NIH ‘Conflict Of Interest’ Identified By Acting NIH Director Via “Royalty Payments”.

Dr. Anthony Fauci and hundreds of National Institutes of Health (NIH) scientists have received undisclosed royalty payments totaling $350 million from pharmaceutical and other companies, according to the interim head of the agency.

Dr. Lawrence Tabak, who took over as NIH Director when the agency’s long-time head, Dr. Francis Collins, resigned in December 2021, told a House Appropriations Committee subcommittee that royalty payments are legal, but they don’t appear to be ethical.

“Right now, I think the NIH has a credibility problem, and this further feeds into that, and I’m only learning about this,” Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.) told Tabak. People in my district say things like, “Well, so-and-so has a financial interest, or they don’t like Ivermectin because they don’t get a royalty…”

“You may have very good scientific grounds for advocating a treatment or not, but the concept that individuals profit financially from specific studies and grants is to me the height of the appearance of a conflict of interest.”

In response, Tabak stated that the National Institutes of Health does not recommend specific drugs, but rather “supports the science that confirms whether an innovation is or is not efficacious, we don’t say this is good or this is terrible… I see how that may appear to be a conflict of interest.”

“Truthfully,” Moolenaar remarked, referring to Fauci, who was also testifying, “you’ve got directors of the National Institutes of Health stating some treatments are not good.”

According to Tabak, NIH comments are based on clinical trials that the agency supports.

“But if the agency is awarding who is the recipient of the grant, who is undertaking the trial, and there is somehow monies involved, that there is a financial gain that may be obtained if someone’s patent or idea is regarded validated,” Moolenaar questioned Tabak, puzzled.

Tabak proposed to Moolenaar that “maybe this is the type of issue that we can work together on so that we can explain to you the firewalls that we do have, because they are large and important,” after admitting that there appears to be a conflict of interest.

Fauci was mentioned by Moolenaar because he told the Associated Press in a 2005 piece, which was the first to bring the NIH royalties concerns to the public’s attention, that he had given his royalties to charity.

The issue faded from the news after 2005, and is only now resurfacing as a result of revelations first reported by The Epoch Times on May 9 that documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by a nonprofit government watchdog reveal an estimated $350 million in undisclosed royalty payments from pharmaceutical and other private firms to top NIH executives, as well as hundreds of the agency’s health scientists and researchers.

According to Open the Books, a charity that sued the NIH after it refused to answer its FOIA request for information, the $350 million in royalty payments were issued between 2010 and 2020.

According to Open the Books, Collins received 14 payments, Fauci received 23 payments, and his deputy, Clifford Lane, received eight payments.

The founder and president of Open the Books, Adam Andrzejewski, told The Epoch Times on Wednesday that NIH continues to suppress critical information concerning royalty payments, such as the identities of specific payers and the precise sums paid to individuals within NIH.

“With tens of billions of dollars in grant funding and tens of millions of dollars in royalties from third-party payors pouring back into NIH each year, the agency ought to come straight with the American people and open the books.” Andrzejewski stated, “We need to be able to follow the money.”

“We think that openness will transform American public policy.” There is no better example of this than payments made to NIH scientists by other parties (think pharmaceutical corporations). He went on to say that “any single outside payment to a government scientist might constitute a conflict of interest.”

Moolenaar and Tabak had a heated debate during a hearing on the Biden administration’s budget request for 2023.

“It’s no secret that the agency needs change,” said Rep. Neal Dunn (R-Fla.), who is also a surgeon, to The Epoch Times. The COVID-19 outbreak intensified and emphasized their many problems. A core obligation is to provide the public with clear access to how the NIH spends taxpayer monies and makes choices, and they must be held responsible. We must commit to modernizing our federal health agencies and restore America’s faith in public health now more than ever.”

The report states that “hundreds” of NIH scientists have been paid out by these royalties, totaling up to $350 million dollars. If 999 of these scientists split this money evenly, thats $350,000 each. But let’s try to be realistic here. Fauci likely takes a large cut considering he’s plastering his face across America spreading the biggest lies in history. So could we have found legitimate proof that Fauci and his constituents are conducting business in bad faith? Yes, but society is far too polarized to swallow this pill. If this information is correct, the left will be prompted to answer a few more uncomfortable questions about their willful ignorance.

