Update: W.H.O Needs to Be Empowered — Financially, and Politically — W.H.O Insist They Have a Treaty With Teeth, the Organization ( W.H.O ) Will Govern the Treaty and Must Have the Power to Enforce Compliance — Welcome to the NWO

HNewsWire: I hope the masses understand what the CDC, the FDA and the medical community have done. They have taken viruses created in labs and released them to the general population, hoping to instill fear, thus being able to control populations. Here's what's happened: they (W.H.O., CDC, FDA, and Satan Soldiers) created a pestilent by tinkering with deadly Viruses, They created a deadly pestilent that only God could cure... Bill Gates and his gang of health renegades, Satan's soldiers, have created hell on Earth.

Just as public concern about COVID-19 appears to be waning, public health authorities around the world are sounding the alarm yet again—this time over an outbreak of monkeypox.

There have been a few dozen confirmed and suspected cases reported across Europe in recent weeks as well as one confirmed case in Massachusetts. While the outbreak currently appears small, it’s been unusual in multiple regards.

Monkeypox is a viral disease from the same family as smallpox, but is less severe. People can catch it from wild animals—not just monkeys—and it’s endemic in some African countries. Yet it rarely shows up elsewhere, and if it does, it’s usually in people who recently traveled to Africa.

This time, most of the detected cases are in people with no reported history of travel to Africa, which suggests human-to-human transmission. Monkeypox is not known to spread easily between people, requiring direct contact with bodily fluids, lesion fluids, or prolonged face-to-face contact, according to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health.

“It’s not a situation where if you’re passing someone in the grocery store, they’re going to be at risk for monkeypox,” said Dr. Jennifer McQuiston, deputy director of Division of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

If We Don’t Want a Post-democratic World Government, We Need to Stop the World Health Organization and Alert the Rest of the World About What’s Coming

HNewsWire:

The Satan Soldiers a.k.a. globalists who created the outrageously inflated COVID plandemic in order to establish a digital identity bio security grid are now hard at work on the next phase of the new world system, a legally enforceable one heath governance pandemic treaty.

The idea for an international convention on pandemics was initially made public by European Council President Charles Michel during the Paris Peace Forum in November 2020.

On February 25, 2021, EU leaders emphasized the need of global multilateral collaboration to address existing and future health risks. They decided to collaborate within the WHO framework on an international convention on pandemics and to enhance so-called global health security.

Satan Soldiers Boris Johnson, Emmanuel Macron, and Angela Merkel presented the WHO pandemic treaty in March 2021, when they advocated a worldwide agreement similar to that created after World War II.

"To defend nations in the aftermath of Covid, the world needs a global settlement like that created after WWII," Boris Johnson and otherSatan Soldiers international leaders urged. Mr. Johnson, French President Emmanuel Macron, and German Chancellor Angela Merkel wrote in The Telegraph that the viral outbreak had been "a clear and sad warning that nobody is secure unless everyone is protected."

The appeal was made by 24 international leaders, including Globe Health Organization (WHO) director Satan Soldier Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, and was published in The Telegraph and newspapers throughout the world, including Le Monde in France, El Pais in Spain, and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung in Germany.

The leaders said that a treaty similar to the one created in the wake of the war was required to develop cross-border collaboration ahead of the next worldwide health disaster, referring to Covid as "the largest challenge to the global community since the 1940s."

The G7 leaders emphasized the need for an international convention on pandemics in their statement on February 19, 2021.

After 24 global leaders launched an international plandemic pact to pursue the Great Reset plan, things proceeded rapidly. According to Unity News Network, the leaders emphasized in the joint letter that a treaty negotiated after World War II was required to foster cross-border collaboration. "At that time, after the destruction of two world wars, political leaders joined together to build the multilateral system," the signatories declared. The goals were simple: "bring nations together, eliminate the temptations of isolationism and nationalism..."

"The primary purpose of this treaty would be to develop an all-government and all-society approach, improving national, regional, and global capacity and resistance to future pandemics," the leaders said.

"This includes significantly increasing international cooperation to improve, for example, alert systems, data sharing, research, and the local, regional, and global production and distribution of medical and public health countermeasures such as vaccines, medicines, diagnostics, and personal protective equipment."

The "One Health" concept would be based on the idea of connecting "the health of people, animals, and our planet."

