Watchman: We Should Not Grant COVID Amnesty to Anyone, Because What He (Dershowitz) Said Previously Assisted the Government in Purposely Injuring and Killing People Through the Scam. Gene Injection and mRNA Technology
HNewsWire:
Dr. Lee Merritt: How mRNA vaccines killed animals during testing and how mRNA vaccines could be used to kill millions of people by first injecting them with the so-called vaccine and then
releasing a counterpart even years later to be killed at will. She calls this a binary poison (as it's in two parts); we have never made it with this type of mRNA vaccine for this type of virus.
We have no idea today what is in the vaccine—none! Could we, as a nation, be set up with a binary weapon where we got the shot and then, at some point in the future, they release the virus (or something similar) and we have catastrophic, massive antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of infection and disease? Could this happen? Neither you nor I have any idea what is in the shot. These beasts at Moderna and Pfizer, etc., could have pre-programmed the shots and had so many poison pills in them. That they can turn on with the release of a pathogen in the future. In short, they may have killed millions already, that the vaccinated are ‘walking dead’, vaccinated now, and there is pre-programmed death?
SOURCE:
https://t.me/downtherabbitholewegofolks/70925
Minute 1.37 in V for Vendetta: "I killed you 10 minutes ago... could they have killed us already, it is only a matter of time?" with the shots.
Alexander COVID News—Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's
HNewsWire:
HNewsWire: Do you plan to get the COVID-19 vaccine when it’s available, or will you ‘definitely’ or ‘probably’ refuse it, as 39% of those polled say? If you refuse it, will you be going against the law?
- According to Alan Dershowitz’s interpretation of Constitutional law, you only have the right to refuse to be vaccinated against a disease that would affect only you. You do not have the right to refuse a contagious disease that might spread to others
- As the basis and justification for his legal orientation on this issue, Dershowitz relies on a 1905 Supreme Court ruling in the matter of Jacobson v. Massachusetts
- According to Robert F. Kennedy, there is a “big Constitutional chasm” between this 1905 case and today’s vaccine mandates. Jacobson sued to avoid the vaccine and the fine for refusing the vaccine, which was $5. When he lost, he paid the fine. There’s a big difference between paying a small fine, and being forcibly injected with a potentially hazardous vaccine, against your will
- According to a recent poll, about half of Americans say they want to get the COVID-19 vaccine; 27% say they will “definitely” refuse and another 12% say they will “probably” refuse it
- 1 in 40 people — not 1 in 1 million — are injured by vaccines, and a clinician who administers vaccines will have an average of 1.3 adverse vaccine events per month
- Kill Shot
- KIll Shot
Sources: palexander HNewsWire HNewsWire HNewsWire
