Fauci Once Again Recommending Additional Boosters.

Anthony Fauci, a White House COVID-19 adviser, said on Monday that further COVID-19 vaccines are likely to be required.

Fauci was asked how many additional COVID-19 vaccine doses, or boosters, will be required in an interview with CNBC.

“The answer is that we have no idea.” That’s all there is to it… In response, Fauci, who has led the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since 1984, said, “It’s likely that we’re not done with this when it comes to vaccines.”

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla had indicated the need for a fourth COVID-19 booster dose the day before.

“The protection you receive from the third vaccine is not that good against infections,” he conceded to CBS News, “but it doesn’t last very long.” He added, “But we are just presenting those data to the FDA and then we will see what the experts outside Pfizer say.” As a result, he believes that a “fourth boost” is “required right now.”

Bourla announced last week that his company would seek emergency use authorisation for a second booster. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted approval for a third dosage of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine earlier this year.

In February, Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, the maker of the other FDA-approved mRNA vaccine, hinted at the possibility of a fourth vaccination.

In an interview with CNBC, Bancel remarked, “We believe there’s a high possibility that we’re heading into an endemic setting.” “We should still be cautious because, as we saw with Delta, which arrived after Alpha and was more virulent, the more virulent variant is always possible.”

Fauci’s remarks came as a number of Republican legislators have increased their criticism of the public health official in recent days.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who has sparred with Fauci over the virus’s origins in Senate hearings, offered an amendment on Monday that would abolish Fauci’s position.

In announcing the amendment, Paul, a doctor, said, “No one person should have unilateral ability to make decisions for millions of Americans.” “This action will ensure that useless, unscientific lockdowns and mandates are never forced on the American people again,” he continued.

The National Institutes of Health, which controls Fauci’s organization, said in a statement to The Epoch Times that it does not comment on pending legislation.

Several Republicans, including Reps. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), committed last week to probe Fauci if Republicans gain control of the House.

“And if you’re watching this, Dr. Fauci, keep an eye on us because, God willing, when the American people give us control of the House of Representatives, we’re going to get some answers on behalf of the American people,” Roy said in a Fox News interview.

Dr. Anthony Fauci was notified in a private teleconference that the CCP virus had most certainly leaked from a Chinese laboratory, yet he continued to promote the alternative narrative that it had spontaneously emerged, according to new evidence.

The director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Anthony Fauci, may have initiated efforts to cover up evidence pointing to a laboratory leak as the source of the CCP virus, according to redacted emails recently made public.

Evidence reveals that Fauci swayed a highly influential academic study that was initially published on February 16, 2020, before being published in the prestigious science publication Nature, which ruled out such a possibility.

Five virologists collaborated on the research article, titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” four of whom joined Fauci on a teleconference on Feb. 1, 2020.

At least three of the paper’s authors indicated during the phone conference that they were “60 to 80% convinced” that the CCP virus came from a lab, a point they repeated in emails following the call.

Public claims of a possible relationship between the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China and the CCP virus outbreak surfaced at the time, but Fauci and other medical professionals disregarded these reports as conspiracy theories.

This includes Peter Daszak, founder of EcoHealth Alliance, the nonprofit that funneled United States grant money to scientists in Wuhan and the other authors, who published a statement that read, “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”

In an interview with EpochTV’s “Crossroads” program, Jeff Carlson and Hans Mahncke, hosts of “Truth Over News,” argued that the latest data suggests that Fauci was fully aware that the CCP virus had likely leaked from the Wuhan lab in China, but deliberately pushed a different narrative.

“Proximal origin takes the firm side of the natural origin for the virus. And it’s been used by the media and by the government to debunk any talk of a lab leak. As a matter of fact, that’s what was used to push back on anybody saying anything like that was the established science,” Carlson added.

“Well, the first version of proximal origin was finished on the very same day as the teleconference. So just sort of let that sink in, at the time that Fauci and Collins [National Institutes of Health head Francis Collins] and Farrar [Jeremy Farrar, the head of the UK’s Wellcome Trust], the senior funding, the heads of our health institutions are being told privately that it’s anywhere in the range of 60 to 80 percent likely that this virus has a lab origin, they complete the first draft of proximal origin, which is later used to promote a narrative of a natural origin as opposed to a lab leak origin for the virus,” Said Carlson.

Despite evidence to the contrary, Carlson and Mahncke claimed that Fauci went public with the assertion that he was uninformed of the claims being made by academics attending the teleconference.

“What’s new about these emails are the details that have come out through these unredacted emails. Before when there was that email dump, all the emails were basically redacted 95 percent or so or just gray, gray, gray… so now we know what’s behind those redactions, some of them, and what we found out is the level of detail that the scientists already knew at the time about the engineered features of the virus,” Said Mahncke.

“So all the stuff that we’ve found out in the past two years, they knew all that on Feb. 1, 2020 … and instead of alerting the world to the fact that there’s an engineered virus that’s hitting the world, Fauci does the exact opposite. He goes out there and says, ‘No, this is all natural,’” Mahncke stated.

Fauci was requested to help create a response letter to the Trump White House’s query about the virus’s origins at a meeting of the National Academy of Sciences on Feb. 3, just two days after the teleconference with the authors of “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2.” In which he reiterated his belief that the CCP virus emerged naturally rather than from a laboratory.

“So right from the start, Fauci is pushing really hard and in various forums, all in the same direction, natural, natural, natural,” Mahncke said. “But at the same time, he was told not only that it’s very likely that it came out of the lab, but he was told the details; that to me is very fascinating.”

Fauci denied having interacted with the authors when asked explicitly during his testimony before Congress earlier this month.

Although data gathered by US intelligence agencies and other experts suggests that the CCP virus developed in a lab, other officials argue that it has a natural origin.

EcoHealth Alliance utilized government money to fund research on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, according to records obtained by The Intercept in connection with a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the publication against the National Institutes of Health.

We live in a peculiar time, in which people will blindly disregard logical explanations for catastrophes such as this one. Additional context and a wider perspective of global politics is needed to make sense of the bold claims we make about these disgusting people. But to defend the credibility of these people while disregarding a logical explanation for the origin of this virus, displays an irrefutable lack of longing for the truth. It would be unwise to go about your life assuming that nobody seeks to see you suffer. Evil exists, and you don’t deter it by ignoring every sign brought to your attention.

The internet has proved to be a place in which you can tune into various frequencies in search of a perspective that best fits your narrative. I could make up an argument on the fly and back it up with facts pertaining to my argument. With that being said, the news about COVID-19 is terrifyingly polarizing. There is a spectrum, by which all narratives of the COVID-19 agenda are carefully presented to anyone conducting research. The opposing sides of the spectrum are those who are sold on the COVID-19 pandemic, and those who aren’t sold at all.

But it becomes extremely important that we listen to our gut, when we notice that someone is eyeballing something that rightfully belongs to you. Our civil liberties are merely gods gift to man interpreted by men of power. No man, woman, government, organization, forum, or anything will prosper as a weapon against God. With that being said, when our God given rights are at stake, it is probably best to question the integrity of those who propose the removal of such rights. In summary, if you’re not a “conspiracy theorist” you probably aren’t asking very many questions about the world around you.

My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.

Hosea 4:6