Are Pathological Liars…
This week, Dr. Fauci confirmed that “at some time in the future” everyone will likely need a booster shot for the Covid-19 vaccine due to “fading efficacy.”
Now, Axios reports that a new preprint study which has ‘already grabbed the attention of top Biden administration officials’ over the vaccines’ effectiveness against new variants, with Pfizer’s jab being of particular concern.
The study found the Pfizer vaccine was only 42% effective against infection in July, when the Delta variant was dominant. “If that’s not a wakeup call, I don’t know what is,” a senior Biden official told Axios.
The study, conducted by nference and the Mayo Clinic, compared the effectiveness of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines in the Mayo Clinic Health System over time from January to July. -Axios
The overall figures suggest that the vaccines provide robust (yet lower-than advertised) immunity early on, only to sharply drop in efficacy over time.
Between January and July, Moderna’s vaccine was found to be 86% effective against infection over the study period, while Pfizer’s was 76%. As far as hospitalization, Moderna’s vaccine was 92% effective, while Pfizer’s was 85%.
Bringing the averages down, of course, was the sharp drop in efficacy observed in July with Moderna proving just 72% effective against infection and Pfizer clocking in at 42%.
In other states such as Florida, the risk of infection in July among those who had taken the Moderna vaccine was around 60% lower than for people full vaccinated with Pfizer.
More via Axios:
Why it matters: Although it has yet to be peer-reviewed, the study raises serious questions about both vaccines’ long-term effectiveness, particularly Pfizer’s.
- It’s unclear whether the results signify a reduction in effectiveness over time, a reduced effectiveness against Delta, or a combination of both.
- “Based on the data that we have so far, it is a combination of both factors,” said Venky Soundararajan,a lead author of the study. “The Moderna vaccine is likely — very likely — more effective than the Pfizer vaccine in areas where Delta is the dominant strain, and the Pfizer vaccine appears to have a lower durability of effectiveness.”
- He added that his team is working on a follow-up study that will try to differentiate between the durability of the two vaccines and their effectiveness against Delta.
Bring on the boosters.
Within the space of a few days, the narrative has shifted from “if” booster shots are even necessary, to “only for immunocompromised“, to “only for those who got vaccinations early on, due to fading efficacy“, and now today, His Omniscience Anthony Fauci told ‘CBS This Morning’ that while it is imminent that immune compromised people will get Covid-19 vaccine booster shots, it is likely that at some point in the future everyone will need one.
“It’s likely that that will happen at some time in the future,” Fauci said, when asked if everyone will need a booster shot at some point.
That’s “science” folks!
Fauci noted that this is data is being followed in real time, “literally on a weekly and monthly basis,” with cohorts of all different populations to determine if the level of protection is starting to attenuate.
“When it does get to a certain level, we will be prepared to give boosters to those people, but from what you just said a moment ago, it is imminent that we will be giving it to immune compromised,” he said.
As a reminder, the FDA is reportedly expected to announce soon that it will authorize COVID-19 vaccine booster shots for immunocompromised Americans.
Fauci also said during an interview on NBC News’ “Today” show Thursday, that:
“Inevitably, there will be a time when we’ll have to give boosts to the general population.”
As far as furiously moving goalposts goes, Fauci admittred earlier in the week that the Delta variant presents the additional problem that vaccinated people can also transmit the virus to someone else. That has led to the CDC revising its mask guidelines recently. But, he stressed:
“The vaccines are still doing what you originally want them to do — to keep you out of the hospital to prevent you from getting seriously ill.”
Actually, what the CDC “originally” wanted the vaccines to do, was to prevent those who were jabbed from infecting others. Only later did we learn that too was a fabrication.
Perhaps the most ‘new’ science is the following…
“No vaccine, at least not within this category, is going to have an indefinite amount of protection.”
Fauci comments come as debate grows over “breakthrough” infections among fully vaccinated people and whether approval should be given for booster shots. On Sunday, Israel, the first nation to roll out booster shots widely, said it had given more than 420,000 third shots to people 60 and over. At least 14 Israelis have already caught Covid-19 after having been injected with a booster shot, suggesting that the booster shot will be the first of many, and will likely last all the way through the mid-term elections because, well, mail-in ballots next November.
Which all sounds very different from the constant bombardment of “get jabbed and be free and fearless” that was punched down America’s throat for most of the first half of 2021 by the Biden administration and every local health policy bureaucrat desperate to virtue signal their way to a job for life.
So the new question is… How will virtue-signaling stores/restaurants/companies with vaccine-mandated entry policies police this? Will people have be triple jabbed to be allowed to enter? Quadruple-jabbed?
Health officials continue to lose credibility over COVID-19. They seem to change their minds daily based on whim rather than science. But that’s been the case since the pandemic started.
Going back to last January, official comments on COVID have been mostly wrong. The comments were either outright lies or were prescriptions based on politics, not medicine.
In January 2020, the World Health Organization said there was no human-to-human transmission of COVID. They knew better because of data from China, so that was a lie. Dr. Anthony Fauci said there was little risk of COVID coming from China to the U.S. Another lie.
Then, over the course of 15 months, Fauci said not to wear masks, then he said to wear them, then he said you could take them off. Now, he says it’s time to put them on again.
Fauci is an over-the-hill bureaucrat, not a true scientist. His greatest skill has been successfully navigating the Washington swamp for the past four decades. He’s heavily conflicted because he owns patents on inputs to the vaccines.
Please Do Not Post Hnewswire Articles on Brighteon, Gab, Parler, FaceBook, Reddit or Twatter Social Media Platform, We Are Not Comfortable With Their Anti-Christian — Anti-American Nazi Philosophy. StevieRay Hansen
I Have Never Seen The Righteous Forsaken or Begging For Rain
Luciferian Death Cult
Mr.Evil, a.k.a Dr.Death ( Dr.Fauci ) agrees with the White House and Biden himself,saying vaccination mandates should be the next step.
Who is to blame? Corrupt politicians or the stupid people who vote for them
FakeBook, Parler Tweeter Gab, and YouTube Are Un-Reliable News Sources
Ask The Blind Man ,He Saw it All
Source: HNewsWire ZeroHedge HNewsWire ZeroHedge
StevieRay Hansen
Editor, HNewsWire.com
I’ve been told by friends that have taken the shots they do so because they want to protect themselves from SARS-CoV-2 or want to prevent infecting others. The gaslighting, fear mongering and disinformation they have been fed has led them to shut down their common sense and believe an illusion.
The shots will neither prevent them from being infected or prevent them from being carriers and infecting others.
“These protocols do not emphasize the most important ramifications of Covid-19 that people are most interested in preventing: overall infection, hospitalization, and death. It boggles the mind and defies common sense that the National Institute of Health, the Center for Disease Control, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, and the rest would consider the approval of a vaccine that would be distributed to hundreds of millions on such slender threads of success.” writes William A. Haseltine.