Pale Horse In Play: The W.H.O. Will Try and Use Monkeypox to Push Vaccine Passports and Global Surveillance, Satan Soldier BS Con Man “Dr” Gates, He Has the “Cure” for Every Crisis Before the Crisis Even Begins

HNewsWire:

As per their plans written in 26 languages on the Georgia Stones, as the Word of God outlines in Revelation, Daniel and other books.

The result of receiving the "mark on your DNA from the beast" is in Revelation 16 v. 2. Basically, The result of WORSHIPING the beast (the other choice) gives a promise in a number of places of eternal damnation.

As a serious danger, monkeypox has to be taken seriously. It's possible, but is it true?

Not really, says Dr. Robert Malone. It's understandable if you were under the impression otherwise. "Provides a quintessential example of public health fear-porn," as Malone recently highlighted about the virus's media coverage.

Malone said that CNN should be penalized for disseminating "irresponsible propaganda—misinformation and disinformation—under the garb of journalism" in its coverage of the Ebola crisis. With "traditional public health methods," he thinks this sickness and virus, which is "endemic in Africa" can be "readily managed."

This tiny disease "has never been regarded a high danger pathogen in the past" because it "does not [emphasis mine] have a high fatality rate," which is more important.

In closing, Malone urged the media and "so-called medical authorities" to "stop the fear mongering, misinformation and distortion." Malone.

Malone's appeal has been rejected, and physicians throughout the globe have told us to brace for the worst.. Biden has also joined the chorus of doomsayers. The World Health Organization (WHO) is also making a splash.

The WHO, on the other hand, is making measures that might have a major impact on billions of people throughout the globe, including those in the United States.
The Panopticon Reimagined

Monkeypox was discussed in a "emergency meeting" conducted by the WHO on May 20.

STAG-IH members, who "advise on infection risks that potentially pose a worldwide health hazard" according to Reuters, will shortly determine if "the epidemic should be labeled a public health emergency of international concern." STAG-IH members, according to Reuters.

It shouldn't, as highlighted by the aforementioned Dr. Malone. The WHO, on the other hand, may have a different opinion.

WHO members are presently working on a new pandemic prevention and preparation pact, which is one of the world's most powerful organizations. For the foreseeable future, the drafting process will be on-going. On the 1st of August, the committee will convene to review its progress. They want to present their findings at the 76th World Health Assembly (WHA) in 2019. Two years from now, if all goes according to plan, the adjustments will be implemented.

Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus of the World Health Organization (WHO) addresses the beginning of the 74th World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland on May 24, 2021.
What Kind of Modifications Have Been Made?

For those protecting free expression and exposing government overreach, such as those at Reclaim the Net, be prepared for drastic changes. Given that the writers of Reclaim claim to have obtained a copy of the WHO's intentions in draft form, the following cautions should be taken seriously.

WHA, the World Health Organization's governing body, "aims to get this treaty ratified under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution." That means that "if two-thirds [of WHA members] vote in favor of them, the WHA will have the right to enforce legally binding agreements on WHO member nations." There are 195 nations in the globe, and the World Health Organization has 194 members.

An worldwide pandemic agreement has been proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO). As Reclaim has discovered, this agreement has extended to include a wide range of "health situations."

As defined by the World Health Organization, a public health emergency is a situation that "may demand prompt international action" and "carries repercussions for public health beyond the afflicted state's national boundary."

The wording is intentionally broad so that people in power may pursue any purpose, no matter how wicked it may be.

The WHO would have "sweeping, legally binding powers to coerce member nations to adopt many of the censorship and monitoring methods that were enforced during the COVID-19 epidemic" if such an all-encompassing treaty were to be signed.

It's not out of the question that vaccination passports may be implemented around the globe. Because of this, member states will be legally compelled to "help the establishment of standards for providing a digital form [of an] international vaccination certificate and prophylaxis," as the draft lays out.

At the same time it hopes that using "digital technology apps" when traveling internationally would become more commonplace. Contact tracking applications and comprehensive, self-declaration health questionnaires are exactly what you're picturing.

Surveillance, of course, is closely linked to vaccination passports and contact tracking. To be more explicit, the practice of constant monitoring from afar. The WHO will conduct "coordinated worldwide monitoring of public health concerns," according to a draft of the document. Only when all 194 of the WHO's member nations enhance their monitoring systems and contribute to the organization's "global surveillance systems" would this be possible.

At Reclaim, writers point up the need of working with non-state actors, which "may include Big Tech corporations," as well as other foreign partners. Why? To use their "substantial data to "build the strongest possible early warning and reaction systems."

Dr. Malone, as previously stated, is a strong proponent of putting a stop to the transmission of falsehoods and misinformation. The same is called for in the treaty's text. Authors call for a worldwide effort "to combat the misinformation, distortion, and stigmatization that hinder public health," and encourage members to support it.

The WHO's appeal to "address" the situation seems, at best, dishonest, given its history of disseminating incorrect information. Disingenuous communications, on the other hand, should be the least of our worries in this situation. The panopticon's light will beam much brighter if the present proposal becomes law. There will be no place to run or hide from this attack. This means that our right to privacy, or at least a degree of privacy, is going to be a thing of the past.