FDA Continues Its March To Inoculate Children With Experimental COVID-19 “Vaccines”.

On April 29, US drug authorities hinted that COVID-19 vaccinations for young children might be approved in June.

The FDA has announced that its expert advisory group, the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), will meet to discuss revisions to the Moderna and Pfizer emergency use authorizations (EUAs).

Pfizer is still waiting on clinical trial data after its two-shot primary regimen failed to trigger an adequate immune response in children aged 6 months to 4 years old. Moderna announced Thursday that it submitted an EUA for children aged 6 months to 5 years old; Pfizer is still waiting on clinical trial data after its two-shot primary regimen failed to trigger an adequate immune response in children aged 6 months to 4 years old.

The sessions will be held on June 8, 21, and 22 at the FDA.

In a response to The Epoch Times, an FDA representative said that for instances in which the VRBPAC is consulted, the FDA normally waits until after hearing from the panel before approving or denying the applications.

In the past, the FDA has authorized vaccinations within days after meeting with the committee.

Dr. Peter Marks, head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, told the Washington Post that “we would expect June authorizations for one or more of the pediatric immunizations” if the evidence is satisfactory.

Despite the little danger COVID-19 poses to many children, no children under the age of five may now receive a COVID-19 vaccination, which frustrates several parents and healthcare professionals.

Moderna’s experiment, on the other hand, yielded ineffective results, causing many specialists to state that the results do not support authorisation.

The FDA was set to meet with VRBPAC in February to discuss Pfizer’s vaccination for young children, but the meeting was unexpectedly postponed just days before it was to take place.

“The data that we saw made us understand that we needed to see data from a third dosage, as in the current study, in order to make the conclusion that we could proceed with doing an authorization,” Marks said at the time during a conference call with reporters.

Dr. Scott Gottlieb, a former FDA commissioner who now serves on Pfizer’s board of directors, later said that the delay was due to a low number of COVID-19 patients in both study arms.

After receiving COVID-19, which is produced by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, children are considerably less likely to have any symptoms and to develop serious sickness.

The FDA said it “understands the urgency to authorize a vaccine for age groups who are not currently eligible for vaccination and will work diligently to complete our evaluation of the data,” presumably in response to Dr. Anthony Fauci, the White House medical adviser, who recently suggested that regulators might wait to look at the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines together to avoid creating confusion among parents.

“Should any of the submissions be submitted on time and the data indicate a clear way forward following our examination,” the FDA added.

Those in favor of these tyrannical measures in places like America are only troubled by our position because they never knew the freedom they’ve given up. They haven’t observed the privileges given to them bought and paid for with blood sweat and tears. They seem to think humanity can operate without the people they loathe. Such shortsightedness is sure to progress into something much more problematic in the coming years. These are actions planned and executed, with the intention of dividing the public. These people enacting laws with the sole purpose of moving toward inoculating children with an experimental MRNA vaccination is egregious, and won’t be tolerated by freedom loving citizens. Children belong to their parents, not the community. Because the “community” has proven to be unfit to aid the upbringing of a child. Children brought up in the early 90’s and prior experienced life as it were. Organic and not digitized. Think of how far we’ve come, and how sinister this agenda feels when you see the legislation coming down the pipe.

These vaccines will be pushed onto America heavily by the UN and other globalist organizations once the two tier system is set in place. Nothing that these tyrants can say or do will convince self aware Christians to relinquish their faith in Christ. 1 Peter 4:12-14 says: “Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery trial when it comes upon you to test you, as though something strange were happening to you. But rejoice insofar as you share Christ’s sufferings, that you may also rejoice and be glad when his glory is revealed. If you are insulted for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you.” Please stay inquisitive the word of God, and the world around you.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the White House chief medical advisor, claimed Chinese officials were “very discreet” about the COVID-19 pandemic’s suspected origins, though he stopped short of accusing Beijing of concealing it up.

