Pale Horse In Play: The W.H.O. Will Try and Use Monkeypox to Push Vaccine Passports and Global Surveillance, Satan Soldier BS Con Man “Dr” Gates, He Has the “Cure” for Every Crisis Before the Crisis Even Begins
As per their plans written in 26 languages on the Georgia Stones, as the Word of God outlines in Revelation, Daniel and other books.
The result of receiving the "mark on your DNA from the beast" is in Revelation 16 v. 2. Basically, The result of WORSHIPING the beast (the other choice) gives a promise in a number of places of eternal damnation.
As a serious danger, monkeypox has to be taken seriously. It's possible, but is it true?
Not really, says Dr. Robert Malone. It's understandable if you were under the impression otherwise. "Provides a quintessential example of public health fear-porn," as Malone recently highlighted about the virus's media coverage.
Malone said that CNN should be penalized for disseminating "irresponsible propaganda—misinformation and disinformation—under the garb of journalism" in its coverage of the Ebola crisis. With "traditional public health methods," he thinks this sickness and virus, which is "endemic in Africa" can be "readily managed."
This tiny disease "has never been regarded a high danger pathogen in the past" because it "does not [emphasis mine] have a high fatality rate," which is more important.
In closing, Malone urged the media and "so-called medical authorities" to "stop the fear mongering, misinformation and distortion." Malone.
Malone's appeal has been rejected, and physicians throughout the globe have told us to brace for the worst.. Biden has also joined the chorus of doomsayers. The World Health Organization (WHO) is also making a splash.
The WHO, on the other hand, is making measures that might have a major impact on billions of people throughout the globe, including those in the United States.
The Panopticon Reimagined
Monkeypox was discussed in a "emergency meeting" conducted by the WHO on May 20.
STAG-IH members, who "advise on infection risks that potentially pose a worldwide health hazard" according to Reuters, will shortly determine if "the epidemic should be labeled a public health emergency of international concern." STAG-IH members, according to Reuters.
It shouldn't, as highlighted by the aforementioned Dr. Malone. The WHO, on the other hand, may have a different opinion.
WHO members are presently working on a new pandemic prevention and preparation pact, which is one of the world's most powerful organizations. For the foreseeable future, the drafting process will be on-going. On the 1st of August, the committee will convene to review its progress. They want to present their findings at the 76th World Health Assembly (WHA) in 2019. Two years from now, if all goes according to plan, the adjustments will be implemented.
Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus of the World Health Organization (WHO) addresses the beginning of the 74th World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland on May 24, 2021.
What Kind of Modifications Have Been Made?
For those protecting free expression and exposing government overreach, such as those at Reclaim the Net, be prepared for drastic changes. Given that the writers of Reclaim claim to have obtained a copy of the WHO's intentions in draft form, the following cautions should be taken seriously.
WHA, the World Health Organization's governing body, "aims to get this treaty ratified under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution." That means that "if two-thirds [of WHA members] vote in favor of them, the WHA will have the right to enforce legally binding agreements on WHO member nations." There are 195 nations in the globe, and the World Health Organization has 194 members.
An worldwide pandemic agreement has been proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO). As Reclaim has discovered, this agreement has extended to include a wide range of "health situations."
As defined by the World Health Organization, a public health emergency is a situation that "may demand prompt international action" and "carries repercussions for public health beyond the afflicted state's national boundary."
The wording is intentionally broad so that people in power may pursue any purpose, no matter how wicked it may be.
The WHO would have "sweeping, legally binding powers to coerce member nations to adopt many of the censorship and monitoring methods that were enforced during the COVID-19 epidemic" if such an all-encompassing treaty were to be signed.
It's not out of the question that vaccination passports may be implemented around the globe. Because of this, member states will be legally compelled to "help the establishment of standards for providing a digital form [of an] international vaccination certificate and prophylaxis," as the draft lays out.
At the same time it hopes that using "digital technology apps" when traveling internationally would become more commonplace. Contact tracking applications and comprehensive, self-declaration health questionnaires are exactly what you're picturing.
Surveillance, of course, is closely linked to vaccination passports and contact tracking. To be more explicit, the practice of constant monitoring from afar. The WHO will conduct "coordinated worldwide monitoring of public health concerns," according to a draft of the document. Only when all 194 of the WHO's member nations enhance their monitoring systems and contribute to the organization's "global surveillance systems" would this be possible.
