Skip to content

Not In God’s Plan, Impeachment Will Backfire Up-Date: Dec,14 at 10:01 AM

Featured Story

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

She’s Now Facing Wholesale Defections from the Democrat Party Because of Its Impeachment Hysteria…

Anti-impeachment Democratic Rep. Jeff Van Drew of New York has confirmed that he will switch parties and become a Republican, following a lengthy meeting with President Trump, according to Politico.

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

Impeachment Drama Doomed To Fail

Let Me Make This Abundantly Clear. (I Am Apolitical) While I Have a General Distaste for Electric Cars and Politicians No Matter the Party They Belong To, I Am Unashamedly Politically a Bible Believing Conservative Christian. I Have a Severe Distrust of Government. I Believe It Is the Most Inefficient and Ineffective Way to Accomplish Most Things. While I Strongly Disagree with Liberals/Progressives and Conservative on Most Political Issues, and While I Believe Liberals/Progressives and Most Politicians Are Terribly Misguided and Naive About What Big Government Will Eventually Result In, I Strive to Not Question Their Motives. at the Same Time, While I Find Myself in Agreement with Conservative Politicians on Some Issues, I Do Not Believe Electing Republicans Is the Answer to Everything. for Me, Very Sadly, the Main Difference Between Republicans and Democrats Is How Quickly They Want to Drive the Car Towards the Cliff. Simply Put, I Do Not Believe the Government Is the Solution for Everything. I Do Not Place Any Faith, Trust, or Hope in Any Politicians to Fix What Is Wrong with the World. “Come Lord Jesus!” (Revelation 22:20) The prophet does not confuse truth with consensus. The prophet does not confuse God’s word with the word of those who happen to hold power at present, or with the opinion of the majority. This is because powerholders and the majority can fall victim to a lying spirit-and this means a power that actually seizes the majority of experts, the political leadership, and the public.StevieRay Hansen

The Democratic leaders in Congress really should have checked with Central Casting before picking the stars of their passion play: “The Impeachment and Destruction of Donald Trump.”

Former National Security Council staffer Fiona Hill was supposed to appear as a principled and dignified heroine. Instead, her virulent hate, ignorance, and contempt for Russia were apparent to all. And she looked uncannily identical to the late Alan Rickman playing Severus Snape in the Harry Potter movies.

Congressman Adam Schiff chaired the House Intelligence Committee hearing and was supposed to be the wise, fearless and incorruptible chairman. Instead, the camera’s cruel, unblinking eye revealed him as a buffoon – and a sinister one at that.

Schiff’s round bald dome was identical to Mussolini’s and his ridiculous bulging eyes are those of Christopher Lloyd’s evil cartoon villain Judge Doom in the Hollywood movie “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?”

The supposedly heroic Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman of the National Security Council was even worse – Presented as an all-American Patriot, instead, he resembled the thick, hulking brutal thug that Hollywood Central Casting always chooses to play endless Russian intelligence service or criminal villains in thousands of bad primetime TV shows.

Kurt Volker was almost as bad. He was the quiet cool, calm, bespectacled villain – always a CIA bureaucrat and usually played by Ronnie Cox – who wants to feed Matt Damon, Brad Pitt, Steven Seagal or Bruce Willis to the villains.

And of course – the Real Hero could not appear at all. The Whistleblower’s identity is being jealously guarded – though as Senator Rand Paul has pointed out, everyone knows who he is and – far from being a Disinterested Pure Hero, he was a CIA veteran and former senior National Security Council official outspoken in his contempt for the President of the United States: In other words, yet another anonymous Deep State manipulator and apparatchik.

No doubt he will be revealed as the winner on the Fox Television Channel’s popular show, “The Masked Singer.”

Or perhaps he will reveal himself in an exclusive interview with a fawning Rachel Maddow, still masked and identified as “The Lone Ranger.”

(Is this The Whistleblower?)

Now Rand Paul does have the looks, the bearing, the moral fervor, and the dramatic character to play the hero in this botched fiasco of a drama. But there is only one small problem. He is on the other side. He has forcefully publicly defended President Donald Trump.

Gravity – Albert Einstein assures us – “bends” light (A dubious assertion at best but at least Einstein, unlike Schiff and Company Looked the Part he always played – Lovable, Child-Like Jewish Genius Who Never Gets a Hair Cut) And Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) has bent the brains of movie directors Nancy Pelosi and Schiff.

Trump Derangement Syndrome: a fearful, incurable affliction more terrible and humiliating than Alzheimer’s: Better to forget who you are than remember you are a hate-crazed, foaming at the mouth, credulous idiot who will believe anything.

Like all policy wonks of their aging generation of corrupt and complacent Baby Boomers, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Schiff have salivated at the thought of inflicting a “Watergate 2” impeachment drama comeuppance on Donald Trump.

But the Villain of Watergate, Richard Nixon, was indeed an inept and more than slightly sinister creep (and lifelong liberal). He looked the part and he exuded pious bogus ineptitude on camera his entire career. (Nixon’s inspiration for how he projected himself on television was clearly Jack Webb playing Sergeant Joe Friday in the wonderfully badly acted “Dragnet” police series on US television in the 1950s.)

By contrast, Donald Trump channels John Wayne, the most popular and enduring movie star in American history:

Trump is a physically big and fearless New York construction businessman turned immensely successful popular entertainer. He, like Wayne, is a natural athlete. It is a matter of public record ignored by all fearful liberal wimps that Trump really was offered a contract after college to be Major League Baseball player for the Phillies, but he turned it down to focus on his business career.

Working-class American Heartland men and women over 40 instinctively loved Wayne and therefore they love Trump too. Aging American feminists like Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren – and the further they are over 50, the more rabid and rage crazed and insane they become – hated Wayne and are traumatized by his resurrection as a defining national culture hero nearly four decades after his physical death echoing in the figure of Trump.

It was Trump’s genius at silent reaction shots that ridiculed 17 Republican Congress members, Senators and Governors in the 2015-16 campaign before he even began to turn his wit and video skills on Hillary Clinton – a creepy Richard Nixon clone if there was one.

Trump was crafted by Fate and his brilliant media career from The Apprentice to Worldwide Wrestling Central Casting to be the Hero of Impeachment. Making him the villain reverses the entire emotional dynamic of the drama. It is like casting James Stewart as Nixon. (At worst, Trump is classic King Kong eternally plagued by those pesky biplanes: And everybody roots for Kong)

Liberals who loved Watergate went into emotional frenzies over Nixon’s imagined humiliation at the hands of such ludicrous pompous and overpaid fools as Dan Rather of CBS.

Pelosi and her laughably misnamed “advisers” have learned nothing from all this. This week, we are seeing yet more interminable biased show-trial hearings and the even more ludicrous Jerrold Nadler has taken center stage. He looks like Frankenstein’s dwarf –servant Igor in Mel Brooks’ classic 1973 comic horror movie “Young Frankenstein.”

The bottom line on why Impeachment has failed so miserably to whip up a storm or convince anyone beyond the already committed “Trump Must Go”, babies-throwing-tantrums across Liberal America lies in the childishness and elemental incompetence of its cast and directors. Being repulsive and ridiculous human beings themselves, they have no clue how obvious it would be that they would appear that way to everyone else. Source

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

Impeachment Ringleaders Quietly Panic As Moderate Democrats Bail…

Update: According to the New York Times, Pelosi says she’s not going to push moderate Democrats to support the impeachment push, saying she has “no message to them” and that “we’re not whipping this legislation.”

“People have to come to their own decisions,” she said, adding “I don’t say anything to them.”

House Democratic leaders are quietly panicking over rumors that ‘more than two’ Democrats will bail on impeaching President Trump, according to the Washington Post, citing ‘multiple officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk frankly.’ The paper described House Leader Nancy Pelosi’s anguish over defections as “quiet hand-wringing.

Two senior Democratic aides said the total could be as many as a half-dozen, while a third said the number could be higher.

Predictions about some defections come as a core group of centrists from districts Trump won in 2016 are having second thoughts. While many knew impeachment would never be popular in their GOP-leaning districts, some have been surprised that support hasn’t increased despite negative testimony about Trump from a series of blockbuster hearings last month. –Washington Post

According to the report, “several moderates have privately pined for other options,” primarily censure. Others have considered “splitting the baby,” a popular procedure among Democrats, in which they would back one of the two articles of impeachment but not the other.

“I’m still thinking it over,” said one such Democrat, Rep. Susie Lee of Nevada. “This is a very grave decision. . . . I’m hearing all sides of it. . . . It’s mixed, it’s very mixed.”

“As soon as they’re formally adopted, I’ll make a decision,” said New Jersey Democrat Josh Gottheimer, another centrist Democrat who attended a Monday night meeting of moderate Democrats who expressed their misgivings about impeachment. “I’ve said all along, I need to see all the facts. I’m not going to prejudge anything until we get every bit of information.”

WaPo points out that Democratic leaders still have the votes to impeach Trump if moderates bail – as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi can lose 17 Democrats for it to pass.

With 233 Democrats, 197 Republicans and one independent — Rep. Justin Amash (Mich.) — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) can afford to lose 17 Democrats and still prevail.

Amash is expected to vote to impeach Trump, while Republicans are likely to unite in opposition.

That said, the report also notes that Republicans will seek to capitalize on defecting Democrats, painting the narrative that the party is more divided than ever. Source Zero Hedge

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

There is zero chance Trump will be removed from office in a trial in the Senate. The Democratic Party elites have admitted as much. They carried out, they argue, their civic and constitutional duty. But here again, they lie. They picked out what was convenient to impeach Trump and left untouched the rotten system they helped create.

The divisions among Americans will only widen, the hatred will only grow. And tyranny will wrap its deadly tentacles around our throats.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump alleged “abuse of power” and “obstruction of Congress” — the two weakest possible charges among the many the House had been considering.

The term “abuse of power” does not appear in the Constitution’s Impeachment Clause, which specifies that Congress’s power of impeachment covers “Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

That is not simply a conservative, originalist position: many liberal scholars agree.

Harvard Law School professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz, the author of the recent Case Against Impeaching Trumpargues in his that “abuse of power” is never impeachable — at least not without an underlying crime.

WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 4: Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley of George Washington University testifies before the House Judiciary Committee in the Longworth House Office Building on Capitol Hill December 4, 2019 in Washington, DC. This is the first hearing held by the Judiciary Committee in the impeachment inquiry against U.S. …

In this case, there is none.

Constitutional law expert Jonathan Turley testified before the Judiciary Committee last week that while he agreed that a president could be impeached for abuse of power, the Trump case did not qualify, even if his Ukraine phone call was “anything but perfect. ”

In a back-and-forth with Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO), Turley made the point that under the loose “abuse of power” standard applied by the three Democrat-chosen panelists, which measured “abuse of power” by “political benefit,” every president in U.S. history could be impeached — including President Obama himself:

Buck: So let me go with a few examples, and see if you agree with me. Lyndon Johnson. Directed the Central Intelligence Agency to place a spy in Barry Goldwater’s campaign. That spy got advance copies of speeches and other strategy. Delivered that to the Johnson campaign. Would that be that impeachable conduct, according to the other panelists?

Turley: Well, it sweeps pretty broadly, so I assume so.

Buck: How about when President Johnson put a wiretap on Goldwater’s campaign plane? Would that be for political benefit?

Turley: Well, I can’t exclude anything under that definition.

Buck: Okay. Well, I’m going to go with a few other presidents, we’ll see where we go. Congressman [Ted] Deutch [D-FL] informed us that FDR put country first. Now, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, when he was president, directed the IRS to conduct audits of his political enemies — namely Huey Long, William Randolph Hearst, Hamilton Fish, Father Coughlin. Would that be an abuse of power for political benefit according to the other panelists? Would that be impeachable conduct?

Turley: I think it all would be subsumed into it.

Buck: How about when President [John F.] Kennedy directed his brother, [Attorney General] Robert Kennedy to deport one of his mistresses as an East German spy? Would that qualify as impeachable conduct?

Turley: Once again, I can’t exclude it.

Buck: And how about when he directed the FBI to use wiretaps on congressional staffers who opposed him politically? Would that be impeachable conduct?

Turley: It would seem to be falling within it.

Buck: And let’s go to Barack Obama. When Barack Obama directed, or made a finding that the Senate was in recess, and appointed people to the National Labor Relations Board, and lost 9-0 — Ruth Bader Ginsburg voted against the president on this issue — would that be an abuse of power?