On BBC’s “Sunday Morning” program on March 27, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease was asked about World Health Organization (WHO) investigators’ claims that China prevented them from “seeing key details and speaking to key people” when they were investigating the pandemic origins in Wuhan in early 2021.

Fauci responded, “You know, I don’t want to create any or make any negative statements about that.”

“However, the Chinese are very closed, almost reluctant, especially when a disease develops in their nation; they become exceedingly private, even when there is no cause to be hidden,” he stated.

Fauci then speculated that the Chinese regime’s embarrassment by worldwide reactions may have prompted them to be less than transparent about COVID-19’s origins and distribution.

“I believe they were concerned and perhaps embarrassed that the virus originated in their country, but that’s not a problem,” he said.

“As a result, when they see anything happening in their own nation, they have a natural reflex of not covering things up, but also not being particularly open and upfront.”

In the midst of continuing investigations to determine the source of the pandemic, US officials and others have repeatedly criticized Beijing for limiting access to vital data and facilities.

Furthermore, during the early phases of the initial outbreak in Wuhan, the Chinese dictatorship suppressed information about the severity and spread of the disease, allowing the virus to spread around the world while the world was still uninformed of the new coronavirus’s risks.

Many MPs and academics have accused the communist leadership of concealing both the pandemic’s roots and the outbreak’s initial spread.

The question of whether the virus spilled from a Wuhan laboratory or spread naturally before infecting humans is at the center of the outbreak’s origins discussion. While both ideas have supporters, the Chinese regime’s refusal to allow independent observation of the lab makes a thorough investigation extremely difficult.

Fauci admitted that he was “never positive” when it came to determining when and where COVID-19 began in the early days, but that the parallels he noticed between Covid-19 and prior viruses like SARS CoV-1 in the millennium suggested a likely origin for the present pandemic.

“I, like many other virologists, said that the most plausible cause was a jumping species from animal to human,” Fauci added.

Fauci went on to say that the existence of a research laboratory in Wuhan does not bother him, and that it has no bearing on his opinion of the Chinese regime’s actions in the matter.

“It’s hardly surprising that a research lab is located there. “The Chinese were attempting to figure out what the original etiology of SARS CoV-1 was, and they did figure it out,” he said, alluding to the SARS virus that spread from China from 2002 to 2003. Scientists eventually traced the virus back to horseshoe bats in China’s Yunnan province, where it propagated through Asian civets before reaching humans.

“[The SARS outbreak] made it very evident that there was a chance we’d have another pandemic outbreak from the animal-human interface,” Fauci said. “It seems sense that the Chinese would be examining this to see how you could prevent another outbreak.”

According to emails released earlier this year, Fauci not only launched efforts to conceal evidence pointing to a lab origin for COVID-19, but also actively influenced a highly influential academic study that ruled out the idea of a lab leak.

Despite Dr. Anthony Fauci’s claims to ignorance, he was notified in a private teleconference that the CCP virus had most certainly leaked from a Chinese laboratory, yet he continued to promote the alternative narrative that it had spontaneously emerged, according to new evidence.

The director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Anthony Fauci, may have initiated efforts to cover up evidence pointing to a laboratory leak as the source of the CCP virus, according to redacted emails recently made public.

Evidence reveals that Fauci swayed a highly influential academic study that was initially published on February 16, 2020, before being published in the prestigious science publication Nature, which ruled out such a possibility.

Five virologists collaborated on the research article, titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” four of whom joined Fauci on a teleconference on Feb. 1, 2020.

At least three of the paper’s authors indicated during the phone conference that they were “60 to 80% convinced” that the CCP virus came from a lab, a point they repeated in emails following the call.

Public claims of a possible relationship between the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China and the CCP virus outbreak surfaced at the time, but Fauci and other medical professionals disregarded these reports as conspiracy theories.

This includes Peter Daszak, founder of EcoHealth Alliance, the nonprofit that funneled United States grant money to scientists in Wuhan and the other authors, who published a statement that read, “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”

In an interview with EpochTV’s “Crossroads” program, Jeff Carlson and Hans Mahncke, hosts of “Truth Over News,” argued that the latest data suggests that Fauci was fully aware that the CCP virus had likely leaked from the Wuhan lab in China, but deliberately pushed a different narrative.

