Americans Could Get Sick, While 1.7 Million Could Die…
The Coronavirus Was Most Certainly Produced by Crazy (Un-Godly) Men in Laboratories, the CDC and WHO Knew All Along That the Coronavirus Was a Bioweapon, There’re in Charge?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says up to 214 million Americans could get sick, while 1.7 million could die if the current status of the coronavirus pandemic continues to worsen.
The CDC made the announcement during a closed-door meeting held last month among CDC officials and dozens of health experts and epidemiologists from around the world, according to the New York Times, which first broke the story.
During the meeting, one of the CDC’s leading epidemiologists presented four scenarios that showed the possible trajectories the virus could take, as well as the effects of its spread throughout the United States.
For the absolute worst-case scenario, the CDC said between 160 million and 214 million people would get sick with COVID-19, the deadly illness caused by the Wuhan coronavirus which, after originating in China, has since spread to other parts of the world.
According to the CDC, in their projection, even if interventions such as drive-thru testing and barring visitors from nursing homes were to be started immediately, as many as three million Americans might still fall ill.
‘We’re being very, very careful to make sure we have scientifically valid modeling that’s drawing properly on the epidemic and what’s known about the virus,’ Ira Longini, one the epidemic experts present during the meeting, said.
“You can’t win. If you overdo it, you panic everybody. If you under-do it, they get complacent. You have to be careful,” she added.
In the four different scenarios, each person who is diagnosed with the coronavirus is assumed to infect two to three people. According to the CDC, the hospitalization rate is either three percent or 12 percent; and either .25 percent or one percent of all infected people will die. (Related: Coronavirus ravages North America: More US states report upswing in cases; even Canadian PM’s wife tests positive)
For the CDC’s worst-case scenario, as many as 21 million people were hospitalized, and up to 1.7 million people died.
The hospitalization scenario according to experts, can derail the American healthcare system, especially since data provided by the American Hospital Association shows that the United States only has a little more than 924,000 staffed beds in its hospitals, of which fewer than a tenth are for people who are considered to be critically ill.
In addition, the CDC said during their presentation that the infections—which the World Health Organization (WHO) has declared to be a global pandemic—could last months or even over a year. According to the CDC, infections in the United States could be concentrated in shorter periods and staggered across time in different communities.
According to officials, the outbreak’s trajectory, while dependent on decisive action from medical authorities and the government, also depends on the behavior of the general public and how well they follow rules and protocols.
“When people change their behavior, those model parameters are no longer applicable,” Lauren Gardner, an epidemic expert at Johns Hopkins, said in an interview with the New York Times.
Among the recommended policies and measures that can be taken by authorities and the public to help prevent further coronavirus infections is the implementation of work-from-home schemes for employees, the banning of mass gatherings and the imposition of travel restrictions.
Other official recommendations include the frequent washing of hands, cleaning and disinfecting surroundings, and the self-quarantining of individuals if they get sick.
As of this writing, more than 144,824 people around the world have been infected by the virus, and more than 5,398 people have died.
the projected fatalities vs. the actual fatalities from March 6th through March 16th.
This shows deaths from the coronavirus in the USA:
As you can see, the model is tracking remarkably well with the fatalities we’re seeing in real-time. And this was all pre-published on March 6th.
Here’s how the map of infections looks for America right now:
Where do these numbers take us? Well, absent any strong social distancing, they would have taken us to millions of deaths in the USA by July. Although that scenario is now obsolete, it’s important to look at where we were originally headed, according to the first model:
By April 4th, 2020, if no travel restrictions are put in place:
- 8,645 actively infected and transmitting on this day
- 580 cumulative dead since day one, with 58 deaths on this day
- 5,432 cumulative recovered since day one
By May 4th, 2020, if no travel restrictions are put in place:
- 122,529 actively infected and transmitting on this day
- 10,432 cumulative dead since day one, with 910 deaths on this day
- 85,332 cumulative recovered since day one
By June 4th, 2020, if no travel restrictions are put in place:
- 1.7 million actively infected and transmitting on this day
- 153,000 cumulative dead since day one, with 12,960 deaths on this day
- 1.2 million cumulative recovered since day one
By July 4th, 2020, if no travel restrictions are put in place:
- 24.3 million actively infected and transmitting on this day
- 2.16 million cumulative dead since day one, with 183,000 deaths on this day
- 17.1 million cumulative recovered since day one
What’s concerning to me is that we are still tracking with this model in terms of the number of people dying each day. What we hope to see is divergence away from the model so that infections and deaths are lower.
That will happen within 3-4 weeks, most likely, as the strong social distancing measures put into place over the last few days start to kick in.