Turley: I’m afraid you’d have to direct that to [the] others, but I don’t see exclusions under their definition.

Buck: Okay. And how about when the president [Obama] directed his national security adviser and the secretary of state to lie to the American people about whether the ambassador to Libya was murdered as a result of a video, or was murdered as a result of a terrorist act? Would that be an abuse of power for political benefit, 17 days before the next election?

Turley: Well, not according to my definition. The others will have to respond to their own.

Buck: Well, you’ve heard their definition.

Turley: I can’t —

Buck: You can apply those facts to their definition.

Turley: I have a hard time excluding anything.

Buck: How about when Abraham Lincoln arrested legislators in Maryland so that they wouldn’t convene to secede from the Union? And Virginia already had seceded, so it would have placed Washington, DC, the nation’s capital, in the middle of the rebellion? Would that have been an abuse of power for political benefit?

Turley: Well, it could be under that definition.

Buck: And you mentioned George Washington a little while ago, as perhaps having met the standard of impeachment for your other panelists. In fact, let me ask you something, Professor Turley. Can you name a single president in the history of the United States — save President [William Henry] Harrison, who died 32 days after his inauguration — that would not have met the standard of impeachment for our friends here?

Turley: I would hope to God James Madison would escape. [Laughter] Otherwise, a lifetime of academic work would be shredded. But once again I can’t exclude many of these acts.

Buck: Isn’t what you and I and many others are afraid of, is that the standard that your friends to the right of you — and not politically, but to the right of you sitting on there — that your friends have decided that the bar is so low that when we have a Democrat president in office and a Republican House and a Republican Senate, we’re going to be going through this whole scenario again in a way that really puts the country at risk?

Turley: Well, when your [Democrats’] graphic says, in your “ABCs,” that your “B” is “betrayal of national interests,” I would simply ask, do you really want that to be your standard?

Legal scholar Cass Sunstein, a former Obama administration official and an intellectual leader on the left, published a crucial book, Impeachment: A Citizen’s Guide, in 2017. The book was cited by the House Judiciary Committee in its recent (Democrat) staff report, “Constitutional Grounds for Presidential Impeachment.”

Of “obstruction of Congress,” Sunstein said that a president cannot be impeached simply for resisting subpoenas. A mere “conflict between the branches” of government, he declared, is “no legitimate basis for impeachment.” (p. 92)

Sunstein elaborated: “Presidents should cooperate with legitimate investigations, but it is not a high crime or misdemeanor to refuse to cooperate with a congressional investigation into an offense that is not independently impeachable. Congress cannot gin up an impeachable offense by investigating an offense that is not impeachable, and then encountering presidential resistance.” (pp. 92-93)

Democrats would counter, in this case, that “abuse of power” is indeed an impeachable offense.

Sunstein would probably agree in principle — but in 2017, he noted that almost every president had exceeded his powers in some way: “Almost every American president has, on more than one occasion, passed the bounds of his power, in the sense that his administration has done something that it is not lawfully entitled to do.” (p. 60)

For example, Sunstein noted, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt “unlawfully sent arms to England to help that nation defend itself against Hitler’s aggression.” (p. 60)

Sunstein noted that Alexander Hamilton described an impeachable offense in Federalist No. 65 as “the abuse or violation of some public trust.” Impeachment was understood to cover “terrible abuses of power” (emphasis added), not “mistakes of judgment or of controversial political choices.”

That leaves some room for interpretation. But in the context of past administrations, the “abuse of power” alleged against Trump is miniscule.

And many Trump supporters argue further that Trump was not abusing his powers, but fulfilling them. If there was any basis for investigating former Vice President Joe Biden’s conflict of interest in Ukraine — where his son, Hunter, held a highly-paid position on the board of Burisma, the country’s largest gas company — then Trump did nothing wrong.

In the end, “abuse of power” — unless “terrible” — is too weak and subjective a standard by itself for impeaching a president — if it can be said to be a valid standard for impeachment at all. Source

Let Me Make This Abundantly Clear. (I Am Apolitical) While I Have a General Distaste for Electric Cars and Politicians No Matter the Party They Belong To, I Am Unashamedly Politically a Bible Believing Conservative Christian. I Have a Severe Distrust of Government. I Believe It Is the Most Inefficient and Ineffective Way to Accomplish Most Things. While I Strongly Disagree with Liberals/Progressives and Conservative on Most Political Issues, and While I Believe Liberals/Progressives and Most Politicians Are Terribly Misguided and Naive About What Big Government Will Eventually Result In, I Strive to Not Question Their Motives. at the Same Time, While I Find Myself in Agreement with Conservative Politicians on Some Issues, I Do Not Believe Electing Republicans Is the Answer to Everything. for Me, Very Sadly, the Main Difference Between Republicans and Democrats Is How Quickly They Want to Drive the Car Towards the Cliff. Simply Put, I Do Not Believe the Government Is the Solution for Everything. I Do Not Place Any Faith, Trust, or Hope in Any Politicians to Fix What Is Wrong with the World. “Come Lord Jesus!” (Revelation 22:20) The prophet does not confuse truth with consensus. The prophet does not confuse God’s word with the word of those who happen to hold power at present, or with the opinion of the majority. This is because powerholders and the majority can fall victim to a lying spirit-and this means a power that actually seizes the majority of experts, the political leadership, and the public.StevieRay Hansen

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

God put Trump in office, it will take more than Pelosi and her band of demons to remove him, those that read my articles know I am not a Trump guy, but I do know God handpicks Trump for the fight that lies ahead for the American people. What I do believe, Mr. Trump will be instrumental in bringing the antichrist to the world stage…

“All The Players In This Great Game Of ‘Gotcha’ Are About To Face The Consequences”

The last time the Democratic Party blew up in a presidential election year was 1860. It had evolved from Jefferson’s 1800 bloc of yeoman farmers to Andrew Jackson’s rowdy caucus of frontier populists in the 1830s and settled into a slough of pro-slavery apologists by the 1850s, including two do-nothing Democratic presidents, Pierce and Buchanan. The party held a nominating convention in the spring of 1860 and couldn’t come up with a candidate when a claque of southern “fire-eaters” walked out. They tried again a few months later and cracked up into three separate parties with three nominees — and of course Mr. Lincoln won the election. The result was the bloodiest war in US history.

That’s one way to drain a swamp. Historical obfuscators might say the Civil War was a lofty, legalistic quarrel over “state’s rights,” but of course it was really about the intolerable depravity of slavery. A hundred years later, the mysterious inversions of history converted the old slaver’s party into the Civil Rights party. That had a good fifty-year run. It included a hearty side-dish of anti-war sentiment, and a general disposition against the Big Brother treatment of citizens, including especially the overreach of the CIA and the FBI.

What is the Democratic Party today? Well, it’s the cheerleading squad for “seventeen” government agencies that add up to the craftily-labeled “intel community,” a warm-and-fuzzy coalition of snoops, false witnesses, rogue lawfare cadres, seditionists, and bad-faith artists working sedulously to hide their previous misdeeds with ever-fresh ones. They’re the party against free speech, the party against due process of law, the party determined to provoke a war with Russia. They’re the party of sexual confusion, sexual hysteria, and sexual conflict, the party of kangaroo courts, cancel culture, erasing boundaries (including national borders), and of making up rules for all that as they go along — like the Nazis and Soviets used to do. The ideas and policies they advocate are so comprehensively crazy that their old support of slavery looks quaintly straightforward in comparison.

It’s taken a while for the full efflorescence of these political pathologies to present. But now they are finally on display for all to see in what is supposed to be a climactic impeachment melodrama. The impeachment process itself has revealed the party’s genius for inventing new debaucheries of law and government misconduct — the latest being Rep Adam Schiff’s blatantly illegal cadging of his opponents’ phone logs. And now, after three years of unchallenged wickedness, they literally face the moment of truth.

That is when all the many players in this grand game of Gotcha have to face the consequences of what they have done. The Horowitz report is necessarily limited to the DOJ inspector general’s narrow mission scope: the IG can only interview current employees of the agency and its stepchild, the FBI, which means that key players in the Gotcha game such as former FBI director Comey, former acting director McCabe, fired special agent Peter Stzrok and notably ex-CIA director John Brennan were outside of Mr. Horowitz’s sphere of operations. His scope was also supposedly limited to the issues around FISA warrant mischief — though those complex shenanigans may have led the IG to other related dodges, cons, and crimes outright. The IG has no real law enforcement powers. He can only refer or recommend further action. Nevertheless, a great miasma of anxiety oppresses the Democratic Party now as it awaits whatever Mr. Horowitz has to say about these matters.

The party’s propaganda arms at The New York Times, the WashPo, and cable news networks worked up a frenzy of distractions and ruses this past week — for instance, the “bombshell” that International-Man-of-Mystery Joseph Mifsud was not a hireling of the FBI. Of course, nobody ever claimed he was. Rather, he is suspected of being an agent of the Italian intel service with links to British intel, both used by the CIA as beards for its nefarious activities around its own election meddling of 2016. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s Democratic caucus has been busy with ersatz impeachment proceedings, which are invidiously scheduled to continue next week as a smokescreen to conceal the Horowitz findings. It’s been a frantic campaign for them at a fraught moment in this long saga — but the odor of desperation is thick and rank.

Of course, behind the Horowitz report loom the specters of Barr & Durham. Whatever they’ve been up to has been hermetically sealed in a globe of silence even more oppressive and nightmarish for the Dems than the IG’s inquiry. Barr & Durham are able to make things stick, most crucially genuine criminal culpability for the entire RussiaGate fiasco and all of its offshoots, including the most recent “Whistleblower” caper — a patently treasonous scheme. Who knows if and when indictments start raining down, but there’s a chance that it will be a very hard rain indeed.

I’m not so sure that the Democratic Party can survive the washing away of its beloved narrative by that hard rain.

They are also faced with a field of manifestly lame presidential candidates, especially the current leader of the pack, Joe Biden, fumbling and doddering his way down the campaign trail in an apparent effort to dodge being investigated for the grifts of his Veep years. All this may be enough to put the party down, like a dog that has peed on the carpet one time too many. Somebody else, from some other hastily assembled party, may have to stand against Mr. Trump in 2020. Source

Let Me Make This Abundantly Clear. (I Am Apolitical) While I Have a General Distaste for Politicians No Matter the Party They Belong To, I Am Unashamedly Politically a Bible Believing Conservative Christian. I Have a Severe Distrust of Government. I Believe It Is the Most Inefficient and Ineffective Way to Accomplish Most Things. While I Strongly Disagree with Liberals/Progressives and Conservative on Most Political Issues, and While I Believe Liberals/Progressives and Most Politicians Are Terribly Misguided and Naive About What Big Government Will Eventually Result In, I Strive to Not Question Their Motives. at the Same Time, While I Find Myself in Agreement with Conservative Politicians on Some Issues, I Do Not Believe Electing Republicans Is the Answer to Everything. for Me, Very Sadly, the Main Difference Between Republicans and Democrats Is How Quickly They Want to Drive the Car Towards the Cliff. Simply Put, I Do Not Believe the Government Is the Solution for Everything. I Do Not Place Any Faith, Trust, or Hope in Any Politicians to Fix What Is Wrong with the World. “Come Lord Jesus!” (Revelation 22:20) The prophet does not confuse truth with consensus. The prophet does not confuse God’s word with the word of those who happen to hold power at present, or with the opinion of the majority. This is because powerholders and the majority can fall victim to a lying spirit-and this means a power that actually seizes the majority of experts, the political leadership, and the public.StevieRay Hansen

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

Democrats Getting ‘Cold Feet’ As Impeachment Support Evaporates…

After weeks of secret impeachment testimony followed by public testimony from House Democrats’ cherry-picked witnesses, support for impeaching President Trump is sinking.

While witnesses have testified that Trump requested Ukraine investigate former VP Joe Biden for corruption, support for impeachment has decreased significantly, while opposition has increased

According to the FiveThirtyEight average of national polls, support for impeachment has shrunk from 50.3 percent in mid-October to 46.3 percent presently, while opposition has risen from 43.8 percent to 45.6 percent.

Among independents in the FiveThirtyEight average, support for impeachment topped out at 47.7 percent in late October but has sunk to 41 percent over the past three weeks. –The Hill

“After three years, the country was sick of hearing about Russia, and now the average American either doesn’t understand or doesn’t care about the case we’re making on Ukraine,” one Democratic fundraiser told The Hill.