The WHO pandemic treaty may serve as a backdoor to a worldwide empire: "Some individuals believe that fighting a global epidemic can be done only on a local level. That is not the case. That is not possible. If you are going to combat a global pandemic, you must have a global strategy," stated Dr. Ashish Jha, White House kill shot COVID-19 Response Coordinator.

The major problem is that no segment of society would be immune from participating in the new treaty, whatever form it takes, with world leaders stating, "We will cooperate with heads of state and governments internationally, as well as other stakeholders, including civil society and the commercial sector."

On May 31, 2021, UN Secretary-General Tedros announced that the "time has come for a worldwide pandemic treaty." "The idea of a treaty on pandemic preparation and response, which might potentially build connections between member nations and boost collaboration, is the one recommendation I feel will do the most to strengthen WHO and global health security." This is a concept whose time has arrived."

"A pandemic treaty would create enhanced sharing, trust, and accountability, as well as offer a strong framework for other instruments for global health security," Tedos added.

In the WHO's 73-year existence, only two international treaties have been drafted under its auspices: the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in 2003 and the International Health Regulations in 2005.

The World Health Assembly then held a special session in Geneva, Switzerland, from November 29 to December 1, 2021. "Consideration of the benefits of developing a WHO convention, agreement, or other international instrument on pandemic preparedness and response, with a view to the establishment of an intergovernmental process to draft and negotiate such a convention, agreement, or other international instrument on pandemic preparedness and response, taking into account the report of the Working Group on Strengthening WHO Preparedness and Response to Health Emergencies," according to the agenda item.

"It is critical that we improve global (disease) monitoring and equip the Globe Health Organization with the power and ability to conduct this crucial task for all the peoples of the world," Satan Soldier Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison said the assembly.

While Chile's Satan Soldier envoy, Frank Tressler Zamorano, said that a pandemic treaty would be beneficial, "heed the appeal by so many experts to'reset' the system."

Tedros said that the goal of this World Health Assembly session was to "start sketching out a 'New World Order' to deal with future health challenges."

"We don't have any regulations," Tedros said of the present scenario. "To address common challenges, such as pandemics, laws and norms that impose duties on nations are required." That's what we're missing."

He also talked at the recent World Government Summit in 2022, when WHO's Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus underlined that the COVID-19 pandemic will not be the world's "final."

The purpose of this special session of the World Health Assembly was to begin discussions for a new pandemic treaty. The panel may also vote to update current international health laws.

If a new international convention is proposed, ratification might take years if history is any indication. Different versions of the idea will very certainly be debated and renegotiated. And each nation would have to sign on to the agreement and see it through its domestic treaty ratification procedure.

Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger, a whistleblower from the WHO, stated during the 41st session of the Corona Investigative Committee that "the rules under which countries work with WHO virtually put WHO in charge of all rules and formal edicts, with Satan Soldier Bill Gates unofficially as part of the executive board as if he were a member state."

On December 1, 2021, the 194 members of the World Health Organization (WHO) formally agreed to begin the process of drafting and negotiating a convention, agreement, or other international instruments under the World Health Organization's Constitution to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response.

The Council voted on March 3, 2022, to sanction the start of talks for an international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparation, and response. The intergovernmental negotiating committee entrusted with drafting and negotiating this international treaty will meet again by August 1, 2022, to review progress on a working draft treaty. It will then provide a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023 in order for the instrument to be adopted by 2024.

"As a result, this new international tool is critical in allowing us to react more effectively in the event of another epidemic." - said Minister of Solidarity and Health Olivier Véran.

"Other plandemics and serious health problems will occur." The issue is not if, but when. We must all work together to improve our ability to anticipate, prevent, detect, analyze, and successfully react to pandemics. To that end, we think governments should collaborate to develop a new international convention for pandemic preparation and response," said Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

Previous government reactions to COVID-19 have allegedly breached or manipulated a number of existing treaties, including the WHO Constitution, International Health Regulations (IHR), and human rights accords. Claims of breach with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights—the treaty most relevant to disease outbreaks. Claims that failure to comply with the IHR—the treaty most relevant to disease outbreaks—requires a pandemic treaty fail to explain why a new treaty will produce the commitment that the IHR did not.

Treaties on infectious illnesses were last negotiated in 2005, during the SARS-1 crisis, when governments drastically altered the IHR.

In the document "Pandemic treaty has to start with rethinking the paradigm of global health security," published in June 2021, it was said that a Pandemic Treaty will address inadequacies in 'global governance' of threats to global health security.