At Reclaim, writers point up the need of working with non-state actors, which "may include Big Tech corporations," as well as other foreign partners. Why? To use their "substantial data to "build the strongest possible early warning and reaction systems."
Dr. Malone, as previously stated, is a strong proponent of putting a stop to the transmission of falsehoods and misinformation. The same is called for in the treaty's text. Authors call for a worldwide effort "to combat the misinformation, distortion, and stigmatization that hinder public health," and encourage members to support it.
The WHO's appeal to "address" the situation seems, at best, dishonest, given its history of disseminating incorrect information. Disingenuous communications, on the other hand, should be the least of our worries in this situation. The panopticon's light will beam much brighter if the present proposal becomes law. There will be no place to run or hide from this attack. This means that our right to privacy, or at least a degree of privacy, is going to be a thing of the past.
It’s interesting to me you don’t find the words plague(s) and pestilence in the New Testament under any context other than the judgment of God. (In fact, for the most part, the context of those words in the Old Testament is also within the judgment of God.)
Pestilence is only used in the Olivet discourse (as signs of the times of judgment):
Luke 21:10-11 (KJV)
Then said he unto them, “Nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: And great earthquakes shall be in divers [several, many] places, and famines, and pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be from heaven.”
And plague(s) is only used in the book of Revelation, too many to write out here, so I’ll list them:
Revelation 9:18, 20 – 11:6, – 15:1, – 6, 8; – 16:9, 21 – 18:4, 8 – 21:9 – 22:18.
Thus from a Biblical perspective, plagues and pestilences are the result of judgments of God.
When genetic scientists decided to recklessly meddle with the human immune system, the aftermath of the first round of gene therapy jabs guaranteed only one thing: ongoing direct access to humans for an unending series of additional gene therapy shots. For those who died as a result, no apologies will be forthcoming.
The next big wave of COVID infections, already hitting states such as Michigan, will be dominated by people who have been fully vaccinated.
This was predicted by the authors of a scientific study published in a British medical journal.
Between 60 and 70 percent of “third wave” COVID deaths and hospitalizations will be from people who were fully vaccinated, according to the study, Summary of Further Modeling of Easing Restrictions, published March 31 by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
This may at least partially explain why Detroit-area hospitals are filling up with COVID patients.
But you won’t read about this angle to the story from anyone in the mainstream media. They are reporting the story as simply a new wave of COVID hospitalizations and deaths caused by a UK-based variant of the virus that has nothing to do with the high rate of vaccinations. [See Detroit News, April 15, 2021, Beaumont nears COVID hospital capacity as experts warn of ‘new pandemic.’]
Mainstream news outlets have yet to express the tiniest bit of curiosity as to why the big spike in COVID is taking place even as large percentages of the public have been vaccinated [Michigan is one of the most-vaccinated states in the nation with nearly 30 percent of Michiganders receiving the jab]. In fact, health officials quoted in the above Detroit News article are blaming “vaccine hesitancy” for the new wave, a diabolical falsification of what’s going on in Michigan meant to put more pressure on the people who refuse the unproven experimental injection.
Apparently those health officials haven’t read the new British study, which states:
“The resurgence in both hospitalizations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave respectively. This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age
groups, such that immunization failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals.” [See page 10, summary point No. 32].
And what do the British scientists who authored the study say is the answer to this dilemma of the fully vaccinated coming down with COVID? Why, more vaccines and more lockdowns, of course!
And Big Pharma is more than happy to comply. Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla announced a “third dose” of its vaccine will be needed within 12 months of the second dose and likely another dose every year after that. As we predicted, the globalists planned all along to use COVID to scare people into getting annual injections. Nobody knows what’s in these injections or how they will affect human health in the medium and long term.
The scenario taking shape is beginning to look like the one Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche warned us about in early March. Based on his years of experience in the vaccine industry, Vanden Bossche called for a halt to the mass vaccination programs being conducted “in the middle of a pandemic.” He said that if the jabs were not halted they would lead to the creation of stronger and stronger variants of the virus until a “super virus” takes hold and wipes out huge numbers of people. [See Top vaccine expert calls for global moratorium on COVID injections, LeoHohmann.com, March 17, 2021]
Mental-health ethicist Niall McCrae noted that “the report’s prediction that 70% of COVID-19 deaths will be of dual-vaccinated people is quite startling.”
Leave a Comment