Another poll registering declining support for impeachment is YouGov, which has independent support dropping from 39% weeks ago to 35%, while opposition has grown from 35% to 40%.

Benny@bennyjohnsonReplying to @bennyjohnson

“American public loses enthusiasm for impeachment despite blockbuster hearings”

Emerson Poll:

October:
• Support: 48%
• Oppose: 44%

Nov. 17- Nov 20:
•Support: 43%
• Oppose: 45%

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/11/23/american-public-loses-enthusiasm-impeachment-despite-blockbuster/ …American public loses enthusiasm for impeachment despite blockbuster hearingsDemocrats hoped it would be the week that Donald Trump was hoist with his own petard.telegraph.co.uk5109:10 AM – Nov 24, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy165 people are talking about this

Impeachment support began fading during the House hearings, with a POLITICO/Morning Consult Poll from last week revealing a 2% decline in support and a 3% increase in opposition to the inquiry.

Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump

Polls have now turned very strongly against Impeachment, especially in swing states. 75% to 25%. Thank you!119K6:34 AM – Nov 24, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy47.4K people are talking about this

And according to the Washington Post‘s Rachael Bade, some moderate Democratic lawmakers are now getting “cold feet.”

RNC Research@RNCResearch

WaPo’s Bade: some Democrats getting “cold feet” as worries grow about public opposition to impeachmenthttps://youtu.be/OU7f8wHDngc 2,3888:51 AM – Nov 24, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy1,031 people are talking about this

Schiff, meanwhile, swears it’s not true! 

Benny@bennyjohnson

Adam Schiff says that public support for impeachment has grown dramatically in the past two months.

He conveniently left out the polls from this week showing a decrease in support, especially among independents, after finally allowing public testimonies.5,6719:10 AM – Nov 24, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy2,387 people are talking about this

Whatever the case, according to Rep. Eric Swalwell, who farted on live TV last week,  “I’m not focused on the polls, I know my colleagues aren’t either… this president used his great vast power to ask a foreign government to help him cheat an election,” Source

Let Me Make This Abundantly Clear. (I Am Apolitical) While I Have a General Distaste for Electric Cars and Politicians No Matter the Party They Belong To, I Am Unashamedly Politically a Bible Believing Conservative Christian. I Have a Severe Distrust of Government. I Believe It Is the Most Inefficient and Ineffective Way to Accomplish Most Things. While I Strongly Disagree with Liberals/Progressives and Conservative on Most Political Issues, and While I Believe Liberals/Progressives and Most Politicians Are Terribly Misguided and Naive About What Big Government Will Eventually Result In, I Strive to Not Question Their Motives. at the Same Time, While I Find Myself in Agreement with Conservative Politicians on Some Issues, I Do Not Believe Electing Republicans Is the Answer to Everything. for Me, Very Sadly, the Main Difference Between Republicans and Democrats Is How Quickly They Want to Drive the Car Towards the Cliff. Simply Put, I Do Not Believe the Government Is the Solution for Everything. I Do Not Place Any Faith, Trust, or Hope in Any Politicians to Fix What Is Wrong with the World. “Come Lord Jesus!” (Revelation 22:20) The prophet does not confuse truth with consensus. The prophet does not confuse God’s word with the word of those who happen to hold power at present, or with the opinion of the majority. This is because powerholders and the majority can fall victim to a lying spirit-and this means a power that actually seizes the majority of experts, the political leadership, and the public.StevieRay Hansen

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

 “Top 10” list of “asinine” Democrat attacks on Trump is as follows… Schiff would have you believe, this time is different – “we gotcha “

HNewsWire Logo top Menu
  1. Trump is a long-time Russian agent, as described in the Steele dossier.
  2. The Russians gave Trump advance access to emails stolen from the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign.
  3. The Trump campaign based some of its activities on these stolen documents.
  4. Trump received nefarious materials from the Russians through a Trump Campaign aide.
  5. Trump laundered Russian money through real estate deals.
  6. Trump was blackmailed by Russia through his financial exposure with Deutsche Bank.
  7. Trump had a diabolical plan to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.
  8. Trump changed the Republican National Committee platform to hurt Ukraine and benefit Russia.
  9. The Russians laundered money through the NRA for the Trump campaign.
  10. Trump’s son in law lied about his Russian contacts while obtaining his security clearance

“It’s a long list of false charges, all false, and I can go on and on and on,” Nunes concluded.

“In their mania to attack the president, no conspiracy theory is too outlandish for the Democrats.”

Those were the ‘fighting’ words of a clearly frustrated Rep. Devin Nunes as he addressed the American public ahead of today’s latest round of farcical impeachment circus shenanigans.

With Democrats yawningly repeating endless hearsay and opinion as ‘fact’, Nunes – in a few brief minutes – exposed the whole house of cards by laying out succinctly the ‘facts’ of what Democrats have tried to pull in the last three years:

“Time and again, they floated the possibility of some far-fetched malfeasance by Trump, declared the dire need to investigate it, and then suddenly dropped the issue and moved on to their next asinine theory”

But, as Schiff would have you believe, this time is different – “we gotcha”. Source

Let Me Make This Abundantly Clear. (I Am Apolitical) While I Have a General Distaste for Politicians No Matter the Party They Belong To, I Am Unashamedly Politically a Bible Believing Conservative Christian. I Have a Severe Distrust of Government. I Believe It Is the Most Inefficient and Ineffective Way to Accomplish Most Things. While I Strongly Disagree with Liberals/Progressives and Conservative on Most Political Issues, and While I Believe Liberals/Progressives and Most Politicians Are Terribly Misguided and Naive About What Big Government Will Eventually Result In, I Strive to Not Question Their Motives. at the Same Time, While I Find Myself in Agreement with Conservative Politicians on Some Issues, I Do Not Believe Electing Republicans Is the Answer to Everything. for Me, Very Sadly, the Main Difference Between Republicans and Democrats Is How Quickly They Want to Drive the Car Towards the Cliff. Simply Put, I Do Not Believe the Government Is the Solution for Everything. I Do Not Place Any Faith, Trust, or Hope in Any Politicians to Fix What Is Wrong with the World. “Come Lord Jesus!” (Revelation 22:20) StevieRay Hansen

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

Support for the Democrats’ partisan impeachment inquiry is dropping and the opposition is growing among independent voters, a Politico-Morning Consult poll released Tuesday revealed.

The poll, released at the beginning of the second week of the House Intelligence Committee’s public impeachment hearings, shows that public support for impeachment, particularly among independents, is dropping hard and fast.

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS - NOVEMBER 13: Live testimony of the House impeachment hearings against President Donald Trump is shown on a television at the Billy Goat Tavern on November 13, 2019 in Chicago, Illinois. In the first public impeachment hearings in more than two decades, House Democrats are making a case …
Scott Olson/Getty Images

The poll, released at the beginning of the second week of the House Intelligence Committee’s public impeachment hearings, shows that public support for impeachment, particularly among independents, is dropping hard and fast.

The survey was taken November 15-17 among 1,994 registered voters and found that 47 percent of independents actively oppose the impeachment inquiry. This figure is a 10-point increase from last week, as noted by the Hill.

The risk of loss in trading futures and options on futures can be substantial. The author does not guarantee the accuracy of the above information, although it is believed that the sources are reliable and the information accurate. The author assumes no liability or responsibility for direct or indirect, special, consequential or incidental damages or for any other damages relating or arising out of any action taken as a result of any information or advice contained in this commentary. The author disclaims any express or implied liability or responsibility for any action taken, which is solely at the liability and responsibility of the user. Steve Meyers

Independent support for the inquiry fell to 40 percent – a seven-point drop.

Overall, support for the inquiry dropped by two points and opposition grew by three points.

Respondents across the board were asked, “Do you support or oppose the current impeachment inquiry into President Trump?” Of those surveyed, 38 percent said they “strongly support” the effort, and another 38 percent said they “strongly oppose” it. Another 10 percent said they “somewhat support” the inquiry, seven percent said they “somewhat oppose” it, and eight percent indicated that they did not know or did not hold an opinion.

Meanwhile, 42 percent of respondents said they “strongly approve” or “somewhat approve” of the way House Democrats are handling the current impeachment inquiry, while 46 percent said they “strongly disapprove” or “somewhat disapprove.” The margin of error is +/- 2 percentage points. Source

Let Me Make This Abundantly Clear. (I Am Apolitical) While I Have a General Distaste for Politicians No Matter the Party They Belong To, I Am Unashamedly Politically a Bible Believing Conservative Christian. I Have a Severe Distrust of Government. I Believe It Is the Most Inefficient and Ineffective Way to Accomplish Most Things. While I Strongly Disagree with Liberals/Progressives and Conservative on Most Political Issues, and While I Believe Liberals/Progressives and Most Politicians Are Terribly Misguided and Naive About What Big Government Will Eventually Result In, I Strive to Not Question Their Motives. at the Same Time, While I Find Myself in Agreement with Conservative Politicians on Some Issues, I Do Not Believe Electing Republicans Is the Answer to Everything. for Me, Very Sadly, the Main Difference Between Republicans and Democrats Is How Quickly They Want to Drive the Car Towards the Cliff. Simply Put, I Do Not Believe the Government Is the Solution for Everything. I Do Not Place Any Faith, Trust, or Hope in Any Politicians to Fix What Is Wrong with the World. “Come Lord Jesus!” (Revelation 22:20) StevieRay Hansen

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

Even The Least Trusted Name In News Is Bailing On Adam Schiff’s Impeachment Nonsense 

When CNN starts to pull support from a liberal Trump-hater, you know it’s bad.

Adam Schiff is on a whole different planet with this impeachment nonsense.

This network will support virtually anything that is anti-Trump and they still can’t seem to buy the BS that Schiff is shoveling.

Here’s more from Gateway Pundit:

You know it’s bad when CNN admits Schiff bombed today.

CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin admitted Wednesday afternoon that the two-star witnesses Schiff rolled out on day one of his impeachment show trials never even had direct contact with President Trump.

The two Trump-hating witnesses, George Kent, a deputy at the State Department and Bill Taylor, the charge d’affaires at the US Embassy in Kiev testified together on Wednesday.

The two anti-Trump witnesses admitted to Congressman Jim Jordan that they’ve never even spoken to President Trump — all of their information was based on second and third-hand chatter.

Watch both of Schiff’s witnesses, George Kent and Bill Taylor also admit they were never even on the July 25 Trump-Zelensky phone call:

Mark Bednar@MarkBednar

WATCH:

Both Taylor & Kent reaffirm they were NOT on the July 25th call.3611:18 AM – Nov 13, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy29 people are talking about this

CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin said Wednesday that neither witness had direct contact with the president.

“The one criticism of these two witnesses, which I think is very much legitimate…Is that neither of them had contact with the President — EVER — and yeah, that’s a problem if you’re going to impeach the president,” Toobin said.

WATCH:

Steve Guest@SteveGuest

Adam Schiff has lost CNN:

CNN’s Toobin: neither witness “had direct contact with the president…that’s a problem” 1,2103:56 PM – Nov 13, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy781 people are talking about this

Of course, this is a problem for impeachment.

Former special prosecutor Ken Starr said Wednesday of the two witnesses who testified based on second and third-hand information, that it is all just hearsay and not even admissible in a court of law.

CNN isn’t exactly the most trusted name in news, and never was, so if they have problems with this circus then there is little hope for Schiff.

Again this is CNN we are talking about.

Still, Schiff seems to be trying to hold to his story.

I can’t wait for all of this to unravel.

