Featured Story

More Scientific Crap From the Center for Vaccine Development’s Dr. Hotez: Not Biden’s Fault That 200,000 ‘Defiant’ Unvaccinated Died – Clearly the Far-Right’s ‘Monster’

The Real Monster Hotez

Center for Vaccine Development director Dr. Peter Hotez said Thursday on MSLSD’s “Deadline” that he believes it is not President Joe Biden’s “fault” that 200,000 unvaccinated America have died of coronavirus during his first year in office but instead it is the far-right’s “monster.”

Hotez said, “First of all, let’s face it – it is really not the president’s fault that he’s had 200,000 Americans who needlessly lost their lives because we were defiant of getting vaccines. They refused vaccines.”

He continued, “I mean, that is clearly the fault of the aggression coming from the far-right from far-right members of the Congress to conservative news outlets to the far-right think tanks. They helped create that monster.”

He added, “But the piece that’s not being said is a number of us pleaded with the White House and federal agencies to help vaccinate the world. Because the Alpha variant arose out of the unvaccinated UK. The Delta variant arose out of the unvaccinated Indian sub-continent. Then we said, look, you are doing nothing to vaccinate Africa. What do you think is going to happen? Then, sure enough, the Omicron variant arose out of Southern Africa.”

Hotez concluded, “That part, I think, was a failure.”

Hotez a Liar Read The Commentary Below

Dr. Ioannidis first expressed this sentiment early in the pandemic, writing on March 17^th, 2020 that “A positive test for coronavirus does not mean necessarily that this virus is always primarily responsible for a patient’s demise”. Though this belief has since become widespread, this is the earliest instance I found of someone asserting that the virus might not to blame when someone dies after contracting it. The idea that many people are dying with the virus, not from the virus, remained a feature of his interviews and publications. It’s worth quoting Dr. Ioannidis’s statements in full:

• Now, your point that we’re literally counting, as opposed to estimating, deaths from coronavirus is correct. But I’ll push back that this may not yield mortality figures as accurately as people think. Because of the attention on coronavirus, we’re better at knowing that a deceased person had coronavirus than had the flu. This means we’re good at knowing when someone died with coronavirus – but not necessarily that they died from the infection. We assume that dying with coronavirus is dying from coronavirus. (Medscape)
• So, this is also an open question. Because for the data that we have more mature and detailed information, like the data from Italy that has already through the peak of their epidemic wave, we realize that 99% of people who die with this virus have other reasons as well to die. On average, they have close to three other reasons to die. On average they are 80-years-old with other comorbidities, as we say, and there’s quite some debate on whether these people would have died anyhow, if not immediately, you know, perhaps in a few days or in a few weeks or a few months. In our country we see a fairly similar picture. We see that people who are disadvantaged, poor people, creating even further inequality in the population through COVID-19, seem to be very hard hit. We see that the age of death on average is a little bit lower compared to European countries, in the range of 73 or 74-years-old, and we see again lots of comorbidities in people who die with COVID-19. It’s very hard to say how many of these people would have died anyhow and how much is the direct contribution of the virus. These data are evolving, but if anything they suggest that the burden of disease as we call it, the number of person-years lost, how many years of life are being lost, is much less than even what the number of deaths would suggest. This is not to minimize the problem. It is a serious problem. (Fox; start listening at 5:05)
• COVID-19 has become a notifiable disease, so it is readily recorded in death certificates. What we do know, however, is that the vast majority of people who die with a COVID-19 label have at least one and typically many other comorbidities. This means that often they have other reasons that would lead them to death. The relative contribution of COVID-19 needs very careful audit and evaluation of medical records. (Greek Reporter)
• Finally, a major question that should be answered is the causal contribution of SARS-CoV-2 infection to related deaths. It is difficult to differentiate between deaths with SARS-CoV-2 infection and deaths caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection because the vast majority of patients who have died had 1 or more other major pathologies (98.8% with at least 1 comorbidity, and 48.6% having 3 or more diseases) that contributed to their death. (JAMA Internal Medicine)
• When I made that tentative quote (estimating that COVID-19 will cause fewer than 40,000 deaths in the US), I had not considered the impact of the new case definition of COVID-19 and of COVID-19 becoming a notifiable disease despite being aware of the Italian experience where almost all counted “COVID-19 deaths” also had other concomitant causes of death/comorbidities. “COVID-19 death” now includes not only “deaths by COVID-19” and “deaths with COVID-19”, but even deaths “without COVID-19 documented”. (Int J Forecast)
• The number of COVID-19 deaths can be both undercounted and overcounted, and the relative ratio of over- and under-counting varies across different locations. In most European countries and the USA it is more likely to be overcounted, especially if we are talking about “deaths by COVID-19″…For COVID-19 we are in early days, and we need to be careful to dissociate deaths from COVID-19 versus deaths that happened because of the disruption induced by lockdown. (Greek Reporter)
• Another observation that has emerged is that many of these people (in Italy) probably would have had very limited life expectancy in the absence of that infection, and it still remains to be decided how many of these infections are deaths with SARS-CoV-2 versus deaths by SARS-CoV-2, meaning that the virus has the key influence on the outcome rather than just giving a final kick or participating among many other factors in shaping the outcome, but these people having multiple other reasons that they would have a very poor endpoint and eventually die, many of them. (Daily Motion; start listening at 18:45)