Conservative pundits and publishers are in a state of total denial
Sadly, many conservative publishers and Trump supporters are all now in a state of total denial about the coronavirus, calling it a “hoax” or “sham.” So they are teaching their followers to be complacent and unprepared. This will only cause the coronavirus wave to last longer and kill more people, most like killing more Trump supporters themselves.
So right now we are watching conservative publishers and pundits in America transform into a kind of pro-Trump suicide cult characterized by bad math and scientific illiteracy.
Fortunately, Trump is now taking this seriously, even if many of his followers aren’t.
Because of the widespread scientific illiteracy among many prominent conservatives, we are now facing a situation where their inability to do basic math is placing the entire conservative movement at risk of mass casualties, since dead people only vote when they’re Democrats, of course.
We each need to do our part to endure a “lockdown” to stop this coronavirus from killing millions. I’m willing to do my part, but many conservatives are not. Listen to this podcast to learn more:
“Chinese virus” CDC, chaos, China, Collapse, coronavirus, coronavirus tests, covid-19, deaths, disaster, Flu, government, infections, outbreak, pandemic, State of Emergency, superbugs, virus
Coronavirus (“Chinese virus”) kills the oldest and has no respect for authority
Many of the most powerful people in the world are old, and coronavirus does not discriminate based on social status. Deaths are now hitting at high levels (not of death but of status), which can change the political conflicts of our world:
Now a global pestilence has erupted, and in Luke 21 we were specifically warned to watch for “pestilences” in the last days.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Have NOT Got The Memo Yet, “Pestilences” Has No Cure
If a mandatory vaccination program were to be implemented again in the U.S. for (“Chinese virus”) COVID-19, the government would have to reassure the public its previous negligence of such side effects would not be repeated, an unlikely scenario after the corporate breach of trust exposed on Wall Street in recent years involving large pharmaceutical firms. Regardless, Big Pharma is already partnering with the U.S. Army to develop a vaccine for the coronavirus which would have to be tested and evaluated before licensing by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended for use by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), both of which partner with the WHO whose largest financial contributor is the U.S. government.
One of the WHO’s other largest benefactors is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation with whom it has a partnership on vaccinations. The billionaire Microsoft Corporation founder has used his enormous wealth to dodge paying taxes under the guise of philanthropy and his ‘charitable’ private ventures have mostly focused on producing vaccines for developing countries and purportedly tackling global poverty, especially in Africa. On the surface, this may appear to be benevolent work, but like many so-called altruistic projects, it is a scheme which allows ultra-wealthy plutocrats like Gates to influence global policy and obtain political power with no accountability by investing in “fixing” the social problems caused by the very system which made them rich, with the expansion of neoliberalism as their real agenda. The consequences of this can be seen with charitable projects involving Gates in the Congo which forced its local agribusiness into using GMO seeds which only benefited private companies like Monsanto.
More disturbing is that in regard to environmental concerns about man-made climate change, Gates has made public his views on curbing human population growth as a solution. At a 2010 TED Conference, Gates stated:
“First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”
To put it another way, one of the world’s wealthiest men admitted in public he believes vaccines should be used for depopulation, just as he is financially investing in both developing and delivering them to countries in the global south. The misanthropic myth of ‘overpopulation’ pushed by Gates and the elite not only suggests that depopulation is a solution for slowing the warming of the climate but retains the logic of an essential component of eugenics with the implicit idea that the quality of life for the human species can be improved by discouraging human reproduction. Since developing countries have the highest child mortality rates, families are more likely to be larger because children are less likely to survive. Hence, the inherent racism and classism in such a misconception.
Given that the vast majority of carbon emissions are produced by a shortlist of fossil fuel companies and the world’s largest polluter is the U.S. military, promoting this dangerous fallacy is the perfect way for the ruling elite to shift the responsibility for climate change onto the world’s poor. Unfortunately, this dangerous falsehood has been popularized in the mainstream environmental movement and pseudo-left with examples such as BirthStrike, a group of mostly female activists protesting the lack of regulations on the ecological crisis by refusing to bear children that has been irresponsibly endorsed by popular “progressive” politicians such as U.S. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). ‘AOC’ is also the face of the Democratic Party’s Green New Deal which has troubling ties to the United Nations Agenda 21 sustainable development program that calls for “achieving a more sustainable population.”