CNN seems to be making the prudent move, for once and distancing itself from the lies before this latest shamgate blows apart like the others. Source

Read More Censored News

Let Me Make This Abundantly Clear. (I Am Apolitical) While I Have a General Distaste for Politicians No Matter the Party They Belong To, I Am Unashamedly Politically a Bible Believing Conservative Christian. I Have a Severe Distrust of Government. I Believe It Is the Most Inefficient and Ineffective Way to Accomplish Most Things. While I Strongly Disagree with Liberals/Progressives and Conservative on Most Political Issues, and While I Believe Liberals/Progressives and Most Politicians Are Terribly Misguided and Naive About What Big Government Will Eventually Result In, I Strive to Not Question Their Motives. at the Same Time, While I Find Myself in Agreement with Conservative Politicians on Some Issues, I Do Not Believe Electing Republicans Is the Answer to Everything. for Me, Very Sadly, the Main Difference Between Republicans and Democrats Is How Quickly They Want to Drive the Car Towards the Cliff. Simply Put, I Do Not Believe the Government Is the Solution for Everything. I Do Not Place Any Faith, Trust, or Hope in Any Politicians to Fix What Is Wrong with the World. “Come Lord Jesus!” (Revelation 22:20) StevieRay Hansen

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

 Digging into the WHYs of Adam Schiff, a guy whose friends include Ed Buck, suspected of murder and drug overdosing homeless bums in the West Hollywood district Schiff calls home (most importantly, why was Adam at this drug den more than 15 times??).  With such a case pending against you, as to why this Ed Buck was your friend and major political donor, it would be baffling why Schiff is so brazen with his public lies, aggressive “Fact-less” attacks on innocent President Donald Trump.  Does he have a death wish?  Just a quick comment on FACTS of this case, there isn’t a single shred of evidence that Trump did anything wrong.  Ukraine officials including Zelensky himself said that there was no quid pro quo.  “Hearsay” is not evidence, what we have is a poorly planned Coup d’état by the Establishment that doesn’t like Trump basically because he can’t be corrupted and he won’t do their bidding.  With all the President’s flaws, including his egomaniac personality, bad sense of humor, and we can go on here – he’s 100x better President and more Presidential than any career politician: And he’s a former TV actor (according to his role as actor in a TV series where his catchphrase was “You’re Fired”).  This guy should not be President!  It’s a shame to all the politicians before him, they should be ashamed of themselves, but they have no shame.  How is a guy with no training able to do a better job while putting up with such abuse as the ‘witch hunt’ fake impeachment hearings, constant harassment from the media and sometimes even his own advisors!

The WHY Schiff is so brazen and reckless

The simple answer as to WHY Schiff is so aggressive is because Soros is behind him:

Rep. Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, was previously financially aided by the George Soros-financed MoveOn.org to win his Congressional seat.  Schiff was also awarded the Toll Fellowship, which is sponsored by the Council of State Governments, a nonprofit that monitors federal government activities and is heavily financed by Soros’s Open Society Foundations.  The Open Society and Soros-funded groups have additionally supported a number of Schiff’s legislative efforts.

Is George Soros pulling the strings?  What do you think, based on the facts:

When Schiff ran against incumbent Republican Jim Rogan in 2000, his campaign was given more than $100,000 by the Soros-funded site. Schiff was also given the Toll Fellowship, which is sponsored by Council of State Governments, a non-profit that is also heavily funded by Soros’s  Open Society Foundations.  Does Soros really run the show for Schiff?

I’m sure that many a TV watcher will have to strain themselves to figure this one out, hopefully, they won’t get a hernia in the process.  For those who see what’s really going on, Soros has a long history of financing leftist radical movements through his “Open Society” foundation and working hand in hand with the CIA.  This idea was originally floated in 2017 right here on ZH:

John F. Kennedy’s Battle with the CIA

Donald Trump is the first president since John F. Kennedy to openly take on the CIA.

After being suckered into the Bay of Pigs disaster in Cuba, JFK said he wanted “to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds.”

Kennedy fired CIA Director Allen Dulles. But that was about as far as he got.

JFK, of course, failed to break the Deep State’s grasp on power. In an ironic twist, Allen Dulles would later be appointed to the Warren Commission to investigate Kennedy’s assassination.

The CIA is the undisputed all-time world champion of orchestrating coups. And right now, Trump is squarely on its radar…

The above article was written 2 years ago and deserves a RE-READ for a frame of reference, it’s playing out just as expected.  Russia-hoax failed, now it’s Ukraine-gate and the blame Trump for what the Bidens did but worse bs nonsense, but this time they are playing Big Top circus in front of the grand theater in the home of every American, the TV.  The Elite and especially Soros know how TV is key to controlling a large swath of the US population, who is completely naive and open to it’s fully subjective powers.  They control the media but they knew that the current TV show circus is the only ‘fake trial’ that people would take seriously.  This is the death of Trump – any assassination or forced military coup would have likely unleashed a civil war or worse, a breakup of the United States of America (NOTE FOR FOLKS LIVING IN CITIES – There are red states!).  

As explained in Splitting Pennies – the world is not as it seems.

This show circus is really about one thing: Selling the American people on Mafia control of the USA, the same group that killed Kennedy is now cornered like a wild rabid cat.  If they can get people to buy this fake trial based on fake evidence with fake witnesses, who are ‘witnesses’ while they are getting paid by (Democrats) in the same time!  This isn’t a ‘kangaroo court’ this is a sham, a lie, a complete fake witch hunt based on fears of the Elite that they will lose control (at least to say COMPLETE control) of the American mind.  Prior to the Trump victory, decisions were made for people remotely.  Like a TV remote control button, bubbles could be created and popped.  Corruption, cronyism, and outright theft of state assets were at their peak during Obama, as we are seeing the evidence rise to the surface like feces in an open Indian street toilet.  James Howard Kunstler, the most epic wordsmith of our time, doesn’t have the English words to enunciate the absurdity of this situation.  Congress, the US Constitution, and all the other branches of trees you learn about in Civics class have all been thrown out the window and into the pile of rotting toxic waste this country has become.

Soros is a true puppet master, unlike the world, has ever seen.  But no one will ever be able to document his evil deeds as he likely has destroyed all the evidence.  But we can see the actions of the NGOs, reports from other countries, and can connect the dots; such as this report from ForeignPolicy.com: 

The protests in Bucharest, sparked by dead-of-night legislation aimed at decriminalizing corruption, were the largest the country had seen since the fall of communism in 1989. Romania TV — a channel associated with, if not officially owned by, the government — alleged the protesters were paid. “Adults were paid 100 lei [$24], children earned 50 lei [$12.30], and dogs were paid 30 lei [$7.20],” one broadcaster said. Some protesters responded by fitting their dogs with placards; others tucked money into their pets’ coats. One dog stood next to a sign reading, “Can anyone change 30 lei into euro?” Another dog wore one that read: “George Soros paid me to be here.”

And, just like in multiple foreign attempted coups he paid for and organized, he’s now doing it in the US, CIA style.  And like a Forbes.com article says, it’s sometimes difficult to differentiate between US Foreign Policy (CIA) and George Soros.

The interesting thing about the Trump takedown is that starting in 2016 this is the first time that both Soros and the CIA were active on the US Homeland.  Never before had the US attempted to openly manipulate its own elections and create a plot in case (Democrats) lost in order to regain power?  But it’s from the CIA playbook and this is something the US has done, and Soros has done, in hundreds of countries.  Hundreds – not a ‘few’ but Hundreds.  

Like other immigrant idiots that migrate to the U.S. and play in the victim, these are the worst Americans.  And while we’re breaching that subject, is it not unreasonable to have a limitation that if you are a US Congressman you can only be a US Citizen?  In law, or in banking – that would be what’s known as a ‘conflict of interest’ – that is – writing the laws of one country when you are the citizen of another.  And it’s not just Shitty Schiff – there’s a whole host of them, see here:

What a surprise, Charles Schumer, Carl Levin, Barney Frank, Adam Schiff – and almost all Democrats!  Any connection here, or again, these are all just coincidences – it’s perfectly normal in America where foreigners with foreign citizenships NOT ONLY make our laws but can impeach a president with NO EVIDENCE.  And the sad part is that people are buying this hook line and sinker like a late-night infomercial selling pills to make you lose 50 pounds in minutes.

And we all know where Soros loyalties are.  And they aren’t to the USA.  Isn’t it interesting how genetics and religion play such a big role in forming your opinions?

Despite the religious controversy, Shahak published his account of the religiously-denied telephone in the first chapter of Jewish History, Jewish Religion (1994), and said that “neither the Israeli, nor the diaspora rabbinical authorities ever reversed their ruling that a Jew should not violate the Sabbath in order to save the life of a Gentile. They added much sanctimonious twaddle to the effect that, if the consequence of such an act puts Jews in danger, the violation of the Sabbath is permitted, for their sake.”[23]

For those who watch TV, it’s important to understand how the dual citizen members of Congress treat the rest of us, Goy, even in a formal legal setting such as the US Congress.  Anyone who has Israeli citizenship obviously takes this stuff seriously, there are millions of Jews living in the US that don’t care and they are really nice honest people, and some of them really funny! 

The risk of loss in trading futures and options on futures can be substantial. The author does not guarantee the accuracy of the above information, although it is believed that the sources are reliable and the information accurate. The author assumes no liability or responsibility for direct or indirect, special, consequential or incidental damages or for any other damages relating or arising out of any action taken as a result of any information or advice contained in this commentary. The author disclaims any express or implied liability or responsibility for any action taken, which is solely at the liability and responsibility of the user. Steve Meyers

These screens like Schiff don’t take Congress seriously, it’s a means to an end.  This circus is a disrespect to the USA and everything that has been built in our short history.  Furthermore, it’s shameful that this hasn’t been stopped earlier in its tracks like most hearsay cases would be.  But that’s not surprising, with a fake generation growing up scrolling on the fake book all day, drugged up on Prozac alternatives – introduce gender confusion and you have one confused f**ked up a generation! 

It’s not likely that an Impeachment can succeed, but the fact that a fake trial can go so far based on Soros and his pawns – should be shocking to every person living in America whether you are legal or illegal.  The reason is that when the mafia rules a government, whether it be the Italian mafia or the Jewish mafia- you’re always one step away from disaster.  What happened in Russia during the Stalin years was horrific, Stalin killed significantly more people than Hitler but what was unique about Stalin most of them were his own people, including his best friend!  He was paranoid and thought it was good ‘for security’- anyway what’s going to happen in 20 years if mob rule continues, with no respect for rules and laws?  Who will take over after George Soros leaves us?  His gender-confused kids?  Or will power shift into someone more aggressive than George, who is less philosophical and more ‘practical’ – and would usher in a new Holocaust.  That’s what kind of fire the Israeli’s are playing within Congress, and they don’t even know it.  That’s what created Hitler and what created the Holocaust, let’s not forget (as the billboards remind us here in South Carolina):

Under the Weimar Republic, 1919–1933, German Jews played a major role in politics and diplomacy for the first time in their history, and they strengthened their position in financial, economic, and cultural affairs.[53][54] Hugo Preuß was Interior Minister under the first post-imperial regime and wrote the first draft of the liberal Weimar Constitution.[55] Walther Rathenau, the chairman of General Electric (AEG) and head of the German Democratic Party (DDP), served as foreign minister in 1922, when he negotiated the important Treaty of Rapallo. He was assassinated two months later.[56]

Already by 1914, the Jews were well represented among the wealthy, including 24 percent of the richest men in Prussia, and eight percent of the university students.[57]

Now we have foreign citizens in the USA creating laws for US citizens (who don’t have the luxury to bail to another country – our skin is in the game theirs isn’t) AND attempting to kick out a legally elected American (single US Citizen only) Donald Trump.  And the reason that justifies the impeachment?  He was digging into their corrupt practices under the previous administration, exactly why he was elected.

Is there any intelligent comment the Democrats can make, other than childish idiotic slurs like “Orange Pig” ?  Since when did politics degrade from debate to the schoolyard, the intellectual debate has been replaced with the food fight, which finally led to the feces fight.  It’s enough!  Can someone please stop these idiots?  Source

Let Me Make This Abundantly Clear. (I Am Apolitical) While I Have a General Distaste for Politicians No Matter the Party They Belong To, I Am Unashamedly Politically a Bible Believing Conservative Christian. I Have a Severe Distrust of Government. I Believe It Is the Most Inefficient and Ineffective Way to Accomplish Most Things. While I Strongly Disagree with Liberals/Progressives and Conservative on Most Political Issues, and While I Believe Liberals/Progressives and Most Politicians Are Terribly Misguided and Naive About What Big Government Will Eventually Result In, I Strive to Not Question Their Motives. at the Same Time, While I Find Myself in Agreement with Conservative Politicians on Some Issues, I Do Not Believe Electing Republicans Is the Answer to Everything. for Me, Very Sadly, the Main Difference Between Republicans and Democrats Is How Quickly They Want to Drive the Car Towards the Cliff. Simply Put, I Do Not Believe the Government Is the Solution for Everything. I Do Not Place Any Faith, Trust, or Hope in Any Politicians to Fix What Is Wrong with the World. “Come Lord Jesus!” (Revelation 22:20) StevieRay Hansen

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

Alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella was Biden guest at State Department banquet

Eric Ciaramella, the alleged Ukraine whistleblower, was a guest of Vice President Joe Biden at a glitzy lunch in October 2016 to honor the prime minister of Italy.

