Ungodly Fox News: "COVID vaccines and boosters shown to protect pregnant women and newborns: transferred protection"; No, ONLY antibody levels were examined! not safety! The COVID mRNA technology gene-based injection is actually dangerous to the vaccinee and dangerous to the child in utero, the new-born infant, the developing child, etc. Just go ask Dr. James A. Thorp and Peter McCullough: INNATE immune

HNewsWire:

No pregnancy outcomes or adverse effects or other adverse effects were studied, and so Siegel is misdirecting you as usual on these COVID vaccines.

Sadly, corruption and disinformation especially health information as it relates to COVID continue to come from FOX News when you would have thought that they were different from CNN and the other crazies but no, see this headline:

I guess the idiots at FOX never heard of the expert Dr. James Thorp and what his research work uncovered as to the COVID mRNA shots during pregnancy and the impact on pregnany outcomes for the baby and even the pregnant mother:

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202209.0430/v2

‘COVID-19 vaccines, when compared to the Influenza vaccines, are associated with a significant increase in AE with all proportional reporting ratios of > 2.0:

menstrual abnormalities,

miscarriage,

fetal chromosomal abnormalities,

fetal malformation,

fetal cystic hygroma,

fetal cardiac disorders,

fetal arrhythmias,

fetal cardiac arrest,

fetal vascular malperfusion,

fetal growth abnormalities,

fetal abnormal surveillance,

fetal placental thrombosis,

low amniotic fluid,

preeclampsia,

premature delivery,

preterm premature rupture of membrane,

fetal death/stillbirth,

and premature baby death (all p values were much smaller than 0.05).

When normalized by time-available, doses-given, or persons-received, all COVID-19 vaccine AE far exceed the safety signal on all recognized thresholds.

Conclusions Pregnancy complications and menstrual abnormalities are significantly more frequent following COVID-19 vaccinations than Influenza vaccinations. A worldwide moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy is advised until randomized prospective trials document safety in pregnancy and long-term follow-up in offspring.’

As usual and not to be outdone (only by the other COVID vaccine shills Sapphire and Nesheiwat), the main COVID vaccine shill Marc Siegel had to opine revealing his lack of understanding of the virology, immunology, vaccinology. Just dismisses the harms that we know have accumulated due to the mRNA technology Pfizer and Moderna injections (The COVID response and vaccine Apocalypse Horsemen Malone, Kariko, Weissman, Sahin, Bourla, Bancel, Fauci, Francis Collins et al.).

FOX News medical dolt in chief once again shows you how inept he is and always was a vaccine shill during COVID and he will not stop:

This is the study in question:

 

This is my novice voice speaking and I open this up to experts like Geert VB etc.:

I am stunned by Siegel’s misstatements. Lack of understanding. As a FOX medical expert? Does he not realize that if the study shows that the vaccine-induced maternal antibodies cross placenta, that is horrendous for the child in utero for that child is getting vaccine, vaccine-induced COVID antibodies, mRNA and fragments, spike protein and sub-units and fragments and these are dangerous, along with the lipid-nano particles (LNPs). Devastating ad causes bleeding, clotting, VITT, aneurysms, brain bleeds etc. In short, does the dolt not get that vaccinating mother is like vaccinating child? And that the vaccine-induced antibodies have been shown to be not just non-neutralizing (does not sterilize the virus in that it does not stop infection, replication, transmission), but it is also an endothelial pathogen and the glycocalyx that extends into the lumen of a cardiovascular blood vessel is also damaged with the endothelial layer;

does Siegel not understand the immunology (and I am a novice) and that the child’s INNATE immune system (first line versus second line acquired adaptive immune system and separate to ‘complement’) which is broadly protective yet naive and demands ‘training’ and development, education (after maternal protection wanes at 6 months or so), is subverted, side-lined, outcompeted (the low affinity low specificity innate antibodies are outcompeted by the high affinity vaccinal antibodies for the target antigen etc.) by the COVID vaccine induced antibodies?

The COVID vaccine-induced antibodies have higher affinity and stronger binding than the innate antibodies. This impacts how the new born, the growing child’s innate and full immune system will handle pathogen it is confronted with now (e.g. COVID), pathogen in the future (e.g. other glycosilated viruses), and how the innate antibodies train the natural killer cells (NK cells) in its education of the immune system, in handling of ‘self’ from ‘non-self’ (self-like, self-mimicking as the child’s immune system must be trained in recognizing what belongs to child and does not (especially as the virus infected cell takes on appearance of belonging to child) to mitigate the risk of auto-immune disease). Does he not understand the danger to the child’s developing INNATE immune system in a critical window of training? Does he not read the accumulated science on the harms of the mRNA technology gene based injection on the child in utero and the pregnant woman?

Full Story