Parents who accept this LGBTQ “ideology” and “agenda” then corrupt their own children by taking them to “Drag Queen Story Hour”
My job is protecting children. It has taken me from big cities to rural outposts, from ghettos to penthouses, and from courtrooms,into demonic battlefields. But whatever the venue, the truth remains constant: Some humans intentionally hurt children. They commit unspeakable acts—for their pleasure, their profit, or both. StevieRay Hansen
What verse from the Bible says “love the sinner hate the sin”? that phrase does not exist in the Bible, if you’re going to claim a position, get your facts right….
Jesus told the woman caught in adultery to “go and sin no more”. And LGBTQ Trans People accuse me of cherry picking the Bible.
You also need to read Psalm 5:5. God does not love the rebel sinner. He is holy and He has a righteous and just wrath against sinners while they are in their sin.
And if you throw out the Old Testament (LGBTQ People) you don’t know God or His truth. God gave us the entirety of the Bible, not just the parts you want to twist to justify sin.
By the grace of God I call out to sinners to repent and turn to Jesus Christ and that is loving your neighbor. This life is about God’s glory not man chasing after sin.
The Queen James Bible (QJV), also called the “Gay Bible,” is an edit of the biblical text done in the name of preventing “homophobic interpretations.” To accomplish this goal, the publishers printed a Bible in which all negative references to homosexuality have been removed. The Queen James Bible was published in 2012 and is based on the 1769 edition of the King James Bible.
The publishers of the Queen James Bible chose the name “Queen James” as an obvious take-off on the “King James” Version, as the Authorized Version of 1611 is commonly called. The publishers of the Homosexual Bible also claim that King James was bisexual, so their choice of title capitalizes on the slang meaning of the term queen.
No longer can constitutionalists, Christians, and conservatives sit back in silence. This continuing forward moving “revolution” has to be countered and put back where it belongs. 4.5 percent of the population is attempting to dictate to the rest of the US population that their “lifestyle” and “gender choice” is as normal as heterosexuality and the fact there are only two genders – male and female. Not subscribing to their mental illness labels one as “transprejudice” needing re-education. Is anyone else picturing the re-education camps of Nazi Germany and the former USSR?
Shopping For Fake Pediatric Penises
The website 4th Wave Now, for parents who are concerned about “the medicalization of gender-atypical youth,” is a great source of alternative news, scientific and otherwise. It’s not an anti-trans website per se, but rather focuses on the transgender phenomenon among kids and minors.
If you follow 4th Wave Now, either on the site itself or on its must-follow Twitter account, it’s like a doorway into some bizarre alternative universe. All this gender-nonconforming happy-clappy stuff that gets puffed in the mainstream media does not remotely tell the full story.
Via 4WN, here’s a 2015 “parenting” story from an Australian newspaper, about how far parents of trans children will go to accommodate their kids. Note well that this is a story pitched in praise of these parents going the extra mile. Get this:
Every day, 11-year-old Jake* runs to the letterbox to check if the postman has been. For four weeks he’s been waiting for a parcel that seems as if it will never come.
Of course these days you can order anything online, but this isn’t like any other purchase his mum, Ellie, has ever made.
“It appears perhaps that our order has been held up in customs,” Ellie says. “That’s something else that just makes me aware of how weird and how covert this could seem to others.”
Even though Ellie desperately wants to help her son, she is the first to admit that it has been an emotional and mental challenge to “try to imagine what it may be like to need this so much.”
What does this 11-year-old female need so much that she obsessively checks the mailbox? Why might it seem “weird”? Read on:
The second type of item in the parcel will be a soft, washable “packer,” that gets sewn into underwear to create the outward appearance of male genitalia.
“It’s desperately important for him in order to feel comfortable and pass [as a boy] all the time,” Ellie says.
That’s right: a fake penis for this 11-year-old girl to put in her pants. More:
This issue does have a lighthearted side, though. Reflecting on her search to find her son appropriate products, Ellie describes her situation as “tragicomic.”