Biden co-hosted the banquet with former Secretary of State John Kerry for then-Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. Ciaramella, who is of Italian heritage, was among the U.S. officials who accepted an invitation. This week, the Washington Examiner reported that Ciaramella is now a deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council, reporting to the director of national intelligence.

Ciaramella, a career CIA analyst, was Ukraine director on the National Security Council during the end of the Obama administration and remained there during the early months of the Trump administration when he was briefly acting senior director for European and Russian affairs. He is now accused of being the official who filed a complaint about a July 25 phone call in which President Trump urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to look into a conspiracy theory regarding CrowdStrike and investigate Biden, a Democratic candidate for president in 2020, in relation to his son Hunter’s business dealings in Ukraine.

The complaint sparked concerns about the potential abuse of power and led to impeachment proceedings in the Democrat-controlled House in which witnesses have said they believe Trump held out on meeting with Zelensky and congressionally-approved military aid in exchange for political favors.

00:3800:48

Ciaramella, 33, is listed among dozens of other people who were invited to the October 2016 event hosted by Biden under the category “WH EOVP,” or the White House Executive Office of the Vice President, in an unclassified State Department document released through the Freedom of Information Act. An “A” appears next to his name, indicating he accepted the invitation.

On Oct. 6, the Washington Examiner reported the whistleblower worked with Biden during the Obama administration and is a career CIA analyst with deep expertise in Ukraine policy.

John Kerry,Matteo Renzi,Joe Biden
Secretary of State John Kerry, center, flanked by Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, left, and Vice President Joe Biden, speaks during a luncheon in the prime minister’s honor, Tuesday, Oct. 18, 2016, in the State Department.

Out of over 400 possible guests for the State Department event, 115 people were listed as having accepted invitations, although key Trump-Russia investigation figures such as former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey, former National Intelligence Director James Clapper, and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch all declined their invitations, according to the guest list. Other notable figures such as then-House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, former House Speaker Paul Ryan, then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, John and Tony Podesta, Colin Powell, and Condoleezza Rice received invitations too.

Besides inviting Ciaramella, Biden’s office, as opposed to the State Department or another entity, sent invitations to more than thirty other people, including Obama press secretary Josh Earnest, Obama senior adviser Valerie Jarrett, Obama Homeland Security adviser Lisa Monaco, Obama speechwriter Ben Rhodes, and Obama national security adviser Susan Rice.

RealClearInvestigations named Ciaramella as the whistleblower last week. The report cites U.S. officials who said the invite to Ciaramella, “a relatively low-level GS-13 federal employee, was unusual and signaled he was politically connected inside the Obama White House.”

While Trump and his allies have called for the whistleblower to be identified, the whistleblower’s lawyers and Democrats argue that the person’s identity no longer matters. Still, Ciaramella’s name has been invoked by GOP investigators as they question impeachment witnesses, getting his name on record.

Both Trump and his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, claim Biden improperly used his role as vice president to pressure Ukraine to fire former top prosecutor Viktor Shokin, who was widely seen as corrupt, in 2016 to protect his son from an investigation into Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company at which the younger Biden held a $50,000-per-month position on the board. This stems from a 2018 video showing the elder Biden bragging about threatening to hold back $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees if Ukraine did not terminate Shokin from his post.

But the European Union, the International Monetary Fund, and other allies had the same objective, and Biden was repeating U.S. policy that had been set out by Washington’s ambassador to Kyiv in the preceding months and was briefed by White House staff just ahead of the trip. Biden has accused Giuliani of spreading “false, debunked conspiracy theories” about him as he seeks the presidency.

Having taken a leading role in the Obama administration’s dealings with Ukraine, Biden made six trips to the Eastern European country in eight years, including 2009, 2014, and late 2015. The last trip took place in January 2017. At the time, White House officials said the trip was to reinforce U.S. backing for Ukraine while the world prepared for the inauguration of Trump, who was expected to bring a pro-Russia stance to office days later.

Andrew Bakaj and Mark Zaid, lawyers for the whistleblower, refuse to confirm the identity of their client even as such high-profile figures as Donald Trump Jr. have named Ciaramella as the whistleblower.

“Identifying any suspected name for the whistleblower will place their family at risk of serious harm. We will not confirm or deny any name that is published or promoted by supporters of the president. Disclosure of any name undermines the integrity of the whistleblower system and will deter any future whistleblowers,” they said in a statement Wednesday. “We will note, however, that publication or promotion of a name shows the desperation to deflect from the substance of the whistleblower complaint. It will not relieve the president of the need to address the substantive allegation, all of which have been substantially proven to be true.”

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has faced criticism after it was revealed the whistleblower met with an intelligence panel aide seeking guidance before filing a complaint about Trump’s Ukraine communications with the Intelligence Community inspector general, and Schiff knew about it but did not immediately inform his Republican colleagues on his panel.

The Washington Examiner has reported that two ex-NSC staffers are now employed by Schiff. Abigail Grace, who worked at the NSC until 2018, was hired in February, while Sean Misko, an NSC aide until 2017, joined Schiff’s committee staff in August, the same month the whistleblower submitted his complaint. Source

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

He’d qualify as a traffic court judge maybe, FNC’s Napolitano: Trump Demanding Favor to Releasing Funds ‘Clearly Violation’ of a Criminal Bribery Laws

On Wednesday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “Your World,” network senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said today during the impeachment hearings Democrats established President Donald Trump’s failure to release the money to the Ukraine that Congress ordered released until a favor was received is bribery.

Napolitano Dismisses GOP Defense of Trump - ‘It’s Clearly Impeachable’

Napolitano said, “The Democrats established conclusively the aid was held up in return for political favor.”

He continued, “The failure to perform an affirmative duty— releasing money the Congress ordered released — until favor is received, whether the favor comes or not, is bribery.”

He added, “I think that the argument that asking for a favor in return for doing a legal obligation — releasing the funds — is pretty clearly a violation of criminal bribery laws. Republicans may not want to acknowledge that, which is why they’d rather undermine the witnesses than address the merits.”

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

The Democrats Are on Dangerous Ground, Messing with God Elected can be Deadly, We May Not like MR. Trump, but It’s Obvious He Was Hand-Picked by God Almighty and No Amount of Resistance Will Change That Fact, It’s Showtime. Our government has been overthrown…

Democrat Dud: First Public Impeachment Hearing Falls Short as ‘Complicated,’ Unclear Allegations Drive Inquiry Forward

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 13: Top U.S. diplomat to Ukraine, William B. Taylor Jr. testifies before the House Intelligence Committee in the Longworth House Office Building on Capitol Hill November 13, 2019 in Washington, DC. In the first public impeachment hearings in more than two decades, House Democrats are trying …
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

MATTHEW BOYLE13 Nov 2019Washington, D.C.4734:23

House Democrats’ first impeachment inquiry public hearing on Wednesday was widely panned as the two career diplomats who testified failed to offer clear allegations of wrongdoing against President Donald Trump, and Democrats running the show found themselves on defense in response to the Republicans in the minority who were aggressive and effective in pushing their counter-narrative.

“It was a total disaster for us,” one senior House Democrat aide told Breitbart News.

“Too complicated,” another Democrat aide said.

“This won’t make sense to regular people,” a third Democrat aide told Breitbart News.

Wednesday marked the first public hearing of the Democrats’ formal impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. The hearing opened slowly, taking 93 minutes for the panel’s chairman Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and it’s ranking member Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) as well as the two witnesses Bill Taylor and George Kent to get through their opening statements.

Taylor’s opening statement, which he read in its entirety, was 20-pages-long and contained lots of unclear background information. Kent’s, which was nearly as long and winding, contained numerous history lessons about Europeans helping Americans in the Revolutionary War.

The White House was clearly pleased with the lackluster performance by Democrats on Wednesday, as evidenced by two tweets from White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham:

Stephanie Grisham@PressSec

This sham hearing is not only boring, but it is also a colossal waste of taxpayer time & money. Congress should be working on passing USMCA, funding our govt & military, working on reduced drug pricing & so much more. @realDonaldTrump is working right now-the Dems should follow his lead!23.3K10:54 AM – Nov 13, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy17.9K people are talking about this

Stephanie Grisham@PressSec

Dems star witnesses can’t provide any first-hand knowledge of any wrongdoing by @POTUS. Their own testimony contradicts the Dems false quid pro quo narrative. These are essentially two bureaucrats with a foreign policy gripe.8,68612:14 PM – Nov 13, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy4,041 people are talking about this

A senior administration official told Breitbart News, too, that the Democrats have made a “colossal political mistake” by proceeding with this impeachment push despite the weakness of their case. While Republicans had been focused on process over substance, now with this first public hearing the White House believes the Democrats’ case has been “exposed” as being “extremely weak.”

“The White House is very upbeat about how the day went,” the senior administration official added, noting too that the Democrats’ star witnesses actually bolstered and strengthened White House and GOP arguments against impeachment by demonstrating there was no “quid pro quo” and that there is actual concern surrounding former Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden’s position on the board of Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma Holdings. In fact, Kent–one of the witnesses Democrats thought was their strongest–literally testified that he warned the Obama administration about these matters and Hunter Biden and, when pressed further, referred a GOP lawmaker to Joe Biden’s team for more information.

Jim Banks@RepJimBanks

George Kent testified that before Trump’s presidency he “and other US officials advocated reinstating an investigation of Burisma.”

So Kent did exactly what Dems are trying to impeach @realdonaldtrump for…37311:59 AM – Nov 13, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy230 people are talking about this

The post-game press conferences confirmed how bad the first day was for Democrats, as Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH)–who just joined the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) for these hearings–ripped into the media and the Democrats.

“The facts are the facts, and you guys can talk about it all you want to–and the Democrats can do what they want,” Jordan said. “But the facts will not change. And I think the American people clearly see that.”

WATCH: JIM JORDAN PRESS CONFERENCE AFTER FIRST  IMPEACHMENT HEARING:

Schiff’s post-game press conference, however, did not go so well:

Jim Banks@RepJimBanks

It appears today’s #ImpeachmentHearings went so badly Democrats are looking for a way out! https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1194725020662190080 …Tom Elliott@tomselliott“I’m reserving judgment on what should happen” — @RepAdamSchiff just now to reporters.1003:16 PM – Nov 13, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy54 people are talking about this

The Democrats do not seem to have moved any hearts or minds with Wednesday’s disjointed round one hearing, as evidenced by GOP unity at the end of the day, when Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX) pushed to try to bring in the so-called “whistleblower” for testimony. The vote failed, but along party lines with all 13 of the committee’s Democrats voting against the effort and all nine Republicans voting for it.

What’s more, several Republicans across Capitol Hill have now come out even more fervently defending the president. Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND), a top Trump ally, for instance, issued a blistering statement ripping Democrats for the gamesmanship.

Cramer said in a release:

These hearings are pointless.Today’s political theater in the House of Representatives is nothing more than an outward demonstration of their inward motivation to remove President Trump from office since the day he was elected. Democrats’ one-sided impeachment process is producing no persuasive substance; their only accomplishment is further dividing our country. It’s time for them to call it quits on this sham and to finally get to work on the important issues like passing USMCA, lowering prescription drug costs, and funding our nation’s military.

Nevertheless, despite the clear political loss on Wednesday, Schiff is persisting. The next hearings begin on Friday, and then next week there will be another round of public testimony. Source

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

Turley: House Dems Going on ‘Narrowest Basis for Impeachment’ in U.S. History

During CBS’ coverage of the impeachment hearing on Wednesday, George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley stated that while there is plenty in President Trump’s conduct to be upset over, House Democrats are “proceeding on the narrowest basis for impeachment in the history of this country.” He also expressed skepticism as to whether Democrats “gained a lot of ground” with regards to impeachment.