Likely there are other instances where he expressed similar sentiments of which I am currently unaware.

Pestilence On The Move

This Is the Same Individual That Asked Biden’s Administration to Prosecute Anyone That Disagreed With These Kill Shot Vaccines, Hotez Dirt Bag Extraordinaire

Dr. Death ‘Scientists’ As Hate Crime…

Physicist Richard P. Feynman once said “Religion is a culture of faith; science is a culture of doubt.” 

God has sent them ( The Un-godly ) a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness” (2 Thessalonians 2:10-12). Simply put, God sends a strong delusion to those who chose not to believe the gospel of Christ. Those who take delight in mocking and rejecting Him, He will condemn.

Feynman’s statement captures how science depends upon constant questioning and challenging of assumptions. Yet, what is healthy debate to some is criminal dissent to others. Dr. Peter Hotez, a professor of pediatrics and molecular virology at Baylor College of Medicine is calling for federal hate-crime protections to be extended to cover criticism of Dr. Anthony Fauci and other scientists.

The frequent MSLSD and Pedophile Producers over at CNN guest wants Congress to expand hate crimes to “scientists currently targeted by far-right extremism in the United States.”

Center for Vaccine Development director Dr. Peter Hotez said Tuesday on MSNBC’s “MTP Daily” that he believes, especially for health care workers, people will need coronavirus booster shots every three months.

Hotez said, “Now we have an added problem, and that is specific to the Omicron variant, that third booster was holding up so well for Delta, Alpha and other variants, for Omicron, it is waning really quickly.”

Anchor Chuck Todd said, “So we know that Moderna is apparently working on a booster that would tackle Omicron. Are we going to be in this sort of gap, it sounds like? I mean, look, we’re all thinking selfishly. I’m sure when people just heard what you said about the booster for health care workers, are you saying at three months from our booster, we probably need another booster?”

Hotez said, “I think so. And again, it is to prevent infection and long COVID, particularly among our health care workers. I’ll leave to the federal agencies to offer an opinion about the general population. But at least let’s protect that population because that is critical. As far as the Omicron-specific booster, we won’t have it in time for this epidemic. Also, we have other vulnerabilities. At least one or two of the monoclonal antibodies does not work against the Omicron variant. So we take that off the table.”

Say hello to Granite Ridge Soap-works! Use our handmade soaps to take good care of your skin. Our premium natural ingredients work together to create a silky, creamy lather that hydrates your skin. Chemicals, such as sodium lauryl sulfate, phthalates, parabens, or detergents, are never used by us. To ensure quality, we make all of our soaps in modest quantities. Visit our Etsy store right away to give them a try and the attention your skin deserves. GraniteRidgeSoapworks: Because only the best will do for your skin.

Use the code HNEWS15 to receive 15% off your first purchase.

Source: HNewsWire      breitbart