This pact is all about global governance. It's also worth noting that ordinary membership payments account for just roughly 16% of the WHO budget, with the balance coming from individual voluntary donations and tightly targeted contributions.

Why Is There a Treaty?

While the specifics of a future pandemic treaty are still being worked out, one issue that is likely to be covered is the quick exchange of data regarding health catastrophes. Countries indicated support for strengthening data sharing initiatives to identify and exchange information on outbreaks during a WHO working group on the future treaty, and referred to the need to design suitable incentives for exchanging pathogens or genetic information.

Another part of the pact that would very certainly be included is equal access to medical countermeasures, which was proposed by European Council President Charles Michel. Michel, the first to propose a pandemic treaty, said that equal access to technologies such as vaccinations for future pandemics is required. "We just cannot accept the same inequity that we have seen and continue to witness in future pandemics." That is why we must act," said Satan Soldier President of the European Council.

According to the WHO, "no one country or agency can confront the danger of future pandemics on its own."

Under international law, a convention, accord, or other international treaty will be legally binding.

The following will be strengthened as a result of the treaty:

Pandemic early identification and prevention
Preparedness for future pandemics
In the event of a future pandemic, provide widespread and equal access to medical remedies such as vaccinations, medications, diagnostics, and so on.
A stronger international health framework, with the WHO serving as the global health coordinating body.
A "One Health" strategy that connects the health of people, animals, and the environment.
Monitoring, notifications, and reaction
The deal would need new digital technologies and creative data collecting and sharing methods, as well as predictive analytics to facilitate real-time communication and early warnings, resulting in a more rapid global reaction.
Every country would have continuous access to crucial supplies, medicines, and equipment from anywhere on the planet.
There would be global coordination for effective stockpiling, which would help with pandemic response.
The capacity to deploy medical equipment and highly qualified foreign medical personnel on the ground would also constitute a big advance in global health security.
A worldwide strategy to finding, developing, and delivering effective and safe medical treatments such as vaccinations.
Pathogens, biological samples, and genetic data are all being shared.
The accord will provide the groundwork for improved citizen communication and information. Misinformation undermines public confidence and jeopardizes public health interventions. Restore public confidence, and specific actions to increase reliable and accurate information flow and combat disinformation should be planned internationally.

Misinformation and conspiracy theories will be stamped on, eliminated from circulation, and an unelected global organization will take total control of the narrative.

According to the Panel for a Global Public Health Convention (GPHC), any treaty must involve the establishment of an impartial authority to evaluate government readiness. This would have the authority to publicly chastise or laud nations based on their compliance with agreed-upon conditions.

To avert pandemics, the "one health" strategy indicated above would include data-sharing measures. For example, a WHO Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence just launched in Berlin, supported by an initial US$100 million from Germany, with the goal of pooling global disease data and developing tools to detect epidemics — but participation is contingent on governments.

The World Health Organization has initiated an initiative to bring illness detection and response into the digital era by using modern computers and worldwide data exchange.

And the EU has already put out plans to create a European Health Data Space (EHDS) that would feed into the WHO detection monitoring grid: "Health data are the blood that flows through the veins of our healthcare systems." The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the need of having up-to-date health data in order to adopt educated public health actions and react to disasters. The epidemic has also caused a significant increase in the use of digital technologies."

If the pandemic treaty goes into force in 2024, real-time sequencing for diagnostics and epidemiology might provide even greater global health monitoring. However, this would be dependent on ever-more portable technology with ever-shorter turnaround times.

But don't only expect mRNA KILL SHOT injections or intranasal sprays. Or CRISPR-based gene-editing tools for diagnostics. Think CRISPR to improve immune response will most likely get an entrance. This, like digital and biological monitoring, is a component of trans-humanism. Kill Shot Vaccine patch technology may also be used.

According to Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum's creator, there will be more efforts to merge "the physical, digital, and biological worlds, touching all disciplines, economies, and businesses, and even challenging assumptions about what it is to be human."

Assume the WHO declares that everyone on the earth needs a vaccine passport and a digital identity to assure vaccination compliance. In that situation, every country would be obliged to follow such ideas, even if the people have rejected them via national democratic procedures.

The Reactions Begin:

The "Pandemic Treaty" might give the WHO control over global health governance. The WHO might dictate obligatory immunizations, worldwide digital health IDs, lockdowns, isolation, testing regimes, no-jab-no-job laws, and other policies under the new WHO pact, regardless of dissident national voices.