Turley said, “I think that there’s a lot to be outraged about. You certainly don’t need a crime for impeachment, but you do need clarity. And they’re proceeding on the narrowest basis for impeachment in the history of this country. We’ve never gone up with an impeachment just on abuse of power linked to a single controversy like this. That is a very slender basis. And I’m not too sure they gained a lot of ground on impeachment, as opposed to, all of this does not seem right to many of us. There’s a lot here that makes us all upset. But the question is, is this really an impeachable offense, and how do you distinguish what the president did here with what presidents do in conversations with heads of states?”

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

Because when it comes to the lawless, tyrannical Left, everything is staged. It’s all theater…

First Hour Fail: Democrats’ ‘Blockbuster’ Opening Hour Fizzles

Jim Lo Scalzo-Pool/Getty

Democrats opened public impeachment hearings on Wednesday promising to dramatically detail the case for the president’s impeachment, but there was little excitement in the first 93 minutes.

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff began the proceedings with a solemn statement recounting the events that sparked the impeachment inquiry.

Ambassador Bill Taylor and Deputy Assistant Secretary George Kent, the two bureaucrats selected by Schiff to kick off the public impeachment hearings also failed to deliver much drama.

Taylor and Kent began their statements recounting the history of diplomacy in the United States as well as the history of Ukraine and their lengthy careers of public service.

Both bureaucrats expressed their concerns about the president’s actions in Ukraine but proved that they were frequently alarmed and concerned but mostly did not have knowledge of the president’s motives.

Taylor read his 20-page opening statement, even admitting that although it was lengthy, he hoped Americans would recognize the importance of Ukraine in future diplomatic efforts.

Taylor said one of his staff claimed to overhear European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland discussing “the investigations” in a phone call with the president.

No members of Congress were allowed to interrupt the opening of the hearing with questions as the two diplomats droned on recounting their previously released public testimonies about the case.

Through a parliamentary inquiry, House Republicans successfully tripped up Rep. Adam Schiff to claim that he did not know the identity of the so-called “whistleblower,” despite reports that his committee had met with him prior to his claim.

President Trump shared a White House video on Twitter labeling the entire process as a “swamp” derived hoax. Source

The White House@WhiteHouse

New hoax. Same swamp.17.1K7:57 AM – Nov 13, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy11.9K people are talking about this

President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he was too busy to watch the first public impeachment hearing, as he hosted Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan at the White House.

“I’m too busy to watch it,” he said. “It’s a witch hunt, it’s a hoax, I’m too busy to watch it.”

Trump said that he would get briefed on the day’s testimony later in the day.

He commented that he had heard that Democrats were using “television lawyers” to question the witnesses at the hearing.

“I’m not surprised to see it, because Schiff can’t do his own questions,” he said.

Trump was referring to former MSNBC legal analyst Daniel Goldman, who Schiff recruited to conduct the examination of the witnesses Ambassador Bill Taylor and Deputy Assistant Secretary George Kent.

White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham called the hearing “boring.”

“This sham hearing is not only boring, but it is also a colossal waste of taxpayer time and money,” she wrote on Twitter.

House Democrats spent the first 93 minutes on opening statements before members of Congress could question the witnesses.

The White House also released a video at noon with the president declaring the investigation as the “single greatest scam in the history of American politics.”

He reminded supporters that Democrats wanted to take away their guns, health care, vote, freedom, and judges with the impeachment process.

“It’s all very simple, they’re trying to stop me because I am fighting for you and I will never let that happen,” Trump said. Source

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

And now the circus begins.

“What we will witness today is a televised, theatrical performance, staged by the Democrats.” – Rep. Devin Nunes.

“Guilty!” feature photo credit: NY Post, Nov. 13, 2019

In what looks like another clown show replay of the staged Kavanaugh hearings, Adam Schiff (Loonbag-CA) and the desperate Dems are now rolling out a full theatrical production of their non-impeachment impeachment, consisting of non-whistleblower whistleblowers who cite anonymous sources who have fourth-hand knowledge of other anonymous sources who claim President Trump pressured the worker at the 31 Flavors to give him free samples of ice cream.

Or something like that.

It’s all a clown show that reeks of the kind of putrid cocktail of desperation, tyranny, and lies that only Democrats can stir up like a left-leaning witches’ brew.

Watch Nunes’ opening statement here. It’s powerful:

Here’s how it’s all a clown show run by dishonest Dems

Why is this “impeachment” circus a clown show?

First, there’s the absurd idea that it’s somehow wrong for Trump to demand Ukraine investigate its own role in the 2016 deep state coup attempt against the Trump campaign. It turns out the United States of America has a law enforcement treaty with Ukraine that actually demands bilateral cooperation on such criminal investigations.

Secondly, there’s an even more absurd idea that Obama and the Dems somehow never pressure anyone to do anything in exchange for foreign aid. As “Quid pro-Joe” has openly admitted, it was routine for Obama officials to not just demand payoffs and bribes from nations like Ukraine, but to even publicly brag about it on national television. We now have the records of the actual financial transactions where Burisma Holdings of Ukraine issued 38 payments to Hunter Biden, totally more than $3.1 million. Former Vice President Joe Biden publicly bragged about pressuring Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who was investigating the corruption and fraud involving the Bidens, and Joe Biden proclaimed he would withhold a billion dollars in foreign aid funding unless that prosecutor was fired!

Watch Joe Biden publicly brag about his “quid pro quo” threats in this stunning video featured on Brighteon.com:

Does that mean Adam Schiff is holding a public trial over Joe Biden’s admitted corruption and extortion? Of course not. The Democrats pretend that never happened. Instead, they are fabricating the hoax that claims Trump did what Joe Biden actually did.

Like always, the Democrats are projecting their own criminal fraud, extortion, blackmail, and other crimes onto Trump. Everything the Democrats claim Trump did was actually carried out by the Democrats themselves.

Because when it comes to the lawless, tyrannical Left, everything is staged. It’s all theater.

Adam Schiff is now pretending he has no idea who the “whistleblower” really is

Like every theatrical production you’ve ever attended, it’s all scripted for effect. No one is allowed to deviate from the script, and the Dems exert total control over which witnesses are allowed to speak and what they’re allowed to say.

In fact, one of the most hilarious requirements of this Schiff show is that no one name the so-called “whistleblower” who is, of course, nothing more than a deep state spy who initiated this entire Schiff show by claiming he overheard a Trump call with Ukraine during which terrible things were supposedly said. This “whistleblower” is now widely reported to be Eric Ciaramella, who even Sen. Rand Paul has publicly named. But Ciaramella is a Schiff / Brennan operative who works for the deep state, and he’s part of the very same cabal of deep state traitors who have been trying to carry out an illegal political coup against our president for the last three years.

Congenital liar Adam Schiff now claims he has no idea who the whistleblower is. Seriously.

Understand that Ciaramella was coached by Adam Schiff during the theatrical planning phase of this entire Shiff-show fiasco. Now Adam Schiff claims he doesn’t know the identity of the whistleblower? What a fraud:

Daily Caller@DailyCaller

Rep. @Jim_Jordan rips @RepAdamSchiff for coordinating with the whistleblower.

Schiff claims he “does not know the identity of the whistleblower.”3,3599:43 AM – Nov 13, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy2,088 people are talking about this

As The Gateway Pundit reported, “Trump War Room co-host Raheem Kassam noted problems with Schiff’s denial, ‘Schiff says he doesn’t know the identity of the whistleblower, despite his staff being in contact with the whistleblower. Ok, but if he doesn’t know the identity, how can he as the Intel Chairman stop the whistleblower being named? And how is the name being redacted in docs?’”

In other words, we’re now supposed to believe Adam Schiff doesn’t know the name of the very person whose name he has redacted from all the interview transcripts.

That’s the level of insanity and stupidity now being run with a straight face by the Democrats, who are, without exception, devious liars and political con artists.

An intelligent person might ask how Schiff would know if anyone named the whistleblower if, as Schiff claims, he doesn’t know who the whistleblower is. Then again, you’re not allowed to ask intelligent questions, and you’re not allowed to know the names of the “anonymous” accusers who, almost without exception, are citing other anonymous sources who claim to have a third- or fourth-hand knowledge of something that wasn’t even illegal in the first place.

It’s all a Shiff Show.

And it’s all being run like the circus theater it has become… scripted for the TV cameras and carried out with a level of arrogance that insults the intelligence of every thinking American.

This circus is actually TREASON

In reality, what the Democrats are doing here is called treason, and if real justice were to be served in this country, every last one of them would hang for their treasonous crimes against our nation, after being convicted in a court of real law.

Perhaps some of them eventually will. According to news rumors, the DOJ is on the cusp of releasing reports that will expose the criminality of the deep state operators who masterminded this coup in the first place (Brennan, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, etc.). That’s why Schiff is rushing the impeachment theater, by the way, in the hopes of removing Trump from office before the DOJ investigations can be completed and released.

So it’s a race against the clock, with the Dems fully realizing that if they don’t remove Trump from office, many of them will be indicted by the DOJ.

Haven’t the American people had enough of the lawless, corrupt, dishonest Dems staging coup attempt after the coup attempt to try to overrule the American voters?

It’s time to clean up Washington D.C. and sweep the demonrats down the sewers once and for all. Arrest them all for treason and end the hoaxes, fabrications and deep state conspiracies that have long sought to overrule the will of the people and run America as a criminal cartel that only benefits the special elite.

Soon, it will become obvious that the only way America can be saved is for the people to rise up and assist Trump in carrying out mass arrests of the treasonous criminals who are behind all this… which includes hundreds of fake news media hacks, too. Perhaps that day is coming soon. Until then, enjoy the hilarious Schiff Show theater that pretends to be legitimate, all while America collapses into a mass-medicated homeless welfare state of corruption and poverty.FacebookTwitterShare Source

Tagged Under: Adam Schiffclown showdeep stateimpeachmentinsanityleft cultlunaticsPresident Trumpriggedtheater

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

The Impeachment Pantomime – A Primer

The political theatrics that begins today raises several questions. For starters, will Joe Biden be investigated for mounting evidence of corruption? And why is the corporate media turning the CIA “whistleblower” into a phantom in plain sight?

Now that “Russiagate” has failed and “Ukrainegate” neatly takes its place, many questions arise. Will the Democratic Party, this time in open collusion with the intelligence apparatus, succeed in its second attempt to depose President Donald Trump in what might fairly be called a bloodless coup? Whatever the outcome of the thus-far-farcical impeachment probe, which is to be conducted publicly as of Wednesday, did the president use his office to pressure Ukraine on behalf of his own personal and political interests? Did Trump, in his fateful telephone conversation last July 25 with Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine’s president, but U.S. national security at risk, as is alleged?

All good questions. Here is another: Will Joe Biden, at present the leading contender for the Democratic presidential nomination, get away with what is almost certain to prove his gross corruption and gross abuse of office when he carried the Ukraine portfolio while serving as vice president under Barack Obama?

Corollary line of inquiry: Will the corporate media, The New York Times in the lead, get away with self-censoring what is now irrefutable evidence of the impeachment probe’s various frauds and corruption? Ditto in the Biden case: Can the Times and the media that faithfully follow its leaders continue to disregard accumulating circumstantial evidence of Biden’s guilt as he appears to have acted in the interest of his son Hunter while the latter sat on the board of one of Ukraine’s largest privately held natural gas producers? 

Innuendo & Interference 

It is not difficult to imagine that Trump presented Zelensky with his famous quid pro quo when they spoke last summer: Open an investigation into Biden père et fils and I will release $391 million in military aid and invite you to the White House. Trump seems to be no stranger to abuses of power of this sort. But the impeachment probe has swiftly run up against the same problem that sank the good ship Russiagate: It has produced no evidence. Innuendo and inference, yes. Various syllogisms, yes. But no evidence. 

There is none in the transcript of the telephone exchange. Zelensky has flatly stated that there was no quid pro quo. The witnesses so far called to testify have had little to offer other than their personal opinions, even if Capitol Hill Democrats pretend these testimonies are prima facie damning. And the witnesses are to one or another degree of questionable motives: To a one, they appear to be Russophobes who favor military aid to Ukraine; to a one, they are turf-conscious careerists who think they set U.S. foreign policy and resent the president for intruding upon them. It is increasingly evident that Trump’s true offense is proposing to renovate a foreign policy framework that has been more or less untouched for 75 years (and is in dire need of renovation). 

Ten days ago Real Clear Investigations suggested that the “whistleblower” whose “complaint” last August set the impeachment probe in motion was in all likelihood a CIA agent named Eric Ciaramella. And who is Eric Ciaramella? It turns out he is a young but seasoned Democratic Party apparatchik conducting his spookery on American soil.

