Fauci Comments On Looming House Republican Investigations Into Gain Of Function Research In Wuhan.

If Republicans retake control of the House in the 2022 midterm elections, White House COVID-19 adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci says he expects to be probed.

“It’s the Benghazi hearings all over again,” Fauci told The Washington Post on March 15, referring to a number of Republican lawmakers pledging to investigate alleged gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, which is close to where the first COVID-19 cases were reported in late 2019.

Potential hearings, according to Fauci, an unelected government official who has led the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, “It would distract me from doing my work, the way it is now.” “There will be nothing there,” Fauci predicted if there are hearings and an investigation.

His allusion to the Benghazi hearings appeared to be a dig at former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who was the focus of Republicans probing the 2012 attacks on a consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that killed many Americans.

Several leading House Republicans have stated publicly that they will investigate Fauci’s organization and its ties to Wuhan research.

“And if you’re watching this, Dr. Fauci, be on the lookout,” Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) told Fox News last week. “Because when the Americans give us control in the House of Representatives, God willing, we’re going to get some answers on behalf of the American people.”

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, told Just the News that the GOP will look into the NIAID chief’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Jordan said the investigation will also look at whether taxpayer funds were used to fund contentious “gain-of-function” research.

Fauci told ABC News in October 2021 that he stood by his statement during a Senate hearing that neither NIAID nor the National Institutes of Health, which controls NIAID, financed gain-of-function research in China.

“The financing at the Wuhan Institute was to be able to determine what is out there in the environment, in bat viruses in China,” Fauci explained. “And the research was conducted in strict accordance with what we refer to as a research oversight framework.” And it does not represent research of gain of function of concern under those conditions, as we have demonstrated quite clearly.”

During midterm elections, the president’s party has a history of losing seats in the House and Senate. Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D-NY), the leader of the Democrats’ midterm election organization, has made public statements that appear to indicate that the party is attempting to refocus its rhetoric ahead of the November elections.

“It’s not the voters who are the issue…. Maloney reportedly told fellow Democrats at a conference over the weekend, “The problem is us.” “They believe we are polarizing and fixated on cultural matters.” We’re perceived as preachy by them. When it comes to their children in schools, they believe we act as though we knew more than the parents.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci was notified in a private teleconference that the CCP virus had most certainly leaked from a Chinese laboratory, yet he continued to promote the alternative narrative that it had spontaneously emerged, according to new evidence.

The director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Anthony Fauci, may have initiated efforts to cover up evidence pointing to a laboratory leak as the source of the CCP virus, according to redacted emails recently made public.

Evidence reveals that Fauci swayed a highly influential academic study that was initially published on February 16, 2020, before being published in the prestigious science publication Nature, which ruled out such a possibility.

Five virologists collaborated on the research article, titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” four of whom joined Fauci on a teleconference on Feb. 1, 2020.

At least three of the paper’s authors indicated during the phone conference that they were “60 to 80% convinced” that the CCP virus came from a lab, a point they repeated in emails following the call.

Public claims of a possible relationship between the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China and the CCP virus outbreak surfaced at the time, but Fauci and other medical professionals disregarded these reports as conspiracy theories.

This includes Peter Daszak, founder of EcoHealth Alliance, the nonprofit that funneled United States grant money to scientists in Wuhan and the other authors, who published a statement that read, “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”

In an interview with EpochTV’s “Crossroads” program, Jeff Carlson and Hans Mahncke, hosts of “Truth Over News,” argued that the latest data suggests that Fauci was fully aware that the CCP virus had likely leaked from the Wuhan lab in China, but deliberately pushed a different narrative.

“Proximal origin takes the firm side of the natural origin for the virus. And it’s been used by the media and by the government to debunk any talk of a lab leak. As a matter of fact, that’s what was used to push back on anybody saying anything like that was the established science,” Carlson added.

“Well, the first version of proximal origin was finished on the very same day as the teleconference. So just sort of let that sink in, at the time that Fauci and Collins [National Institutes of Health head Francis Collins] and Farrar [Jeremy Farrar, the head of the UK’s Wellcome Trust], the senior funding, the heads of our health institutions are being told privately that it’s anywhere in the range of 60 to 80 percent likely that this virus has a lab origin, they complete the first draft of proximal origin, which is later used to promote a narrative of a natural origin as opposed to a lab leak origin for the virus,” Said Carlson.

Despite evidence to the contrary, Carlson and Mahncke claimed that Fauci went public with the assertion that he was uninformed of the claims being made by academics attending the teleconference.

“What’s new about these emails are the details that have come out through these unredacted emails. Before when there was that email dump, all the emails were basically redacted 95 percent or so or just gray, gray, gray… so now we know what’s behind those redactions, some of them, and what we found out is the level of detail that the scientists already knew at the time about the engineered features of the virus,” Said Mahncke.

“So all the stuff that we’ve found out in the past two years, they knew all that on Feb. 1, 2020 … and instead of alerting the world to the fact that there’s an engineered virus that’s hitting the world, Fauci does the exact opposite. He goes out there and says, ‘No, this is all natural,’” Mahncke stated.

Fauci was requested to help create a response letter to the Trump White House’s query about the virus’s origins at a meeting of the National Academy of Sciences on Feb. 3, just two days after the teleconference with the authors of “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2.” In which he reiterated his belief that the CCP virus emerged naturally rather than from a laboratory.

“So right from the start, Fauci is pushing really hard and in various forums, all in the same direction, natural, natural, natural,” Mahncke said. “But at the same time, he was told not only that it’s very likely that it came out of the lab, but he was told the details; that to me is very fascinating.”

Fauci denied having interacted with the authors when asked explicitly during his testimony before Congress earlier this month.

Although data gathered by US intelligence agencies and other experts suggests that the CCP virus developed in a lab, other officials argue that it has a natural origin.

EcoHealth Alliance utilized government money to fund research on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, according to records obtained by The Intercept in connection with a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the publication against the National Institutes of Health.

We live in a peculiar time, in which people will blindly disregard logical explanations for catastrophes such as this one. Additional context and a wider perspective of global politics is needed to make sense of the bold claims we make about these disgusting people. But to defend the credibility of these people while disregarding a logical explanation for the origin of this virus, displays an irrefutable lack of longing for the truth. It would be unwise to go about your life assuming that nobody seeks to see you suffer. Evil exists, and you don’t deter it by ignoring every sign brought to your attention.

The internet has proved to be a place in which you can tune into various frequencies in search of a perspective that best fits your narrative. I could make up an argument on the fly and back it up with facts pertaining to my argument. With that being said, the news about COVID-19 is terrifyingly polarizing. There is a spectrum, by which all narratives of the COVID-19 agenda are carefully presented to anyone conducting research. The opposing sides of the spectrum are those who are sold on the COVID-19 pandemic, and those who aren’t sold at all.

But it becomes extremely important that we listen to our gut, when we notice that someone is eyeballing something that rightfully belongs to you. Our civil liberties are merely gods gift to man interpreted by men of power. No man, woman, government, organization, forum, or anything will prosper as a weapon against God. With that being said, when our God given rights are at stake, it is probably best to question the integrity of those who propose the removal of such rights. In summary, if you’re not a “conspiracy theorist” you probably aren’t asking very many questions about the world around you.

My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.

Hosea 4:6