“I’m an adult, married heterosexual woman who doesn’t have a child with a penis,” she says, “I don’t really know what children’s penises look like and yet I’ve had really explicit conversations with strangers about children’s penises.”
A “lighthearted” side? Yeah, there’s nothing that brings about a chuckle more than considering the confusion of a mom searching for a child-sized fake wang for her daughter.
4WN looked into TranZwear, a company that has an, um, pediatric division marketing to trans children. From the TranZwear website, here’s a description of a tiny silicone penis and testicles for your preschooler: the “Extra Small Newt-silicone packer” (a “packer” is the fake This is a screenshot from the order page — which, you are warned for NSFW purposes, has a visual depiction of the silicone teeny weenie.
Here’s the “Best Boy Bump” for even smaller female children who want to present as males (also NSFW):
Understand: this company sells dildos for little girls who want to appear to be boys, and the Australian newspaper wrote about this as a wonderful service.
Why do I bring up this 2015 story now? Because 4th Wave Now re-upped it as a reminder of what people will accept as normal and even good. The group said they were sure that highlighting a San Francisco company that sells fake penises to four-year-old girls would be a story that woke people up to how depraved and deviant this stuff can be. But no. As 4WN tweeted yesterday:
When it comes to transition, nothing is ever too much. No bridge is too far. Above all, it speaks to the success of the Suicide or Transition doctrine spread by gender clinicians around the world–but particularly in the US, Ground Zero for “affirmative care.”441:24 PM – Jan 3, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacySee 4thWaveNow’s other Tweets
As far as I can tell, The New York Times has not yet written a puff piece on pediatric penis packers, but give them time. This is a headline from an October 22, 2018 piece:
When the Times does get around to doing the piece, it will be to valorize manufacturers of prosthetic tot todgers as Saving Our Precious Children From Suicide, and to demonize people who object (if they are acknowledged at all) as haters. You’ll see.
When your little girl comes home from Drag Queen Story Hour with ideas about exploring her own gender identity, take comfort in knowing that retailers are there to meet all your family’s fake pediatric penis needs.
UPDATE: Regular readers will not be surprised by the handles of the people in the comments thread who defend this stuff, but the arguments they use are worth noting. So far, we have:
1. This is extreme and no big deal.
2. It’s capitalism’s fault.
3. What adults do is worse.
4. People who object to this are hypocrites.
5. Those parents are exercising their right to do what’s best for their kid, just like the rest of us.
6. A prosthesis is not the same thing as a dildo.
7. “I don’t see what my neighbor’s gay marriage has to do with me” (recycled from 2004; replace “neighbor’s gay marriage” with “neighbor’s pre-schooler daughter’s silicone penis”).
8. I don’t see this in my daily life, so it must not be real.
UPDATE.2: Hey deniers, just ignore the fact that a Democratic US Congresswoman flew the transgender pride flag outside her office. I guess that didn’t happen, given how this is extreme, no big deal, and we don’t see this in our daily life, so it must not be a real thing. Also, prostheses aren’t dildos, so if the Democratic Congresswoman affixes a prosthetic penis to the door of her office in solidarity with pre-pubescent FtM trans children, don’t you hypocritical Republicans DARE call it a dildo.
UPDATE.3: Why should MtF trans little boys be left out? Here’s “Tuck Buddies”: underwear that allows a boy who thinks he’s a girl to hide his junk:
The Government Tilt How Crony Capitalism Distorts Markets Part 500:59/00:5900:00 Next Video The Government Tilt How Crony Capitalism Distorts Markets Part 501:00×Posted in LGBT, Weimar America. Tagged transgender, 4th Wave Now, packers, pediatric penises. Source
The editors of the Queen James Bible, who chose to be anonymous, claim that there was no reference to homosexuality in any Bible translation prior to the 1946 Revised Standard Version. Then, they assert, “anti-LGBT Bible interpretations” arose, based on a faulty translation in the RSV of eight verses.