Ciaramella has previously worked with Joe Biden during the latter’s days as veep; with Susan Rice, Obama’s recklessly hawkish national security adviser; with John Brennan, a key architect of the Russiagate edifice; as well as with Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-born Democratic National Committee official charged during the 2016 campaign season with digging up dirt on none other than candidate Donald Trump.

For good measure, Paul Sperry’s perspicacious reporting in Real Clear Investigations reveals that Ciaramella conferred with the staff of Rep. Adam Schiff, the House Democrat leading the impeachment process, a month prior to filing his “complaint” to the CIA’s inspector general.

This information comes after Schiff stated on the record that the staff of the House Intelligence Committee, which he heads, had no contact with the whistleblower. Schiff has since acknowledged the Ciaramella connection.   

Phantom in Plain Sight

No wonder no one in Washington will name this phantom in plain sight. The impeachment probe starts to take on a certain reek. It starts to look as if contempt for Trump takes precedence over the democratic process — a dangerous priority. Sperry quotes Fred Fleitz, a former National Security Council official, thus: “Everyone knows who he is. CNN knows. The Washington Post knows. The New York Times knows. Congress knows. The White House knows…. They’re hiding him because of his political bias.”

Here we come to another question. If everyone knows the whistleblower’s identity, why have the corporate media declined to name him? There can be but one answer to this question: If Ciaramella’s identity were publicized and his professional record exposed, the Ukrainegate narrative would instantly collapse into a second-rate vaudeville act — a farce by any other name, although “hoax” might do, even if Trump has made the term his own. 

There is another half to this burlesque. While Schiff and his House colleagues chicken-scratch for something, anything that may justify a formal impeachment, a clear, documented record emerges of Joe Biden’s official interventions in Ukraine in behalf of Burisma Holdings, the gas company that named Hunter Biden to its board in March 2014 — a month, it is worth noting, after the U.S.–cultivated coup in Kiev.

There is no thought of scrutinizing Biden’s activities by way of an official inquiry. In its way, this, too, reflects upon the pantomime of the impeachment probe. Are there sufficient grounds to open an investigation? Emphatically there are. Two reports published last week make this plain by any reasonable measure. 

‘Bursimagate’

John Solomon, a singularly competent follower of Russiagate and Ukrainegate, published a report last Monday exposing Hunter Biden’s extensive contacts with the Obama State Department in the early months of 2016. Two developments were pending at the time. They lie at the heart of what we may well call “Burismagate.”

John Solomon. (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

One, the Obama administration had committed to providing Ukraine with $1 billion in loan guarantees. In a December 2015 address to the Rada, Ukraine’s legislature, V–P Biden withheld an apparently planned announcement of the credit facility.

Two, coincident with Hunter Biden’s numerous conferences at the State Department, Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Viktor Shokin, was swiftly advancing a corruption investigation into Burisma’s oligarchic owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, who was by early 2016 living in exile. Just prior to Biden’s spate of visits to Foggy Bottom, Shokin had confiscated several of Zlochevsky’s properties—a clear sign that he was closing in. Joe Biden wanted Shokin fired. He is, of course, famously on the record boasting of his threat [starts at 52.00 in the video below]to withhold the loan guarantee as a means to getting this done. Shokin was in short order dismissed, and the loan guarantee went through. 

Solomon documents his report with memos he obtained via the Freedom of Information Act earlier this year. These add significantly to the picture. “Hunter Biden and his Ukrainian gas firm colleagues had multiple contacts with the Obama State Department during the 2016 election cycle,” he writes, “including one just a month before Vice President Joe Biden forced Ukraine to fire the prosecutor investigating his son’s company for corruption.”

Last Tuesday, a day after Solomon published his report, Moon of Alabama, the much-followed web publication, posted a granularly researched and well-sourced timeline of the events surrounding Shokin’s dismissal at Vice President Biden’s request. This is the most complete chronology of the Burismagate story yet available.

In an ethical judicial system, it or something like it would now sit on a prosecutor’s desk. There is no suggestion in the Moon of Alabama’s timeline that Shokin had shelved his investigation into Burisma by the time Biden exerted pressure to get him sacked, as Biden’s defenders assert. Just the opposite appears to be the true case: The timeline indicates Shokin was about to pounce. Indeed Shokin said so under oath in an Austrian court case, testifying that he was fired because of Biden’s pressure not to conduct the probe.

It is important to note that there is no conclusive evidence that Joe Biden misused his office on behalf of his son’s business interests simply because there has been no investigation. Given what is beginning to emerge, however, the need for one can no longer be in doubt. Can Democrats and the media obscure indefinitely what now amounts to very strong circumstantial evidence against Biden?

We live in a time when the corporate media make as much effort to hide information as they do to report it. But as in the case of Ciaramella’s identity, it is unlikely these myriad omissions can be sustained indefinitely — especially if Biden wins the Democratic nomination next year. Forecast: If only because of Burismagate, Joe Biden will never be president.

As everyone in Washington seems to understand, it is highly unlikely Trump will be ousted via an impeachment trial: The Republican-controlled Senate can be counted on to keep him in office. Whatever Trump got up to with Zelensky, there is little chance it will prove sufficient to drive him from office. As to the charge that Trump’s dealings with the Ukrainian president threatened national security, let us allow this old chestnut to speak for itself.

Price of Irresponsible Theatrics

This leaves us to reckon the price our troubled republic will pay for months of irresponsible theatrics that are more or less preordained to lead nowhere.

More questions. What damage will the Democrats have done when Ukrainegate draws to a close (assuming it does at some point)? What harm has come to U.S. political institutions, governing bodies, judiciary, and media? The corporate press has been profligately careless of its already questionable credibility during the years of Russiagate and now Ukrainegate. Can anyone argue there is no lasting price to pay for this?

More urgently, what do the past three years of incessant efforts to unseat a president tell us about the power of unelected constituencies? The CIA is now openly operating on American soil in a clear breach of its charter and U.S. law. There is absolutely no way this can be questioned. We must now contemplate the frightening similarities Russiagate and Ukrainegate share with the agency’s classic coup operations abroad: Commandeering the media, stirring discontent with the leadership, pumping up the opposition, waving false flags, incessant disinformation campaigns: Maybe it was fated that what America has been doing abroad the whole of the postwar era would eventually come home. 

What, at last, must we conclude about the ability of any president (of any stripe) to effect authentic change when our administrative state — “deep,” if you like — opposes it? Source

HNewsWire Logo top Menu

Many Americans were ready to forsake all hope of peace. Peace, Peace — but there is no peace, No God, No Peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from DC will bring to our ears the clash of resounding Civil UN-REST! ….. Why stand idle? What is it that gentlemen have become, Cowards? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of “The Electronic Prison By Big Tech slavery”? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

Nancy Pelosi just took the biggest gamble of her entire political career.  If she is ultimately successful, she will be remembered as the woman that removed Donald Trump from the White House, and Democrats will treat her like a hero for the rest of her life.  But if she fails and Trump wins in 2020, the backlash that she created when she tried to impeach Trump is likely to be blamed, and she could potentially lose her leadership role in the House.  Of course, at that point, she probably wouldn’t want to remain in the House much longer, and she would be hated by many Democrats for the rest of her life for subjecting them to four more years of Trump.  So it really is all on the line for Nancy Pelosi, and she never should have gone down this road if she wasn’t absolutely certain that she could deliver.

People often talk about impeachment as if it were identical to removing the President from office. However, this is not the case. In order to remove a President from office, the House of Representatives first has to impeach him, and then the Senate has to convict him. Note that President Clinton was impeached by the House in 1998, but he was subsequently acquitted by the Senate, so he was not removed from office. The only other President who was impeached by the House was Andrew Johnson in 1868, but he was also acquitted by the Senate. Formally, no US President has ever been removed by impeachment and conviction. When the Republican leadership informed Richard Nixon that impeachment and conviction were inevitable he resigned prematurely and it never came to a vote.

Due to the two-stage procedure of impeachment and conviction, it is not that easy to remove a President from office. What’s more, while for impeachment in the House of Representatives only a simple majority of more than 1/2 is needed, a conviction in the Senate requires a 2/3 majority. At present, the Democrats have a 235-198 majority in the House (1 independent, 1 vacancy). In contrast, the Republicans have a 53-47 majority in the Senate (2 independents formally caucus with the Democrats). Assuming that all the Democrats vote for impeachment and conviction, it would take 20 Republican defectors in the Senate to remove the President from office. This equals about 38% of the Republican Senators. So while impeachment is within reach of the Democrats, the hurdle for conviction is much higher.

This makes for a dramatic coup de théâtre, but it’s still only that: theater. Pelosi lost face, yes. 

And at this point, most Americans don’t want impeachment proceedings to happen.  For example, just check out what a Politico/Morning Consult poll just found

In the poll — conducted Friday through Sunday, as stories circled about Trump allegedly pressuring Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, one of the Democratic candidates hoping to oust him — 36 percent of respondents said they believe Congress should begin impeachment proceedings against Trump.

Other surveys have come up with similar results, but there is one survey out there that indicates that most Americans would actually support impeachment proceedings if the evidence shows that “Trump did use his presidential power to force a foreign leader to help take down a political rival”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced on Tuesday the opening of a formal impeachment inquiry against Trump in response to the Ukraine controversy. If it’s found that Trump did use his presidential power to force a foreign leader to help take down a political rival, 55 percent of U.S. adults said they would support removing him from office, according to a recent YouGov survey.

Forty-four percent of those polled said they’d “strongly support” removing Trump if the allegations are true, while another 11 percent said they’d “somewhat support” it.

But as it stands right now, on the national level this is a very unpopular decision by Pelosi, and it could potentially hurt Democrats among key blocs of voters

Worse yet, impeachment isn’t selling where Democrats made their best gains in the midterms. A majority of suburban respondents oppose starting the impeachment process (35 percent/50 percent), with a wider gap among rural respondents (27/59), while urban voters are more ambivalent than one might guess (47/35). Impeachment trails by double digits in the South (33/53), Midwest, (36/48), and even in the Democrat-friendly Northeast (37/48).

Another reason why this is potentially a giant mistake by Nancy Pelosi is the fact that all of this focus on Ukraine is almost certainly going to damage one of the frontrunners for the Democratic nomination. Source

CLOWNWORLD

Impeachment Backfires: Trump Raises $5 Million In 24 Hours

Steve Watson

Base rallies as Democrats get desperate

The Democrats’ decision to formally begin an impeachment inquiry against President Trump is already monumentally backfiring, only resulting in rallying Trump’s supporters into action.

Trump’s base has been energized by the continuation of the ‘witch hunt’ against the President, as it immediately turned out that the basis for the impeachment hearings was a ‘whistleblower’ with an ax to grind against Trump.

Trump 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale reported that the result has been in influx of donations to the campaign to the tune of $5 million in one day

Parscale called it a “huge groundswell of support,” and noted that donations came in from all over the country.

Brad Parscale@parscale

In the 24 hours since news of Nancy Pelosi’s impeachment announcement, @realDonaldTrump’s campaign & @GOP have BLOWN OUT fundraising!

$5 Million combined in 24 hrs
Donors in all 50 states

A huge groundswell of support leading to Trump landslide in 2020!33K2:18 PM – Sep 25, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy15.1K people are talking about this

The impeachment move collapsed into ridiculousness Wednesday when it emerged that the so-called whistleblower, who alleged that Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, was found by the intelligence community Inspector General to have ‘political bias’ and was in favor of a ‘rival candidate’ for US president.

In addition, The Federalist notes that the whistleblower’s attorney Andrew Bakaj “interned for [Chuck] Schumer in the spring of 2001 and for [Hillary] Clinton in the fall of the same year.”

Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump

“Attorney For Anti-Trump ‘Whistleblower’ Worked For Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer” https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/24/attorney-for-anti-trump-whistleblower-worked-for-hillary-clinton-chuck-schumer/ …Attorney For ‘Whistleblower’ Worked For Hillary Clinton, Chuck SchumerAndrew Bakaj interned for Schuck Schumer in the spring of 2001 and for Hillary Clinton in the fall of the same year, according to Bakaj’s LinkedIn page.thefederalist.com60.2K9:26 PM – Sep 24, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy35.3K people are talking about this

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi initiated a formal impeachment inquiry by alleging that the administration was hiding the whistleblower complaint.