The false notion of “overpopulation” became a misguided cornerstone of the modern-day environmental movement thanks to the publication of German scientist Paul Ehrlich’s best-selling book The Population Bomb in 1968, an alarmist diatribe that has in the years since become famous for its inaccurate doomsday predictions as a result of the mistaken belief which never came to fruition. Today’s doom merchants regarding the climate, no doubt a serious issue, are in many respects channeling Ehrlich’s false prophecies which are considered a modern rehash of the influential 18th-century British economist and philosopher, Thomas Malthus. No single scholar was more loathed by Karl Marx and the working-class movement than Malthus, whose pseudo-scientific theories about demography were thought to have been intellectually defeated until they found new life in Ehrlich’s eco-fascism. As much as today’s ‘population bombers’ like Bill Gates may shun the more explicitly racist Malthusian ideas that the global north should contain the population of developing countries, they still tacitly endorse them by arguing that the size of the population itself is a source a poverty and climate change.
Bill Gates has cited business tycoon John D. Rockefeller, the richest man in American history who had an even greater monopoly on the oil business as Gates had at one time on the computer industry, as an inspiration in using his wealth to invest in medical research as a focus of his philanthropy. However, Gates has something else in common with the Rockefeller family in his views on population, as the Rockefeller Foundation was the single largest donor to the American eugenics movement in the 1920s and 30s and helped establish its German branch, even subsidizing the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics that Nazi physician Josef Mengele worked in prior to his wartime experiments. Despite the fact that a line can be traced from the American eugenics movement to the Nazi regime’s programs, which Nuremberg defendants even tried to use as justification for their atrocities in court, Rockefeller’s grandson John Rockefeller III continued the family legacy of interest in demography with the founding of the Population Council NGO which conducts research in “reproductive health” (sterilization) in developing countries. The Nazi government was also the first to ever pass legislation safeguarding the environment which they equated with German national identity, another unexpected intersection between brown and green politics.
In an astonishing coincidence, the Gates Foundation hosted an event just last October with the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the World Economic Forum called Event 201, a pandemic simulation that gathered elite figures in government, business and health experts to plan for the possibility of a worldwide outbreak. Gates himself has warned of pandemics for years and ominously wrote that the world should “prepare for epidemics the way the military prepares for war.” The Event 201 fictional scenario just so happened to be a coronavirus called CAPS from Brazilian pigs which infected people globally and after a year and a half in the exercise caused tens of millions of deaths and set off a worldwide financial crash. Since the outset of the real COVID-19 coronavirus, Gates himself has stepped down from Microsoft to focus on his philanthropy while his foundation is busy working on a vaccine.
Many have observed that some characteristics of COVID-19 bear a resemblance to HIV that could not have happened organically. The recent documentary Cold Case Hammarskjöld, which won an award at last year’s Sundance film festival, puts forth a chilling theory that a South African white supremacist organization deliberately spread HIV/AIDS among black Africans through vaccines in previous decades. The film begins as an investigation of the mysterious plane crash in Northern Rhodesia which killed Swedish diplomat and United Nations Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjöld in 1961. In 1998, a document authored by a shadowy paramilitary organization called the South African Institute for Maritime Research (SAIMR) was uncovered by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission justice assembly in post-apartheid South Africa which indicated that Hammarskjöld was the victim of an assassination. Not only do the filmmakers discover in their inquiry the distinct likelihood that the plane was shot down by a Belgian mercenary employed by SAIMR which was operating under orders from MI6 and the CIA, but the more stunning revelation is a recorded confession from a former SAIMR soldier to having deliberately spread HIV/AIDS to black Africans through immunization. If what is claimed about SAIMR is true and that they were connected with Western intelligence, that the COVID-19 virus could be something deliberately spread is not outside the realm of possibility.
Maybe it will prove to be the case that the yellow press’s version of the coronavirus beginning with the zoonotic transfer of the disease after the consumption of a pangolin or wild bat by a ‘patient zero’ in Wuhan is accurate. Nevertheless, the pandemic should be a chilling reminder of the elite’s eco-fascist agenda and the continuous danger that the military-industrial complex puts the world’s population is by continuing to conduct dangerous research into deadly pathogens where the risk vastly outweighs the benefits. If the outbreak has led many to be suspicious of the official story, it is exactly because of the history of U.S. biological warfare and the elite’s potentially genocidal and pessimistic worldview that the only way to prevent the demise of humanity is by thinning the herd.
The number of Orphans aging out of Child Protective Custody has grown at an alarming rate. The 127 Faith Foundation receives many requests each week to house them at our ranch. Our prayer is that the good people of our country will step up to the challenge and offer financial support for "the least among us." We need your help! StevieRay Hansen, Founder, The 127 Faith Foundation
Would Be Preceded by Several Things Many False Christs Would Come, Deceiving Many; We Would “Hear of Wars and Rumors of Wars… Those interested in…Read More