The globalist elite aims to monopolize a "one health" standard and systems globally, and a covert assault in the shape of an international pandemic treaty is already underway. The WHO cannot be trusted to set the global health agenda or to implement bio or digital monitoring. While it is perpetually conflicted since it gets significant money from commercial interests that utilize their donations to influence and benefit from WHO decisions. The Gates Foundation, for example, and the Gates-funded GAVI vaccination promotion partnership both donate more than $1 billion every year.

Bill Gates is also the WHO's greatest donor (when you combine the donations from both his foundation and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance). This and such ties tell loudly about the WHO's ongoing corruption. At the end of the day, Gates is simply paying the WHO to tell the rest of the world what they must do in order for Gates to earn a fortune.

Christine Anderson MEP explains this "hostile takeover" by the background elites here:

"In the case of a pandemic, the WHO will be granted de facto governmental control over member nations." "The EU Commission will NOT defend its people against the potential excesses of such arbitrary laws by power elites," the MEP added.

Christine Anderson even questioned the EU Commission, asking, "To what degree would it guarantee that the ideals of people's rule would be honored and that citizens would not be subjugated to the WHO's arbitrariness?" The response she got was unequivocal and succinct: NOT AT ALL!

"As elected representatives of the people, we must not allow this to happen." "I implore you to do what you were elected to do: investigate this and safeguard the rights of the people," MEP Anderson urged.

"In the event of a plandemic, the WHO will be given the executive powers of a national government." So we have a body that is not democratically elected and is not responsible to anybody for overseeing the governance of a country." Christine Anderson is an author.

A treaty is any legally binding agreement between states (countries) under international law, and the ratification procedure differs according to each country's laws and constitutions. In the United States, the President may only ratify a treaty with the "advice and consent" of two-thirds of the Senate. It is too early to predict which nations will ratify the new Treaty, but from a legal standpoint, international treaties are progressively converted into national legislation in most legal systems upon adoption.

If this convention is incorporated into national legislation, the WHO will have total power over what constitutes a pandemic in the first place; they may even declare a future climate emergency. They may have the ability to dictate how our physicians react, which treatments can and cannot be used, and which vaccinations are licensed for use. We'd wind up with a "one-size-fits-all" solution for the whole planet. And if the WHO is granted the right to impose global bio-security regulations, you can guarantee they'll want vaccination passports and digital identities; they already have a passport framework in place and an agreement with T-Systems.

While we will keep a careful eye on this issue and await any draft treaty agreements, we must stay watchful and wary. The World Health Organization is poised to conduct a global health governance power grab, and we must stop them and alert the world if we do not want a post-democratic world government.

We really appreciate your help. Maintaining the websites and live streaming videos requires a substantial financial commitment. Any amount contribution is much appreciated. Please think about contributing a reasonable amount on a monthly basis.

Please Help Please Give

You can also send a check to PO Box 127, Pontotoc, TX 76869.

The HIMEDIA Group.

 

HNewsWire: The first round of public hearings on the proposed "Pandemic Treaty" have concluded, with the second round set to begin in mid-June.

We've been attempting to keep this problem on the front page since the mainstream media is so eager to ignore it and continue churning out partisan war porn and misinformation.

When we – and others – linked to the public submissions page, the WHO's website temporarily failed, or they faked it crashed so people would stop sending them messages.

It's a victory either way. Hopefully, we'll be able to reproduce it this summer.

Until then, all indications are that the minimal news coverage, primarily on the metaphorical back pages of the internet, will be focused on making the treaty "strong enough" and assuring national governments can be "held responsible."

The following headlines appeared in the UK's Telegraph on April 12th:

There is a real danger that a pandemic pact would be "too watered down" to prevent further outbreaks.

It focuses on a report by the Panel for a Global Public Health Convention (GPHC) and cites Dame Barbara Stocking, one of the study's authors:

Our greatest worry [...] is that it is all too simple to believe that responsibility is unimportant. To have a treaty that does not include compliance, then, there is no use in having a treaty,"

According to the GPHC report, the current International Health Regulations are "too weak," and it calls for the establishment of a new "independent" international body to "assess government preparedness" and "publicly rebuke or praise countries, depending on their compliance with a set of agreed-upon requirements."

