China’s ‘Zero COVID’ Policy Under The Microscope By Ex-President Of Chinese Dept. Of Infectious Diseases.

On April 23, Miao Xiaohui, a well-known infectious disease expert in Shanghai, reiterated his call for the CCP to end the Zero-COVID policy, which he describes as “completely inconsistent with the basic law of infectious disease pandemics,” as soon as possible in order to reduce secondary disasters and deaths caused by excessive pandemic prevention.

Miao was the vice president and director of the Department of Infectious Diseases at Changzheng Hospital, which is linked with China’s Second Military Medical University, and he was involved in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the SARS outbreak that erupted in the country in 2003.

Miao argued in his essay that the Zero-COVID policy is ineffectual and lacks scientific support. He added that all neighborhoods in Shanghai have been shut for 23 to 27 days, which is “totally contradictory with the basic rules and intervention outcomes of infectious disease pandemics” and “exceeds the three longest incubation durations of the Omicron virus.”

Zero-COVID caused a slew of secondary tragedies, including fatalities that should not have happened. “Stop continuing, okay?” he pleaded.

Miao Xiaohui wrote a lengthy post on April 8 in which he claimed that under stringent regulations, the Zero-COVID policy would cause a rush on medical resources, and he demanded that the problem of increased fatalities during the pandemic be addressed and resolved quickly.

Based on a research on the increased mortality of some chronic noncommunicable disease patients (such as diabetics) during the lockdown of Wuhan, China in early 2020, Miao calculated that the one-month lockdown of Shanghai caused almost 1,000 additional diabetes fatalities.

He believes that, in addition to diabetes, various chronic non-communicable diseases, various acute and chronic infectious diseases, various acute diseases, and a 66 percent increase in suicide rates caused by psychological problems during the lockdown period, the additional death toll will not be insignificant.

According to Miao, during the current lockdown in Shanghai, at least 20 big hospitals were sealed for three days or more, with wards empty and operating rooms locked at the same time, artificially increasing the number of deaths.

He feels that the necessity for and expense of the authorities’ lockdown and clearing effort should be carefully addressed, particularly because a shortage of medical services during the lockdown might result in a high number of non-COVID-19 patients dying.

He advised that asymptomatic infected persons isolate at home, and that the government consider if it is essential to do nucleic acid testing on the whole community, as well as not allowing hospitals to close totally.

Finally, he brought up the possibility that nucleic acid testing, one of the three pillars of the CCP’s Zero-COVID policy, will lead to an increase in cross-infection. He explained, “Don’t ask me where the virus comes from; its hometown is in two cotton swabs.”

“Repeated nucleic acid testing, overburdened staff runs, and major cross-infection” are among the faults of the authorities’ Zero-COVID policy, according to Ding Xian, the former secretary of the Party Committee of Shanghai Huashan Hospital’s Jing’an Branch. “The most hazardous of them all is cross-contamination, and that science has been discarded.”

The statistical data had come out, and the number of positive cases would climb by 3 to 4% for each nucleic acid (test) of all workers, according to Yin Youkuan, the former deputy head of the Department of Infectious Diseases at Huashan Hospital in Shanghai, who posted on April 22.

He gave the example of a village in Shanghai. There were no positive cases at first, but the number grew to 83 after a few days of nucleic acid testing. “It was brought in by the personnel,” he explained.

Shanghai is now implementing “hard isolation” in the sealing and control regions, converting an entire residential building or neighborhood into an isolation site and attempting to increase the isolation area in order to achieve “social clearance.”

Ms. Xu, a resident of a community on Yangjing Street in Shanghai’s Pudong District, confirmed to The Epoch Times on April 25 that her community had been informed that beginning April 23, all of the buildings would be placed in “hard isolation,” which meant that residents’ only movement would be within their own apartments.

She informed reporters that the 25-story building where she lived had more than 200 homes, and that the lockdown began on March 21 when an elderly couple in their 90s tested positive via a nucleic acid test.

When it comes to secondary catastrophes during the lockdown, Ms. Xu says she is most concerned about being ill. Her granddaughter, who is in preschool, resides with her, while her son and daughter-in-law live in another residential complex that is also under lockdown.

Many hospitals have closed since Shanghai’s lockdown began, leaving inhabitants without access to essential medical services. Many people have died as a result of their inability to obtain prompt medical treatment. Some individuals in Shanghai have spontaneously calculated the number of persons who “did not die from COVID-19 but died as a result of COVID-19.” 

For example, on March 19, Yu Hongsan, a senior notary at the Shanghai Oriental Notary Public Office, died of an asthma attack when an ambulance was not sent quickly enough.