“Proximal origin takes the firm side of the natural origin for the virus. And it’s been used by the media and by the government to debunk any talk of a lab leak. As a matter of fact, that’s what was used to push back on anybody saying anything like that was the established science,” Carlson added.

“Well, the first version of proximal origin was finished on the very same day as the teleconference. So just sort of let that sink in, at the time that Fauci and Collins [National Institutes of Health head Francis Collins] and Farrar [Jeremy Farrar, the head of the UK’s Wellcome Trust], the senior funding, the heads of our health institutions are being told privately that it’s anywhere in the range of 60 to 80 percent likely that this virus has a lab origin, they complete the first draft of proximal origin, which is later used to promote a narrative of a natural origin as opposed to a lab leak origin for the virus,” Said Carlson.

Despite evidence to the contrary, Carlson and Mahncke claimed that Fauci went public with the assertion that he was uninformed of the claims being made by academics attending the teleconference.

“What’s new about these emails are the details that have come out through these unredacted emails. Before when there was that email dump, all the emails were basically redacted 95 percent or so or just gray, gray, gray… so now we know what’s behind those redactions, some of them, and what we found out is the level of detail that the scientists already knew at the time about the engineered features of the virus,” Said Mahncke.

“So all the stuff that we’ve found out in the past two years, they knew all that on Feb. 1, 2020 … and instead of alerting the world to the fact that there’s an engineered virus that’s hitting the world, Fauci does the exact opposite. He goes out there and says, ‘No, this is all natural,’” Mahncke stated.

Fauci was requested to help create a response letter to the Trump White House’s query about the virus’s origins at a meeting of the National Academy of Sciences on Feb. 3, just two days after the teleconference with the authors of “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2.” In which he reiterated his belief that the CCP virus emerged naturally rather than from a laboratory.

“So right from the start, Fauci is pushing really hard and in various forums, all in the same direction, natural, natural, natural,” Mahncke said. “But at the same time, he was told not only that it’s very likely that it came out of the lab, but he was told the details; that to me is very fascinating.”

Fauci denied having interacted with the authors when asked explicitly during his testimony before Congress earlier this month.

Although data gathered by US intelligence agencies and other experts suggests that the CCP virus developed in a lab, other officials argue that it has a natural origin.

EcoHealth Alliance utilized government money to fund research on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, according to records obtained by The Intercept in connection with a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the publication against the National Institutes of Health.

We live in a peculiar time, in which people will blindly disregard logical explanations for catastrophes such as this one. Additional context and a wider perspective of global politics is needed to make sense of the bold claims we make about these disgusting people. But to defend the credibility of these people while disregarding a logical explanation for the origin of this virus, displays an irrefutable lack of longing for the truth. It would be unwise to go about your life assuming that nobody seeks to see you suffer. Evil exists, and you don’t deter it by ignoring every sign brought to your attention.

The internet has proved to be a place in which you can tune into various frequencies in search of a perspective that best fits your narrative. I could make up an argument on the fly and back it up with facts pertaining to my argument. With that being said, the news about COVID-19 is terrifyingly polarizing. There is a spectrum, by which all narratives of the COVID-19 agenda are carefully presented to anyone conducting research. The opposing sides of the spectrum are those who are sold on the COVID-19 pandemic, and those who aren’t sold at all.

But it becomes extremely important that we listen to our gut, when we notice that someone is eyeballing something that rightfully belongs to you. Our civil liberties are merely gods gift to man interpreted by men of power. No man, woman, government, organization, forum, or anything will prosper as a weapon against God. With that being said, when our God given rights are at stake, it is probably best to question the integrity of those who propose the removal of such rights. In summary, if you’re not a “conspiracy theorist” you probably aren’t asking very many questions about the world around you.

My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.

Hosea 4:6