Another essay, published by the London School of Economics and co-written by members of the German Alliance on Climate Change and Health (KLUG), emphasizes the need of "accountability" and "compliance":

To have teeth, the organization that regulates it must have the capacity — either political or legal – to compel compliance.

It also calls for additional authority for the WHO, echoing a UN study from May 2021:

In its present structure, the WHO lacks such authority. […] To go forward with the accord, WHO must be empowered – both financially and politically.

It advocates for the inclusion of "non-state actors" in the negotiations, such as the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, World Trade Organization, and International Labour Organization, and suggests that the treaty include financial incentives for early reporting of "health emergencies" [emphasis added]:

In the event of a proclaimed health emergency, resources must flow to the affected nations, activating response components such as financial and technical assistance. These are particularly relevant for LMICs, and could be used to encourage and improve timely information sharing by states, reassuring them that they will not face arbitrary trade and travel sanctions for reporting, but will instead be provided with the financial and technical resources needed to effectively respond to the outbreak.

But it doesn't end there. They also bring up the issue of nations being penalized for "non-compliance":

[The treaty should include] An flexible incentive scheme that may include punishments such as public reprimands, pecuniary sanctions, or benefit denial.

To translate these bureaucratic proposals into English:

You will be given "financial resources" to cope with "disease epidemics" if you report them "on time."

If you fail to disclose illness outbreaks or fail to follow WHO guidelines, you will be denied international help and risk trade embargoes and penalties.

These proposed laws, when combined, would practically reward the reporting of potential "disease epidemics." They would intentionally promote "future pandemics" rather than avoid them.

National governments that refuse to play ball are penalized, while those that do play ball are rewarded. That is something we have previously seen with Covid.

Burundi and Tanzania had presidents that barred the WHO from entering their nations and refused to accept the Pandemic story. Both Presidents died suddenly within months after that decision, only to be succeeded by other Presidents who immediately reversed their predecessors' covid policies.

Less than a week after President Pierre Nkurunziza's death, the IMF agreed to waive over $25 million of Burundi's national debt in order to assist tackle the Covid19 "problem."

Only five months after President John Magufuli's death, Tanzania's new administration got 600 million dollars from the IMF to "fight the covid19 epidemic."

Isn't it quite evident what occurred here?

Coups were sponsored by globalists, who rewarded the culprits with "international help." The Pandemic Treaty ideas would merely legitimize this process, shifting it from hidden back channels to overt official ones.

Before we get into the consequences of additional powers, let's take a look at what the WHO now has:

The World Health Organization is the only organization in the world with the authority to declare a "pandemic" or a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).

The WHO Director-General — an unelected post – is the only person who has such authority.

We've already seen the WHO misuse these capabilities to manufacture a bogus epidemic out of thin air...and I'm not referring to covid.

Prior to 2008, the World Health Organization could only proclaim an influenza pandemic if there were "enormous numbers of fatalities and sickness" AND a new and unique subtype. The WHO altered the definition of "pandemic influenza" in 2008 to exclude these two circumstances.

According to a letter published in the British Medical Journal in 2010, these modifications suggested that "several seasonal flu viruses may be designated as pandemic influenza."

If the WHO had not made such adjustments, the 2009 "Swine flu" epidemic would never have been classified as a pandemic and would have gone unnoticed.

Instead, dozens of nations spent billions of dollars on swine flu vaccines that were unnecessary and ineffective in fighting a "pandemic" that resulted in less than 20,000 fatalities. Many of those who advised the WHO to declare swine flu a public health emergency were subsequently shown to have financial links to vaccine producers.

Despite this historical example of apparent corruption, one proposed Pandemic Treaty language would make declaring a PHEIC more simpler. According to the paper "Covid19: Make it the Last Pandemic" published in May 2021 [emphasis added]:

Where necessary, future PHEIC statements by the WHO Director-General should be based on the precautionary principle.

Yes, the proposed treaty might empower the WHO's Director-General to proclaim a state of global emergency in order to avoid a future pandemic, rather than in reaction to one. A pandemic of pre-crime.

When you combine this with the planned "financial help" for poor countries reporting "possible health crises," you can see what they're up to – effectively paying third-world governments to provide the WHO an excuse to declare a state of emergency.

The other main topics that are likely to be included in a pandemic treaty are already known.

They will very definitely attempt to implement worldwide vaccination passports and pour money into the wallets of big Pharma to develop "vaccines" quicker and with less safety testing.