This news will either blow over and we’ll watch the horror show continue, or we’ll wind up seeing this story everywhere; Conjuring a whole new type of problem. The globalists over at the WEF, and United Nations need the technocratic control over society due to their tyrannical and evil nature. But that can’t be achieved when society blows Fauci and his constituents out of the water. So what then is the contingency to this huge orchestrated plandemic? God only knows for sure, but you can count on it being a world shattering experience. We’ve got a long road ahead of us but through faith in Christ we can lead just and moral lives in the eyes of our creator. Matthew 7:13-14 says: ““Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few.” Stay inquisitive in the word of God, and the world around you.

Bill Gates, the former world’s wealthiest man, has proposed for a worldwide monitoring team coordinated by the World Health Organization (WHO) to detect pandemic risks.

More money is required to avert a future epidemic, according to the Microsoft co-founder, who spoke to the Financial Times over the weekend. At the same time, Gates stated that the WHO is the only body capable of carrying out such a mission.

As the turmoil in Ukraine dominates international policy, Gates emphasized that policymakers should not lose sight of COVID-19, a disease produced by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.

“It seems wild to me that we could fail to look at this tragedy and not, on behalf of the citizens of the world, make these investments,” Gates told the paper. “The amount of money involved is very small compared to the benefit and it will be a test: can global institutions take on new responsibilities in an excellent way, even in a time period where U.S.-China [relations are] tough, U.S.-Russia is extremely tough?” he also asked.

Gates went on to remark that at WHO, “less than 10 full-time individuals” are working on pandemic preparation because “those folks are preoccupied with numerous other things.”

“The present WHO financing is not at all serious about pandemics,” Gates said, referring to his upcoming book, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic.”

Since the beginning of the epidemic, Gates has emphasized the need of vaccinations. However, in February 2022, the billionaire claimed that the Omicron COVID-19 variation created a greater degree of natural immunity quicker than vaccinations.

“Unfortunately, the virus itself, particularly the form called omicron, is a sort of vaccine,” he stated at the time. “It generates both B-cell and T-cell immunity, and it’s done a greater job spreading out to the world population than vaccinations.” “That indicates that the risk of severe illness, which is mostly related with being elderly and having obesity or diabetes, is now drastically lowered as a result of that infection and exposure.”

Former President Donald Trump said in 2020 that the US will stop supporting WHO, claiming that the UN health agency had “failed in its basic responsibility and must be held responsible.” According to claims that WHO head Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus having a tight connection with the Chinese leadership, WHO pushed the CCP’s deception concerning COVID-19, which likely resulted in a larger epidemic than would have occurred otherwise.

Later, the WHO courted controversy when it blamed animals for the initial COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China, amid claims that the virus may have come from the city’s top-security bioresearch lab. The WHO’s decision was mostly based on the organization’s own investigative efforts in January and February 2021, despite criticism that the CCP played a part in the investigation.

Nobody with half a brain would begin to trust the WHO, Bill Gates, Fauci, or any of these globalists considering the fact that they made laughable attempts at setting aside the lab leak as a mere “theory”. You cannot tell half of the nation that their suspicions are incorrect and proceed to formulate plans that just happen to infringe on citizens God given rights. The global technocracy appears to be taking shape, beginning as a pandemic prevention framework. Once this digital infrastructure is erected, it only becomes easier to leverage the software to bend the rule of law.

No one man can make sense of this elaborate illusion cast over the common man of society, but collectively we can point out each limitation forced upon us and bring it forward as an injustice to the public. In Matthew 10:34 Jesus says: “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.” We’re meant to go down preaching the gospel and guiding others to salvation. This could be considered the bravest task a man or woman of faith could undertake, but make no mistake it will bear fruit in the kingdom of heaven. Stay inquisitive in the word of God, and the world around you.