When the White House released the transcript of Trump’s call to the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, it proved that there was no pressuring whatsoever, and Zelensky himself said during a Wednesday press conference that “nobody pushed me.”

After braying for the release of the transcript for 24 hours, Democrats suddenly lost interest in it when Trump released it, with Pelosi even admitting she hasn’t even read it, but still damning the President over the call with Zelensky.

Earlier in the day, the White House released a declassified transcript of Trump’s July call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, showing Trump sought a review of former Vice President Joe Biden’s efforts to have Ukraine’s former top prosecutor fired.

Joe Biden has acknowledged on camera that, when he was vice president, he successfully pressured Ukraine to fire that prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who was investigating the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings — where Hunter Biden had a highly lucrative role on the board paying him tens of thousands of dollars per month, despite limited relevant expertise. Shokin himself had been widely accused of corruption, while critics charged that Hunter Biden might have been essentially selling access to his father, who had pushed Ukraine to increase its natural gas production.

Trump made the request on the call for Ukraine to look into the Bidens after Zelensky first mentioned Ukraine’s corruption issues, and after Trump separately requested as a “favor” that Ukraine help investigate foreign interference in the 2016 elections, including the hack of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) server involving the data security company CrowdStrike.

Multiple news outlets — including The New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, and The Washington Post — inaccurately reported that the “favor” related specifically to investigating Biden.

Jason Howerton@jason_howerton

This is one of the most deceptive pieces of reporting I have ever seen. Literally.@KatyTurNBC, you’re better than this.

This is deliberate misleading of an audience. My gosh, issue a correction.2,3664:18 PM – Sep 25, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy1,571 people are talking about this

CHIZ @CHIZMAGA

Dems: “We demand you release the transcript of the call!”

Trump: “Ok done.”

Dems: “Tomorrow morning!”

Trump: “No problem.”

Dems: “Declassified!”

Trump: “You got it.”

Dems: “Completely unredacted!”

Trump: “Sure thing.”

Dems: “The transcript is meaningless! Proves nothing!”9,2792:38 AM – Sep 25, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy3,916 people are talking about this

In addition, Democrats actually did the exact same thing they are now trying to impeach Trump for when they wrote to the Ukrainian government last year urging them to continue investigations into the fantasy collusion with Russia. Source

A complete clown show.

Brian Tyler Cohen@briantylercohen

Oh nothing, just the president of the United States announcing that Nancy Pelosi is no longer Speaker of the House.9,6401:50 PM – Sep 25, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy5,438 people are talking about this

RazörFist@RAZ0RFIST

Where were you when ‘Muh Russia’ became ‘Muh Ukraine’ without a single trace of transitional irony in the interim?1,43710:29 AM – Sep 25, 2019Twitter Ads info and privacy318 people are talking about this

Summary

  • The Democrats in the House of Representatives have decided to start impeachment proceedings against President Trump. While impeachment is possible as the Democrats have a majority in the House of Representatives, the conviction is unlikely as long as the Republicans in the Senate continue to support their President. In this case, the removal of President Trump from office is unlikely, neither by conviction nor by the 25th Amendment.
  • What’s more, history suggests that it will be a challenge for the Democrats to complete the process of impeachment & conviction before Election Day 2020. And then there is – at least as things stand now – virtually no chance of conviction. Consequently, it is unlikely to affect who is on the Republican ticket for the presidential elections in 2020.
  • However, it will set the tone for the election campaign. In fact, it could even backfire on the Democrats as it may energize Trump voters to go to the polls. Meanwhile, the impeachment theme may overshadow any political message that the Democrats might want to sell to the electorate. What’s more, Democratic candidate Joe Biden may not come out of this process unscathed. This would strengthen the position of the remaining leading candidates in the Democratic primaries, which are far more left-wing than Biden. While this strengthens the position of the left-wing in the Democratic Party, it may scare away centrist voters on Election Day. Since impeachability is a political decision rather than a legal matter, history will tell whether starting an impeachment inquiry was the right decision for the Democrats.
  • Impeachment proceedings and the related further deterioration of the US domestic political climate add to the range of factors that are creating uncertainty for the economic outlook that the Fed is monitoring closely. What’s more, they reduce the chance of meaningful fiscal policy legislation. Therefore, third insurance cut before the end of the year – which is already in our baseline forecast – has become more likely. It also makes our forecast of a recession in 2020 and the Fed cutting all the way back to zero before the end of next year more likely Source

StevieRay Hansen
Editor, HNewsWire.com

Let Me Make This Abundantly Clear. (I Am Apolitical) While I Have a General Distaste for Politicians No Matter the Party They Belong To, I Am Unashamedly Politically a Bible Believing Conservative Christian. I Have a Severe Distrust of Government. I Believe It Is the Most Inefficient and Ineffective Way to Accomplish Most Things. While I Strongly Disagree with Liberals/Progressives and Conservative on Most Political Issues, and While I Believe Liberals/Progressives and Most Politicians Are Terribly Misguided and Naive About What Big Government Will Eventually Result In, I Strive to Not Question Their Motives. at the Same Time, While I Find Myself in Agreement with Conservative Politicians on Some Issues, I Do Not Believe Electing Republicans Is the Answer to Everything. for Me, Very Sadly, the Main Difference Between Republicans and Democrats Is How Quickly They Want to Drive the Car Towards the Cliff. Simply Put, I Do Not Believe the Government Is the Solution for Everything. I Do Not Place Any Faith, Trust, or Hope in Any Politicians to Fix What Is Wrong with the World. “Come Lord Jesus!” (Revelation 22:20)

Our government has been overthrown. As evidenced by Trump’s capitulation on the border, his recent servitude to the GMO industry and his acquiescence to the warmongers, our President has been compromised. Our liberties are being eliminated one by one. Gun confiscation is next. The Constitution is gasping its last breaths. Our borders are destroyed and our culture has been turned upside down by every perversion known to man.

Education is useless without the bible (Daniel Webster)

Usually, the Lord doth no great thing for or against his people, without giving warning of it before it comes.

John Wesley who said that what we tolerate in our generation, will be embraced by the next. Wesley is 100% correct! We are living in sick times.

Evil Exists So Spiritual Warfare Becomes Necessary!

  1. Corinthians 4:8-11 New King James Version (NKJV)
  2. We are hard-pressed on every side, yet not crushed; we are perplexed, but not in despair; 9. persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed— 10. always carrying about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life of Jesus also may be manifested in our body. 11. For we who live are always delivered to death for Jesus’ sake, that the life of Jesus also may be manifested in our mortal flesh.

Satan has power over (LGBTQE-TRANS PEOPLE). The “sons of disobedience” referred to in Ephesians 2:2 are those who have not trusted Christ as Lord and Savior (cf. Acts 26:18; 2 Corinthians 4:4; Revelation 13:12). The demons are also under the rule of Satan (Matthew 12:24), and one of his titles is “prince of demons” (Matthew 9:34). Satan has a kingdom (Matthew 12:26) and a throne (Revelation 2:13). Satan is called a prince because he is a ruler and possesses the power to manifest evil in the world through influencing people and commanding demons.

HNewsWire- “All political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable.” Just look at some of our modern-day examples: torture is “enhanced interrogation techniques”; murder is “collateral damage”; the aggression initiation of war is a “pre-emptive strike”; the theft of taxpayers’ money is a “bailout”, and the theft of depositors’ money in a bank is a “haircut” or “bail-in”.In a blatant example of Newspeak, the New World Order controllers (through the psychiatric DSM V) have tried to rename pedophiles as “minor-attracted persons” and redefine pedophilia as “sexual orientation”. This makes no sense since sexual orientation has to do with gender, not age, with whether you are attracted to males or females, not how old they are. There are even organizations (like B4UAct.org) which are claiming that pedophiles are being unfairly stigmatized for their feelings!

If homosexuality has been posed as healthy, good and normal, in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, so can pedophilia. Pro-pedophilic articles are making their way into academia.

The Cult of LGBTQE-E for EVIL and is often a cover for child-molesting perverts

Unfortunately, not all alternative sources are reliable, even some Major Christian (and I use Christian loosely) news sources have been corrupted. They will NOT tell the truth. They just parrot the deceptive narratives perpetrated by those who currently control our government and media. Even those who are honestly trying to present the truth can miss it sometimes. There is so much deception out there. In these last days, you must be wise as serpents and gentle as lambs. It is no time to sleep or slumber. Diligence and vigilance are required. It is critical that you think for yourself and not be a Lemming.

Tagged Under: antichrist, antichrists, Apple, Bible, Big Tech, bigotry, Christian baker, Christianity, Christians, Colorado, Colorado Civil Rights Commission, conservatives, deep state, demonic assault, end of days, end times, Facebook, First Amendment, free speech, Google, hate groups, Hate speech, hatred, hostility, insanity, Instagram, intolerance, Jack Phillips, jesus, Jesus Christ, left cult, Leftists, LGBT mafia, Liberal Mob, lunatics, persecution, Pinterest, prophecy, Southern Poverty Law Center, SPLC, Tribulation, Twitter

HNewsWire Logo Bottom Menu

Don't Miss

Steve-Quayle-Super-Pack
Christian-Journal-1

Latest News

Robert de Niro: Trump a ‘Nasty Little Bitch’ and His Supporters Are Crazy

By StevieRay Hansen | December 15, 2019

To get my political opinions, I go to all the top experts… Robert DeNiro, Matt Damon, Bruce Willis, Brie Larson, Alec Baldwin, Tim Allen, Angelina…

Read More

Decades of Democratic Rule Ruined Some of Our Finest Cities, They Destroy Everything They Touch

By StevieRay Hansen | December 15, 2019

Loopy Left Reprobates… Urban Blight: Filmmaker Michael Moore tweeted, “Flint has voted for Dems for 84 straight yrs” and wanted to know, “What did it…

Read More

Nancy Pelosi Isn’t Just Hemorrhaging Votes for Her Impeachment Gambit

By StevieRay Hansen | December 15, 2019

On Saturday, Van Drew’s congressional and campaign staff were notified of the expected switch, Democratic sources tell Politico. The only question which remains is when he will…

Read More

Who Are The Globalists And What Do They Want?

By StevieRay Hansen | December 14, 2019

Calls for a new global monetary regime are nothing new. After World War II left the world’s financial system in disarray, political leaders and financial…

Read More

Did Trump Actually Eliminate Federal Funding for Planned Parenthood with New Title X Rule?

By StevieRay Hansen | December 14, 2019

Another Broken Promise… While President Donald Trump was praised by many pro-life advocates after his Protect Life Rule in Title X earlier this year.  However,…

Read More

Our Elected Officials, Law Enforcement Agencies Are Leviathan Spirits, “Twisted”

By StevieRay Hansen | December 14, 2019

They are turning the people against each other, it’s actually demonic… Those who believe in a leviathan spirit use references to the creature described in…

Read More

The Progressives Have Threatened the Free Will of American People Once Again

By StevieRay Hansen | December 13, 2019

The Ringleader Progressive Democrat Nancy Pelosi and Her Band of Demon Knights (Dem — Governor Northam) Will Stop at Nothing in There Quest to Destroy…

Read More

Strange Things Are Happening In The Waters Along The West Coast

By StevieRay Hansen | December 13, 2019

The World Fish and Birds Are Starting To Disappear… SCIENTIST OVERVIEW OF WHY ALL THE NASA FLIGHTS ON WEST COAST UP AND OVER THE OCEAN…

Read More

Christian Music Has a Growing Gray Area!

By StevieRay Hansen | December 13, 2019

My intention is not to be unkind; but rather, to expose the demonic nature of so-called “Christian rock” and “Christian Hip Hop” music. The issue…

Read More

The FBI Teams Up With The Post Office To Get Your Fingerprints

By StevieRay Hansen | December 13, 2019

Politician Speak: Well in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into…

Read More

StevieRay Hansen

In his riveting memoir, "A Long Journey Home", StevieRay Hansen will lead you through his incredible journey from homeless kid to multimillionaire oilman willing to give a helping hand to other throwaway kids. Available on Amazon.

Leave a Comment





A Long Journey Home Book Cover

A Long Journey Home

A book about a fourteen-year-old boy, the son of a Baptist pastor, thrown from his home at age 14. This boy, StevieRay, would later become a multimillionaire. Now he gives orphans a second chance at life.

Scroll To Top