “We’re putting our readiness at risk,” Kobach told The Epoch Times. “There are a few of full-time instructor pilots from Texas, and the commander at that base complains that we aren’t training enough pilots quickly enough, but the military is pushing the removal of very experienced, highly qualified pilots and the instructors who would educate new pilots.” This is complete bullshit. In the sake of preparation, the military is sacrificing its own readiness.”

The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, seeks a preliminary injunction to prevent the terminations.

According to court documents, many of the plaintiffs believe that the human body is God’s temple, and that they must not put anything into it that God has banned or that might affect its functions, particularly things containing messenger RNA (mRNA). Many people do not want to utilize a product that was tested, developed, or produced using aborted fetal cell lines because it would be engaging in the abortion industry, according to the filing.

“The First Amendment does not allow governments to deny someone the free expression of their religion faith,” Kobach said. “In particular, if they treat a comparable secular activity better than the religious activity, it is highly likely to be a violation of the First Amendment.” “The military has granted hundreds of medical and administrative exemptions but almost no religious exemptions in this case.”

According to Kobach, the Air Force’s vaccination program has the effect of screening out some of the military’s most fervent Christians.

“All of these people want to stay in the military,” he remarked, referring to the active duty Air Force and the full-time Reserve. “They’ve put their hearts and souls into this career, and they intend to battle tooth and nail to maintain their place in the Air Force.” When it comes down to it, if they have to choose between their career and their faith, they will choose the latter. Denying the men and women fighting to defend our Constitution against foreign aggressors their own constitutional guarantees is a terrible way to treat them.”

The political purge inside the Department of Defense continues despite the fact that the entire nation is witnessing it occur in real time. It’s hard to say wether or not the American people will wake up to the fact that there is an organized movement under the surface that seeks to weed out all who don’t prove themselves useful to the globalist agenda.

This “agenda” is biblical prophecy, and is still widely overlooked in the Christian community; Whether it be due to lack of awareness, or simply due to being a lukewarm Christian. Either way, prophecy is prophecy for a reason. These events will come to fruition because God wills it. Let the evildoers have their victory today, because Christ will proclaim victory thereafter. Stay inquisitive in the word of God, and the world around you.