As the situation unfolds over time in China, we can begin to see whats happening a bit more clearly. The ‘Zero COVID’ policy is being used as an excuse to impose tyrannical human rights violations on Chinese citizens. The real risk of death among healthy individuals renders the coveted ‘Zero COVID’ policy useless in terms of moving forward and moving past this “pandemic”. The free press has been under attack in China, particularly Hong Kong since COVID first showed itself in Wuhan. Alongside citizens having their posts and associated comments removed from social media platforms because they don’t fit the narrative.

There is a correlation that can be made between the Chinese Communist Party and the Centers For Disease Control. And that is the CCP underreports its numbers to hide the fact that there is obvious falsification of statistics used solely as an excuse to exercise the incomprehensible power that they hold over their people. Not long ago there was civil unrest running rampant through China, conveniently enough ‘Zero COVID’ policy seems to have quieted down all dissidents. 

As far as the CDC goes, they have to play at a different game; By over-reporting COVID-19 contraction and death statistics, they’re able to coerce citizens into believing that the situation is much more dire than it actually is. Why you might ask? Because we live in a free democratic society that doesn’t require us to cater to our governments every whim. We’re being lied to, it’s as simple as that. Once you come to terms with it, you may have a shot at seeing the next steps being taken by Klaus Schwab and his many neo-communist constituents. Stay inquisitive in the word of God, and the world around you.

On April 29, US drug authorities hinted that COVID-19 vaccinations for young children might be approved in June.

The FDA has announced that its expert advisory group, the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), will meet to discuss revisions to the Moderna and Pfizer emergency use authorizations (EUAs).

Pfizer is still waiting on clinical trial data after its two-shot primary regimen failed to trigger an adequate immune response in children aged 6 months to 4 years old. Moderna announced Thursday that it submitted an EUA for children aged 6 months to 5 years old; Pfizer is still waiting on clinical trial data after its two-shot primary regimen failed to trigger an adequate immune response in children aged 6 months to 4 years old.

The sessions will be held on June 8, 21, and 22 at the FDA.

In a response to The Epoch Times, an FDA representative said that for instances in which the VRBPAC is consulted, the FDA normally waits until after hearing from the panel before approving or denying the applications.

In the past, the FDA has authorized vaccinations within days after meeting with the committee.

Dr. Peter Marks, head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, told the Washington Post that “we would expect June authorizations for one or more of the pediatric immunizations” if the evidence is satisfactory.

Despite the little danger COVID-19 poses to many children, no children under the age of five may now receive a COVID-19 vaccination, which frustrates several parents and healthcare professionals.

Moderna’s experiment, on the other hand, yielded ineffective results, causing many specialists to state that the results do not support authorisation.

The FDA was set to meet with VRBPAC in February to discuss Pfizer’s vaccination for young children, but the meeting was unexpectedly postponed just days before it was to take place.

“The data that we saw made us understand that we needed to see data from a third dosage, as in the current study, in order to make the conclusion that we could proceed with doing an authorization,” Marks said at the time during a conference call with reporters.

Dr. Scott Gottlieb, a former FDA commissioner who now serves on Pfizer’s board of directors, later said that the delay was due to a low number of COVID-19 patients in both study arms.

After receiving COVID-19, which is produced by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, children are considerably less likely to have any symptoms and to develop serious sickness.

The FDA said it “understands the urgency to authorize a vaccine for age groups who are not currently eligible for vaccination and will work diligently to complete our evaluation of the data,” presumably in response to Dr. Anthony Fauci, the White House medical adviser, who recently suggested that regulators might wait to look at the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines together to avoid creating confusion among parents.

“Should any of the submissions be submitted on time and the data indicate a clear way forward following our examination,” the FDA added.

Those in favor of these tyrannical measures in places like America are only troubled by our position because they never knew the freedom they’ve given up. They haven’t observed the privileges given to them bought and paid for with blood sweat and tears. They seem to think humanity can operate without the people they loathe. Such shortsightedness is sure to progress into something much more problematic in the coming years. These are actions planned and executed, with the intention of dividing the public. These people enacting laws with the sole purpose of moving toward inoculating children with an experimental MRNA vaccination is egregious, and won’t be tolerated by freedom loving citizens. Children belong to their parents, not the community. Because the “community” has proven to be unfit to aid the upbringing of a child. Children brought up in the early 90’s and prior experienced life as it were. Organic and not digitized. Think of how far we’ve come, and how sinister this agenda feels when you see the legislation coming down the pipe.

These vaccines will be pushed onto America heavily by the UN and other globalist organizations once the two tier system is set in place. Nothing that these tyrants can say or do will convince self aware Christians to relinquish their faith in Christ. 1 Peter 4:12-14 says: “Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery trial when it comes upon you to test you, as though something strange were happening to you. But rejoice insofar as you share Christ’s sufferings, that you may also rejoice and be glad when his glory is revealed. If you are insulted for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you.” Please stay inquisitive the word of God, and the world around you.