The unidentified “scholars”—their scholastic credentials are unknown—who produced the Queen James Bible suggest that all Bible translations of these eight verses are wrong and that they are the only ones who have got it right. Below are the eight verses. The King James Version is shown first, followed by the Queen James Version and some comments concerning each change:
Genesis 19:5: “And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, ‘Where are the men which came in to thee this night? Bring them out unto us, that we may know them’” (KJV). (The expression “to know,” in this context, means to have sexual intercourse.)
“And they called out unto Lot, and said unto him, ‘Where are the men which came in to thee this night? Bring them out unto us, that we may rape and humiliate them’” (QJV, emphasis added).
The change from “know them” to “rape and humiliate them” is based on the idea that male-on-male rape is not really a sexual act but is an expression of power and domination. It is clear that physical rape was what the men of Sodom had in mind, but nowhere in the Hebrew text is the word humiliate used.
Leviticus 18:22: “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination” (KJV). Leviticus 20:13: “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them” (KJV).
The editors of the Queen James Version reckon that Leviticus is outdated as a moral code. They say the Hebrew word translated “abomination” is something that was “ritually unclean” or a “taboo.” From this they assert that a biblical “abomination” would be understood by today’s standards to be something “scandalous.” Because they do not consider homosexual relations to be taboo (and because not all abominable offenses were punishable by death), the publishers of the QJV conclude that, at some point in time, there must have been an error in translation. Whereas Leviticus 20:13 clearly says that men lying together is an “abomination,” punishable by death, the editors of the Queen James Bible claim that, if having sex with a man was punishable by death, it wouldn’t be called an abomination. However, it is clear that to lie with a person does not mean simply to be prone and go to sleep. The biblical expression “to lie with” means to have sexual relations (see Genesis 39:12).
The editors of the Queen James Version want us to believe that Leviticus 18:12 and 20:13 are all about pagan worship of the god Molech. They have therefore taken the liberty of adding to the Word of God. This is how they have rendered these two passages:
“Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind in the temple of Molech; it is an abomination” (QJV, emphasis added).
“If a man also lie with mankind in the temple of Molech, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them” (QJV, emphasis added).
So, according to the editors of the QJV, it is “abominable” for a man have sex with a man if they’re in the temple of Molech, but it’s not “abominable” for a man to have sex with a man if it has nothing to do with Molech worship.
Romans 1:26–27: “For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet” (KJV).
The plain reading of this passage indicates that lesbianism and homosexuality are unnatural. The Greek words for “against nature” mean “monstrous, abnormal and perverse; that which is contrary to nature’s laws.”
But the editors of the Queen James Bible assert that verse 26 is not talking about women engaging in lesbian sex. Neither do they accept that lesbianism is “unnatural.” While acknowledging that they really have no idea what is meant by women engaging in the “unnatural” use of their bodies, they suggest it could mean pagan dancing. As for the men, we are to believe the “unseemly” behavior is sexual activity linked to idolatry. The Queen James Bible reads thus:
“Their women did change their natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, left of the natural use of the woman, burned in ritual lust, one toward another; Men with men working that which is pagan and unseemly. For this cause God gave the idolators up unto vile affections, receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet” (QJV, emphasis added). Note how they have again added to the Word of God to conform it to their thinking.
The editors of the Queen James Bible claim that most scholars believe the sin in Romans 1 isn’t being gay or lesbian or having gay sex. The sin, they say, is pagan worship. Interestingly, there is no evidence to back up their claim that “most scholars” agree with them.
1 Corinthians 6:9: “Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolators, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind” (KJV).
The Greek word for “soft” is translated as “effeminate”; that is, a “soft, womanly man.” But the Queen James Bible editors claim that the word effeminate is unrelated to how the word is used today; rather, it means “morally weak.” The Greek word arsenokoites translated here as “abusers of themselves with mankind,” refers to sodomites, males engaging in same-gender sexual activity. However, the QJV editors claim this means “the male who has many beds,” an expression referring to men who are promiscuous. They say that, since no specific Greek word for homosexuality was used, they are justified in “translating” it as “promiscuous.” The phrase “abusers of themselves with mankind” has simply been replaced in the QJV:
“Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolators, nor adulterers, nor morally weak, nor promiscuous” (QJV, emphasis added).