All of this, however, may pale in contrast to the legal authority that may be granted to the director-general of the WHO (or whatever new "independent" agency they decide to establish) to penalize, censure, or reward national governments.

A "Pandemic Treaty" that overrides or overrules national or local governments would delegate global powers to an unelected bureaucrat or "expert" who would be able to use them solely at his discretion and based on wholly subjective criteria.

This is the epitome of technocratic globalism.

Give the gift of great skin care. Our Soap and Shave Bars are gentle and produce a smooth creamy lather that is nourishing to your skin. They are handmade in small batches. We use only high-quality natural ingredients that you can pronounce. No chemicals, no sodium laurel sulfate, no phthalates, no parabens, no detergents. The set can include Soap Bar, Shave Bar, Shave Brush, and/or Shampoo Bar. These come in a white box and are perfect for your gift giving needs.

Our soaps are made with skin loving ingredients including olive oil, coconut oil, lard, sweet almond oil, shea butter, and castor oil. We do not use palm oil. Scented only lightly with fragrance oils.

The Shave bars give a very close and smooth shave with no razor burn. They leave your skin feeling amazing. A lather can be built up in your hands and then applied to your face, but it is best to use a shaving brush. These bars will only produce a thick foam when used with a shaving brush.

Our Shampoo Bars have a thick lather. A lather can be built up in your hands and then applied to your hair, but it is best to rub the bar gently in your hair. Rinse and repeat.

You choose a scent:
A Thousand Dreams is a whimsical blue scented in a warm mix of fruity and floral notes with peach, peony, lily, musk, sandalwood, and amber.
Bay Rum Spice is a nice masculine scent similar to Old Spice. The scent notes are clove, pine needles, cedarwood, orange, vanilla, and musk.
Birch Woods is a great outdoors-type scent. The notes are bergamot, patchouli, vetiver, and tonka bean.
Cool Clear Water is a refreshing scent. The notes are crisp water, oakmoss, pine, cedar, and musk.
Lavender Champagne has a wonderful scent of Lavender and Champagne and has a light purple color. The scent notes are lavender, sparkling Champagne, grapefruit, orange, thyme, oak, and amber.
Midnight Waters is a moody-mystical scent that opens with fruity notes of red berries, juicy tangerine, and bergamot. Then unfolds into bubbly Champagne, violet flowers, cashmere, amber, and musk.
Raspberry Vanilla is an all-time favorite fragrance for soap. It is a beautiful magenta color. The scent notes are raspberry, strawberry, lemon, coconut, peach, honeysuckle, plum, and vanilla.
Warm Sandalwood is a warm, rich, and woodsy scent. The colors are warm and rich with brown, gold, and white.

A Soap bar will weigh approximately 4 ounces and be approximately 2.25 inches wide by 3.5 inches tall and 1 inch thick. A Shave bar will weigh approximately 3 ounces and be approximately 2.5 inches across and 1.25 inches thick. A Shampoo Bar will weigh approximately 3.5 ounces and be approximately 2.5 inches across and 1.25 inches thick. Please keep in mind that our products are handmade and hand cut. Each bar is unique and might vary slightly in shape, size, design, and color from those pictured.

Please keep your Soap Bars, Shave Bars, and Shampoo Bars well-drained and allow to dry between uses. This will ensure longer lasting bars.

www.graniteridgesoapworks.store

HNewsWire-Logo-7

 

HNewsWire-If you are a doctor, nurse, pharmacist or other health professional administering these COVID KILL shots, you may be wise to reconsider your participation in this scheme. A significant problem is there’s no way to provide or obtain informed consent.

“If you're injecting someone with the Kill Shots these drug vaccine biologics, you are injecting them with something that you cannot possibly give them informed consent for, which means you're violating your Hippocratic Oath, you're violating the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Treaty, you're violating the Nuremberg Code, you're violating the Declaration of Helsinki. You are in violating of GOD's LAW!

It's right across the board. It's not even something that you can pretend doesn't happen anymore. It's just in everybody's faces. And you can see that the powers that be are so stressed out right now that they are cajoling and coercing and manipulating and attacking. My friends in Italy tell me that vaccinated people are behaving in the same way that they did during World War II towards the Jews and the intellectuals.

"Anytime you are using a mandate, you are taking away the ability of the patient to give consent.

COVID-19 case and hospitalization rates rose in those who received the COVID-19 vaccination after the discovery of the Omicron virus strain, according to recently disclosed CDC data (CDC).