1 Timothy 1:10: “For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine” (KJV).
The editors of the Queen James Bible objected to the expression “defile themselves with mankind,” so they simply deleted “with mankind”:
“For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine” (QJV, emphasis added).
Jude 1:7: “Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire” (KJV). “Strange flesh” here refers to illicit use of the human body.
The editors of the Queen James Bible felt that this recount of the story of Sodom needed clarification. So, the “strange flesh” the mob of Sodom was seeking was “angelic flesh”; that is, it was only “strange” because it was nonhuman. Thus, the sexual violence the men of Sodom wanted to perform on Lot’s guests cannot be truly called a homosexual act:
“Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after nonhuman flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire” (QJV, emphasis added). However, the men of Sodom didn’t know Lot’s guests were angels! For all they knew, the guests were men, just like they. The implication is that Jude is denouncing men having sex with men, not men lusting after angels.
Jesus warned against altering one jot or tittle from God’s Word (Matthew 5:18). Yet the unidentified editors of the Queen James Bible have seen fit to boldly remove anything they dislike and add words that have no right to be there—all to try to make God say what they want said. They are trying to hammer a square peg into a round hole, linguistically speaking, and it will never work. What are their scholastic credentials? Where can seekers of truth go to verify their claims? Are we to believe that all other Bible translators succumbed to “interpretive ambiguity,” while only the editors of the QJV have seen the truth of the text?
There is no textual support for the changes they have made to these eight passages pf Scripture. The only reason for making such changes is to accomplish their stated goal of making “homophobic interpretations impossible.” In other words, they are twisting the Word of God to suit their agenda. Source
Conservative Christian World News
Usually the Lord doth no great thing for or against his people, without giving warning of it before it comes.
They perverted justice among themselves (v. 7): “You turn judgment to wormwood, that is, you make your administrations of justice bitter and nauseous, and highly displeasing both to God and man.’’ That fruit has become a weed, a weed in the garden; as nothing is more venerable, nothing more valuable, than justice duly administered, so nothing is more hurtful, nothing more abominable, than designedly doing wrong under colour and pretence of doing right. Corruptio optimi est pessima —The best, when corrupted, becomes the worst.
It is impossible to find anyone in the Bible who was a power for God who did not have enemies and was not hated.
2 Corinthians 4:8-11 New King James Version (NKJV)
8 We are hard-pressed on every side, yet not crushed; we are perplexed, but not in despair; 9 persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed— 10 always carrying about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life of Jesus also may be manifested in our body. 11 For we who live are always delivered to death for Jesus’ sake, that the life of Jesus also may be manifested in our mortal flesh.
“Pedophile” have reverberated throughout America. But beneath our anger and revulsion, a fundamental question pulsates: Are those who abuse their positions of trust to prey upon children—a category certainly not limited to those in religious orders—sick … or are they evil? We need the answer to that fundamental question. Because, without the truth, we cannot act. And until we act, nothing will change.
My job is protecting children. It has taken me from big cities to rural outposts, from ghettos to penthouses, and from courtrooms,into demonic battlefields. But whatever the venue, the truth remains constant: Some humans intentionally hurt children. They commit unspeakable acts—for their pleasure, their profit, or both.
#Antichrist #evildoers #suppressingtruth #birthpains #tribulation #sevenyears #hellonearth #those that have ears, let him hear, those that have eyes let them see!
“Hate speech” is a completely made-up concept with no actual definition or meaning
MY MISSION IS NOT TO CONVINCE YOU, ONLY TO INFORM…
The number of Orphans aging out of Child Protective Custody has grown at an alarming rate. The 127 Faith Foundation receives many requests each week to house them at our ranch. Our prayer is that the good people of our country will step up to the challenge and offer financial support for "the least among us." We need your help! StevieRay Hansen, Founder, The 127 Faith Foundation
We make every effort to acknowledge sources used in our news articles. In a few cases, the sources were lost due to a technological glitch. If you believe we have not given sufficient credit for your source material, please contact us, and we will be more than happy to link to your article.