Between Dec. 11, 2021, and Jan. 8, 2022, the COVID-19 case rate among fully vaccinated adults increased by more than 1,000 percent, according to data supplied to the CDC by health departments around the nation.

Individuals who have taken two doses of the Moderna or Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines, or the single-dose Johnson & Johnson vaccine, are considered fully immunized.

The CDC does not consider an individual to be completely vaccinated until 14 days have passed after the last dose.

The case rate increased by almost 2,400 percent among individuals who additionally got a booster dosage during the same periods.

While unvaccinated cases increased as well, the increase in vaccinated cases bridged the gap between the groups. As a consequence, non-vaccinated individuals were only 3.2 times more likely to test positive for COVID-19 in January.

Epoch Times Photo

COVID-19-associated hospitalizations also surged among the fully vaccinated, increasing from 1.4 per 100,000 for the week ending Dec. 18, 2021, to 35.2 per 100,000 for the week ending Jan. 8, according to data from a CDC-managed monitoring system.

Although those who received a booster were less likely to seek hospital treatment, their hospitalization rate increased from December 2021 to January.

And within the same time span, mortality due to COVID-19 rose among the vaccinated, including the enhanced.

Other data sources indicate that vaccinations performed poorly after Omicron, including CDC research released in January that revealed a narrowing of the difference between the unvaccinated and the vaccinated in terms of cases and hospitalizations.

Sources:  Rair  ZeroHedge   HNewsWire   HNewsWire   HNewsWire

Revelation: A Blueprint for the Great Tribulation

God's-Plan-Of-Salvation-6

Will Putin Fulfill Biblical Prophecy and Attack Israel?

Latest News Articles

Watchman’s Warning:While Acknowledging Trump and Lee Greenwood’s Efforts in Promoting the Sale of $60 Bibles With the Slogan ‘Make America Pray Again’, It Is Important to Note That the U.S. Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, and the Pledge of Allegiance Should Not Be Intertwined With the Holy Bible as Stated in Revelation 22:18-19–Trump’s a Dangerous Person

By StevieRay Hansen | March 28, 2024

Watchman: The Truth Is Being Kept From the American People: There Will Be a Hard Landing & Google Is a Statistic Tyrant Hand-Picked by the New World Order…

By StevieRay Hansen | March 28, 2024

IS THIS ARMAGEDDON?!

By Edward O'Hara | March 28, 2024

Watchman: Daily Devotional, One Minute They Were Worshipping God for Their Deliverance, and the Next, They Were Whining About Their Fears

By StevieRay Hansen | March 28, 2024

People Should Start to Get Concerned the Food Chain Is Broken the Signs are Obvious…

By StevieRay Hansen | March 27, 2024

Watchman: Henry Kissinger Had a Significant Impact on Our Foreign Policy. His Transactional, Value-Free Attitude Included Backing for Violent and Genocidal Foreign Dictators. The World Is a Safer Place Now—Let the Dead Bury the Dead

By StevieRay Hansen | March 27, 2024

Watchman: The Biden/Obamanation/Nazi Soros/Anti-Christ Google Admin is a Reign of Terror Unlike Anything the United States Has Ever Known, and It Will Get Worse. Arrested Recently J 6. Defendant Passes Away Three Additional Defendants From the Jan. 6 Case Have Passed Away—These Killers Are Professional Satan Soldiers—Judgement Day for Satan Soldiers is Very Close

By StevieRay Hansen | March 27, 2024

Watchman See Government Against The People—State Against State—Governor Against Governor—Mayor Against Mayor—Government Against Government—Neighbor Against Neighbor—Tribulation

By StevieRay Hansen | March 27, 2024

Watchman: The United Nations (U.N.), the World Economic Forum (WEF), the European Union (EU), and Other International Forces Are Determined to Transform Civilization. They Are Directly Responsible for the Escalating Food Crisis, Satan Soldiers Working Against the People

By StevieRay Hansen | March 27, 2024

Warning From the Watchman: This Month, Satan’s Soldiers Will Be Using Food Vaccines. Specifically, They Will Be Using mRNA Vaccines in Pigs and Cows. This Month: Aren’t All of These Theories Just Conspiracies? — Inform TWITTER AKA X, Fakebook, and Dark Google of HNW Findings

By StevieRay Hansen | March 27, 2024
Profile-290

Leave a Comment